MG Cyberster vs Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

MG Cyberster in South Africa

MG Cyberster

Dual Motor 4WD Roadster Electric Single-Speed Reduction Gear Current
ZAR 1,399,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 375 kW 🔧 725 Nm
VS
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max in South Africa

Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max

Executive 7DCT 2.0TGDI Petrol 7-Speed DCT Current
ZAR 609,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 187 kW 🔧 390 Nm ⛽ 13.2 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

MG Cyberster vs Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max: the short answer

Cyberster and Tiggo 8 Pro Max are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Tiggo 8 Pro Max starts ZAR 790,000 cheaper Cyberster from ZAR 1,399,900 · Tiggo 8 Pro Max from ZAR 609,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Cyberster Tiggo 8 Pro Max
Maximum Power Cyberster375 kW Tiggo 8 Pro Max187 kW @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque Cyberster725 Nm Tiggo 8 Pro Max390 Nm
Engine Size CybersterNot Applicable Tiggo 8 Pro Max2000 cc
Combined Fuel Economy CybersterNot Applicable Tiggo 8 Pro Max13.2 km/l
Ground Clearance Cyberster116 mm Tiggo 8 Pro Max203 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

MG Cyberster

Dual Motor 4WD Roadster

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max

Executive 7DCT 2.0TGDI

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

Cyberster

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency

Tiggo 8 Pro Max

Strengths
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Cyberster

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Tiggo 8 Pro Max

  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Cyberster Tiggo 8 Pro Max
Model Introduced Year 2025 2023
Generation First-generation battery-electric Cyberster roadster in local dual-motor all-wheel-drive form. Current South Africa Tiggo 8 Pro Max range
Facelift History South African launch specification introduced as MG's electric halo in 2025. Current South Africa version listed by official source
Facelift Launched Since 2025 2023
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Two-door, two-seat soft-top roadster SUV
Model Year 2025 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Electric Sports Roadster SUV
Vehicle Type Convertible SUV
Tare Mass Kg - 1658 kg
Spec Cyberster Tiggo 8 Pro Max
Length 4535 mm 4720 mm
Width 1913 mm 1860 mm
Height 1329 mm 1705 mm
Wheelbase 2690 mm 2710 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 116 mm 203 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed 203 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 0 l 51 l
Boot/Cargo Space 249 l 117 l
Kerb Weight 1985 kg 1658 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2210 kg 2211 kg
Payload Capacity 225 kg 553 kg
Towing Capacity 0 kg 1500 kg
Seating Capacity 2 seats 7 seats
Number of Rows 1 rows 3 rows
Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.45 m 5.6 m
Front Headroom 1043 mm 1020 mm
Rear Headroom Not Applicable 985 mm
Front Legroom 1070 mm 1055 mm
Rear Legroom Not Applicable 945 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Cyberster and Tiggo 8 Pro Max comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Cyberster 100 vs Tiggo 8 Pro Max 75.

Efficiency index: Cyberster 90 vs Tiggo 8 Pro Max 52.

Safety-equipment index: Cyberster 77 vs Tiggo 8 Pro Max 94.

Practicality index: Cyberster 34 vs Tiggo 8 Pro Max 58.

Ownership-cover index: Cyberster not separately scored vs Tiggo 8 Pro Max not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Cyberster leads by 4 points

Cyberster and Tiggo 8 Pro Max are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 75 /100
Lead 4 points
Data 63% source coverage
75
#1 Evidence leader

Cyberster

63% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Performance 100 Check Practicality 34
Performance 100
Efficiency 90
Safety 77
Practicality 34
Leads by 4 points
71
#2

Tiggo 8 Pro Max

69% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Efficiency 52
Performance 75
Efficiency 52
Safety 94
Practicality 58
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Cyberster +25 Efficiency Cyberster +38 Safety Tiggo 8 Pro Max +17 Practicality Tiggo 8 Pro Max +24

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Cyberster

Performance 100/100
Efficiency 90/100
Safety 77/100
Practicality 34/100

Tiggo 8 Pro Max

Performance 75/100
Efficiency 52/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 58/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index MG Cyberster leads the specification evidence index with 75 pts vs 71 pts for Tiggo 8 Pro Max

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Cyberster leads. However, Tiggo 8 Pro Max may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Cyberster vs Tiggo 8 Pro Max questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.