Mazda CX-60 vs Mitsubishi Pajero Sport

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Mazda CX-60 in South Africa

Mazda CX-60

2.5 Individual Edition Auto AWD Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 902,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 141 kW 🔧 261 Nm ⛽ 13.0 km/l
VS
Mitsubishi Pajero Sport in South Africa

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport

2.4L DI-DC 8-speed A/T 4X4 Exceed Diesel 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 904,990 ex-showroom
⚡ 133 kW 🔧 430 Nm ⛽ 12.3 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Pajero Sport
Fuel Economy CX-60
🛡 Safety CX-60
📦 Practicality Pajero Sport
🔑 Ownership Not enough comparable data
Pajero Sport starts ZAR 210 cheaper CX-60 from ZAR 790,200 · Pajero Sport from ZAR 789,990

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec CX-60 Pajero Sport
Maximum Power 141 kW @ 6000 rpm 133 kW @ 3500 rpm
Maximum Torque 261 Nm @ 3000 rpm 430 Nm @ 2500 rpm
Engine Size 2488 cc 2442 cc
Combined Fuel Economy 13.0 km/l 12.3 km/l
Ground Clearance 178.8 mm 218 mm
Boot / Load Bay 477 l 193 l
Airbags 7 7
Kerb Weight 1470 kg 2080 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 7 seats
Warranty 5 Years/Unlimited km 3 years / 100,000 km

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

CX-60 and Pajero Sport are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Pajero Sport +13 pts
Efficiency CX-60 +2 pts
Safety CX-60 +26 pts
Practicality Pajero Sport +3 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Catalogue-index leader

CX-60

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Pajero Sport

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

CX-60

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Pajero Sport

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CX-60 Pajero Sport
Model Introduced Year 2023 2017
Generation First-generation KH-series Mazda CX-60 on Mazda's Large Product architecture Third-generation Pajero Sport, 2025 facelift
Facelift History Mazda introduced the CX-60 locally in 2023, added the six-cylinder Takumi in 2024 and revised suspension and drivetrain calibration for the 2025 update. South African facelift launched in May 2025.
Facelift Launched Since 2023 Current specification
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Active active
Segment Premium mid-size SUV Seven-seat ladder-frame SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1470 kg -
Vehicle Type SUV Passenger vehicle
Spec CX-60 Pajero Sport
Length 4745 mm 4825 mm
Width 1890 mm 1815 mm
Height 1687.5 mm 1805 mm
Wheelbase 2870 mm 2800 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 178.8 mm 218 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 58 l 68 l
Boot/Cargo Space 477 l 193 l
Kerb Weight 1470 kg 2080 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2342 kg 2775 kg
Payload Capacity 872 kg 695 kg
Towing Capacity 1500 kg 2850 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 7 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.85 m 5.6 m
Front Legroom 1058 mm 1067 mm
Rear Legroom 990 mm 880 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) - Not Officially Disclosed
Number of Rows - 3 rows
Front Headroom - 1022 mm
Rear Headroom - 957 mm

Source-backed Catalogue Index

A transparent specification index shown only when every vehicle clears the minimum comparable-data threshold.

Weighted / 100
Catalogue-index readout

CX-60 leads by 3 points

CX-60 and Pajero Sport are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Index leader 70 /100
Lead 3 points
Data 81% source coverage
70
#1 Index leader

CX-60

81% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Efficiency 51
Performance 59
Efficiency 51
Safety 98
Practicality 68
Leads by 3 points
67
#2

Pajero Sport

78% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Performance 72 Check Efficiency 49
Performance 72
Efficiency 49
Safety 72
Practicality 71
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Pajero Sport +13 Efficiency CX-60 +2 Safety CX-60 +26 Practicality Pajero Sport +3

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Catalogue-index leader

CX-60

Performance 59/100
Efficiency 51/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 68/100

Pajero Sport

Performance 72/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 72/100
Practicality 71/100

How to Read This Comparison

🏆 Mazda CX-60 leads the catalogue index with 70 pts vs 67 pts for Pajero Sport

In Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index, CX-60 leads. However, Pajero Sport may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.

Hagalu does not publish a guaranteed resale winner. Depreciation depends on age, mileage, condition, derivative, colour, supply and demand. Compare several current used-market listings and obtain trade-in valuations for equivalent examples before relying on a resale estimate.

Check the exact derivatives for drive type, ground clearance, tyres, approach and departure angles, wading depth and low-range gearing where officially disclosed. SUV styling or all-wheel drive alone does not prove that a vehicle is suitable for demanding off-road use.

Calculate each exact derivative using your monthly distance and a current fuel or electricity price, then add finance, insurance, scheduled service, tyres and licence costs. Hagalu does not claim a fixed monthly saving without those buyer-specific inputs.

It is worth more only when the exact price difference buys equipment, space, performance or ownership cover that matters to you. Compare like-for-like lifecycle states and derivatives; a current offer and a historical last-listed price are not directly equivalent.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

This CX-60 and Pajero Sport comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CX-60 59 vs Pajero Sport 72.

Efficiency index: CX-60 51 vs Pajero Sport 49.

Safety-equipment index: CX-60 98 vs Pajero Sport 72.

Practicality index: CX-60 68 vs Pajero Sport 71.

Ownership-cover index: CX-60 not separately scored vs Pajero Sport not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.