Mazda CX-60 vs Hyundai EX-8 Van Body

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Mazda CX-60 in South Africa

Mazda CX-60

2.5 Individual Edition Auto AWD Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 902,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 141 kW 🔧 261 Nm ⛽ 13.0 km/l
VS
Hyundai EX-8 Van Body in South Africa

Hyundai EX-8 Van Body

3.9D Van Body 5MT Diesel Current
Price on request
⚡ 103 kW 🔧 373 Nm ⛽ 4.8 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mazda CX-60 vs Hyundai EX-8 Van Body: the short answer

CX-60 and EX-8 Van Body are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CX-60 EX-8 Van Body
Maximum Power CX-60141 kW @ 6000 rpm EX-8 Van Body103 kW @ 2800 rpm
Maximum Torque CX-60261 Nm @ 3000 rpm EX-8 Van Body373 Nm
Engine Size CX-602488 cc EX-8 Van Body3907 cc
Combined Fuel Economy CX-6013.0 km/l EX-8 Van Body4.8 km/l
Ground Clearance CX-60178.8 mm EX-8 Van Body200 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

CX-60

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

EX-8 Van Body

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use

Which One's Right for You?

CX-60

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

EX-8 Van Body

  • Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CX-60 EX-8 Van Body
Model Introduced Year 2023 Current local generation year not confirmed
Generation First-generation KH-series Mazda CX-60 on Mazda's Large Product architecture Current South African EX-8 Van Body listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data.
Facelift History Mazda introduced the CX-60 locally in 2023, added the six-cylinder Takumi in 2024 and revised suspension and drivetrain calibration for the 2025 update. Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle.
Facelift Launched Since 2023 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV Van body truck
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Active active
Segment Premium mid-size SUV Van
Tare Mass Kg 1470 kg 2650 kg
Vehicle Type SUV Van
Color Note - Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering.
Dealer Stock Note - Mid grade in the South Africa lineup
Spec CX-60 EX-8 Van Body
Length 4745 mm 6620 mm
Width 1890 mm 2100 mm
Height 1687.5 mm 2355 mm
Wheelbase 2870 mm 3850 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 178.8 mm 200 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 58 l 100 l
Boot/Cargo Space 477 l -
Kerb Weight 1470 kg 2650 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2342 kg 7800 kg
Payload Capacity 872 kg 5150 kg
Towing Capacity 1500 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Seating Capacity 5 seats 3 seats
Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.85 m Not Officially Disclosed
Front Legroom 1058 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Legroom 990 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) - Not Officially Disclosed
Number of Rows - 2 rows
Front Headroom - Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Headroom - Not Officially Disclosed

In depth: how these cars differ

This CX-60 and EX-8 Van Body comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CX-60 59 vs EX-8 Van Body 58.

Efficiency index: CX-60 51 vs EX-8 Van Body 29.

Safety-equipment index: CX-60 98 vs EX-8 Van Body 94.

Practicality index: CX-60 68 vs EX-8 Van Body 67.

Ownership-cover index: CX-60 not separately scored vs EX-8 Van Body 65.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

CX-60 leads by 6 points

CX-60 and EX-8 Van Body are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 70 /100
Lead 6 points
Data 81% source coverage
70
#1 Evidence leader

CX-60

81% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Efficiency 51
Performance 59
Efficiency 51
Safety 98
Practicality 68
Leads by 6 points
64
#2

EX-8 Van Body

74% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Efficiency 29
Performance 58
Efficiency 29
Safety 94
Practicality 67
Ownership 65
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance CX-60 +1 Efficiency CX-60 +22 Safety CX-60 +4 Practicality CX-60 +1

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

CX-60

Performance 59/100
Efficiency 51/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 68/100

EX-8 Van Body

Performance 58/100
Efficiency 29/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 67/100
Ownership 65/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mazda CX-60 leads the specification evidence index with 70 pts vs 64 pts for EX-8 Van Body

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, CX-60 leads. However, EX-8 Van Body may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

CX-60 vs EX-8 Van Body questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.