Mazda CX-60 vs Hyundai IONIQ 6

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Hyundai IONIQ 6 Discontinued model
Mazda CX-60 in South Africa

Mazda CX-60

2.5 Individual Edition Auto AWD Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 902,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 141 kW 🔧 261 Nm ⛽ 13.0 km/l
VS
Hyundai IONIQ 6 in South Africa

Hyundai IONIQ 6

77kWh AWD Executive Electric Single-Speed Reduction Gear Discontinued model
ZAR 1,048,900 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 239 kW 🔧 605 Nm
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mazda CX-60 vs Hyundai IONIQ 6: the short answer

IONIQ 6 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while CX-60 remains close.

Recorded price context CX-60: current from ZAR 790,200 · IONIQ 6: last listed from ZAR 799,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CX-60 IONIQ 6
Maximum Power CX-60141 kW @ 6000 rpm IONIQ 6239 kW
Maximum Torque CX-60261 Nm @ 3000 rpm IONIQ 6605 Nm
Engine Size CX-602488 cc IONIQ 6Not Applicable
Combined Fuel Economy CX-6013.0 km/l IONIQ 6Not Applicable
Ground Clearance CX-60178.8 mm IONIQ 6140 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Mazda CX-60

2.5 Individual Edition Auto AWD

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Hyundai IONIQ 6

77kWh AWD Executive

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

CX-60

Strengths
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader

IONIQ 6

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

CX-60

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

IONIQ 6

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec CX-60 IONIQ 6
Model Introduced Year 2023 2023
Generation First-generation KH-series Mazda CX-60 on Mazda's Large Product architecture First generation Ioniq 6 on Hyundai's E-GMP skateboard platform; streamliner body achieves 0.21 Cd drag coefficient — class-leading aerodynamics
Facelift History Mazda introduced the CX-60 locally in 2023, added the six-cylinder Takumi in 2024 and revised suspension and drivetrain calibration for the 2025 update. Launched in SA in 2023; the first electric sedan from Hyundai in the local market; based on the E-GMP platform shared with the Ioniq 5
Facelift Launched Since 2023 2023
Facelift Version Ending Current Not confirmed
Body Style SUV Sedan
Model Year 2026 Not confirmed
Production Status Active discontinued
Segment Premium mid-size SUV Sedan
Tare Mass Kg 1470 kg 2155 kg
Vehicle Type SUV Sedan
Spec CX-60 IONIQ 6
Length 4745 mm 4855 mm
Width 1890 mm 1880 mm
Height 1687.5 mm 1495 mm
Wheelbase 2870 mm 2950 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 178.8 mm 140 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 58 l 77.4 l
Boot/Cargo Space 477 l 401 l
Kerb Weight 1470 kg 2155 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2342 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Payload Capacity 872 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Towing Capacity 1500 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.85 m Not Officially Disclosed
Front Legroom 1058 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Legroom 990 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) - Not Officially Disclosed
Number of Rows - 2 rows
Front Headroom - Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Headroom - Not Officially Disclosed

In depth: how these cars differ

This CX-60 and IONIQ 6 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CX-60 59 vs IONIQ 6 100.

Efficiency index: CX-60 51 vs IONIQ 6 90.

Safety-equipment index: CX-60 98 vs IONIQ 6 98.

Practicality index: CX-60 68 vs IONIQ 6 61.

Ownership-cover index: CX-60 not separately scored vs IONIQ 6 65.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

IONIQ 6 leads by 14 points

IONIQ 6 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while CX-60 remains close.

Evidence leader 84 /100
Lead 14 points
Data 75% source coverage
84
#1 Evidence leader

IONIQ 6

75% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Performance 100 Check Practicality 61
Performance 100
Efficiency 90
Safety 98
Practicality 61
Ownership 65
Leads by 14 points
70
#2

CX-60

81% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Efficiency 51
Performance 59
Efficiency 51
Safety 98
Practicality 68
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance IONIQ 6 +41 Efficiency IONIQ 6 +39 Safety Level Practicality CX-60 +7

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

IONIQ 6

Performance 100/100
Efficiency 90/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 61/100
Ownership 65/100

CX-60

Performance 59/100
Efficiency 51/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 68/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Hyundai IONIQ 6 leads the specification evidence index with 84 pts vs 70 pts for CX-60

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, IONIQ 6 leads. However, CX-60 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

CX-60
CX-60
VS
Tayron
Tayron
CX-60 vs Tayron →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
H6 GT PHEV
H6 GT PHEV
CX-60 vs H6 GT PHEV →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
Pajero Sport
Pajero Sport
CX-60 vs Pajero Sport →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
C9
C9
CX-60 vs C9 →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
X1
X1
CX-60 vs X1 →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
A-Class
A-Class
CX-60 vs A-Class →
IONIQ 6
IONIQ 6Discontinued
VS
Tayron
Tayron
IONIQ 6 vs Tayron →
IONIQ 6
IONIQ 6Discontinued
VS
H6 GT PHEV
H6 GT PHEV
IONIQ 6 vs H6 GT PHEV →

CX-60 vs IONIQ 6 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.