Isuzu D-Max Double Cab vs Nissan NP200

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Includes an archived model

Current and archived cars are compared side by side. Archived models keep their verified historical specs, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Nissan NP200
Isuzu D-Max Double Cab in South Africa

Isuzu D-Max Double Cab

3.0 DDi Double Cab 4x4 LSE AT Diesel Automatic
ZAR 900,310 ex-showroom
⚡ 110 kW 🔧 350 @ 1800-2600 Nm ⛽ 12.3 km/l
VS
Nissan NP200 in South Africa

Nissan NP200

1.6 Safety Pack Manual Petrol Manual Archive reference
ZAR 284,900 last listed
No longer sold new Specs stay visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance D-Max Double Cab
Fuel Economy NP200
🛡 Safety D-Max Double Cab
📦 Practicality D-Max Double Cab
🔑 Ownership NP200
NP200 starts ZAR 574010 cheaper D-Max Double Cab from ZAR 574,010 · NP200 from ZAR 224,900

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec D-Max Double Cab NP200
Engine Power 110 @ 3600 Not confirmed
Torque 350 @ 1800-2600 Not confirmed
Engine Size 3000 Not confirmed
Claimed Mileage 12.3 Not confirmed
Ground Clearance 232 Not confirmed
Boot Space Not Applicable Not confirmed
Airbags Not Available Not confirmed
Kerb Weight 2070 Not confirmed
Seating Capacity 5 Not confirmed
Warranty 5 years / 120 000 km Not confirmed

= leads in this spec

Archived models stay fully comparable. Verified specs remain visible; historical fields that were not source-confirmed are marked Not confirmed instead of being guessed.

The Bottom Line

D-Max Double Cab holds a noticeable edge over NP200, especially in key ownership areas.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance D-Max Double Cab +12 pts
Efficiency NP200 +1 pts
Safety D-Max Double Cab +38 pts
Practicality D-Max Double Cab +35 pts
Ownership NP200 +2 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

🏆 Overall Winner

D-Max Double Cab

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: Highway Driving Family Usage

NP200

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best suited to: Fuel Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

D-Max Double Cab

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

NP200

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec D-Max Double Cab NP200
Model Introduced Year Current local generation year not confirmed Not confirmed
Generation Current South African D-Max Double Cab listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data. Not confirmed
Facelift History Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle. Not confirmed
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version Not confirmed
Facelift Version Ending Current Not confirmed
Body Style Double Cab pickup Not confirmed
Body Type Cab Single/extended/double cab as per derivative name Not confirmed
Color Note Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering. Not confirmed
Dealer Stock Note Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup Not confirmed
Drivetrain Note Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 3.0 DDi Double Cab 4x4 LSE AT Not confirmed
Model Year MY26 Not confirmed
Production Status published Not confirmed
Segment Pickup Not confirmed
Vehicle Type Pickup Not confirmed
Spec D-Max Double Cab NP200
Ground Clearance 232 mm Not confirmed
Wheelbase 3125 mm Not confirmed
Length 5333 mm Not confirmed
Width 1880 mm Not confirmed
Height 1805 mm Not confirmed
Kerb Weight 2070 kg Not confirmed
Gross Vehicle Weight 3100 kg Not confirmed
Seating Capacity 5 Not confirmed
Boot Space Not Applicable Not confirmed
Towing Capacity 3500 kg Not confirmed
Front Track Width Not Applicable Not confirmed
Rear Track Width Not Applicable Not confirmed
Turning Radius 12.5 m Not confirmed
Load Bed Length 1495 mm Not confirmed
Load Bed Width 1530 mm Not confirmed
Front Legroom Not Applicable Not confirmed
Rear Legroom Not Applicable Not confirmed
Front Headroom Not Applicable Not confirmed
Rear Headroom Not Applicable Not confirmed
Front Shoulder Room Not Applicable Not confirmed
Rear Shoulder Room Not Applicable Not confirmed
Boot Space Seats Folded Not Applicable Not confirmed
Number of Doors 4 Not confirmed
Max Payload 970 kg Not confirmed
Boot Volume Not Applicable Not confirmed
Doors 4 Not confirmed
Seats 5 Not confirmed
Fuel Tank Capacity 76 l Not confirmed
Gross Combined Mass Kg 6000 kg Not confirmed
Gross Vehicle Mass Kg 3100 kg Not confirmed
Ground Clearance Max 232 mm Not confirmed
Ground Clearance Min 232 mm Not confirmed
Ground Clearance Mm 232 mm Not confirmed
Height Mm 1805 mm Not confirmed
Length Mm 5333 mm Not confirmed
Loadbox Length Mm 1495 mm Not confirmed
Loadbox Width Mm 1530 mm Not confirmed
Payload Kg 970 kg Not confirmed
Cargo Volume Not Applicable Not confirmed
Rear Overhang Mm 1318 mm Not confirmed
Tare Mass Kg 2070 kg Not confirmed
Track Front Rear Mm 1570/1570 Not confirmed
Turning Circle 12.5 m Not confirmed
Turning Circle M 12.5 m Not confirmed
Width Mm 1880 mm Not confirmed

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

D-Max Double Cab leads by 18 points

D-Max Double Cab holds a noticeable edge over NP200, especially in key ownership areas.

Winner 57 /100
Lead 18 points
Data 79% confidence
57
#1 Winner

D-Max Double Cab

79% data confidence 1 strong categories
Best at Practicality 85 Check Safety 38
Performance 62
Efficiency 49
Safety 38
Practicality 85
Ownership 48
Leads by 18 points
39
#2

NP200

11% data confidence 0 strong categories
Best at Performance 50 Check Safety 0
Performance 50
Efficiency 50
Safety 0
Practicality 50
Ownership 50
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance D-Max Double Cab +12 Efficiency NP200 +1 Safety D-Max Double Cab +38 Practicality D-Max Double Cab +35 Ownership NP200 +2

Moderate difference between the models.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

D-Max Double Cab

Performance 62/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 38/100
Practicality 85/100
Ownership 48/100

NP200

Performance 50/100
Efficiency 50/100
Safety 0/100
Practicality 50/100
Ownership 50/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 Isuzu D-Max Double Cab wins with 57 pts vs 39 pts for NP200

In structured scoring, D-Max Double Cab emerges as the stronger overall package. However, NP200 may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the D-Max Double Cab edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: D-Max Double Cab 49 vs NP200 50. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: D-Max Double Cab 38, NP200 0. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: D-Max Double Cab 48, NP200 50. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: D-Max Double Cab 85, NP200 50. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: D-Max Double Cab 62, NP200 50. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The D-Max Double Cab edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The D-Max Double Cab scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between D-Max Double Cab and NP200 in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: D-Max Double Cab scores 62 vs 50.

Efficiency: D-Max Double Cab scores 49 vs 50.

Safety: D-Max Double Cab scores 38 vs 0.

Practicality: D-Max Double Cab scores 85 vs 50.

Ownership: D-Max Double Cab scores 48 vs 50.

Final structured scoring gives D-Max Double Cab the advantage in this comparison.