Mazda CX-5 vs Hyundai Venue Cargo

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Mazda CX-5 in South Africa

Mazda CX-5

2.0 Carbon Edition Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 688,400 ex-showroom
⚡ 121 kW 🔧 213 Nm ⛽ 14.5 km/l
VS
Hyundai Venue Cargo in South Africa

Hyundai Venue Cargo

1.2 Premium Cargo MT Petrol Current
ZAR 309,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 61 kW 🔧 114 Nm ⛽ 15.4 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mazda CX-5 vs Hyundai Venue Cargo: the short answer

CX-5 and Venue Cargo are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Venue Cargo starts ZAR 260,600 cheaper CX-5 from ZAR 570,500 · Venue Cargo from ZAR 309,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CX-5 Venue Cargo
Maximum Power CX-5121 kW @ 6000 rpm Venue Cargo61 kW
Maximum Torque CX-5213 Nm @ 4000 rpm Venue Cargo114 Nm
Engine Size CX-51998 cc Venue Cargo1197 cc
Combined Fuel Economy CX-514.5 km/l Venue Cargo15.4 km/l
Ground Clearance CX-5200 mm Venue Cargo190 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

CX-5

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

Venue Cargo

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

CX-5

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures

Venue Cargo

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CX-5 Venue Cargo
Model Introduced Year 2017 Current local generation year not confirmed
Generation Second-generation KF-series Mazda CX-5, current outgoing South African range Current South African Venue Cargo listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data.
Facelift History The second generation arrived in 2017 and received a substantial update from 2021. An all-new replacement is scheduled to reach South Africa on 1 August 2026, while this current range remains on sale. Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle.
Facelift Launched Since 2017 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV Panel van
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Active active
Segment Mid-size family SUV Van
Tare Mass Kg 1575 kg 1250 kg
Vehicle Type SUV Van
Color Note - Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering.
Dealer Stock Note - Base grade in the South Africa lineup
Spec CX-5 Venue Cargo
Length 4575 mm 3995 mm
Width 1845 mm 1770 mm
Height 1680 mm 1617 mm
Wheelbase 2700 mm 2500 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 200 mm 190 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 56 l 45 l
Boot/Cargo Space 438 l 1296 l
Kerb Weight 1575 kg 1250 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2065 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Payload Capacity 490 kg 620 kg
Towing Capacity 1000 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Seating Capacity 5 seats 2 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.95 m Not Officially Disclosed
Front Legroom 1041 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Legroom 1007 mm Not Applicable
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) - Not Officially Disclosed
Number of Rows - 1 rows
Front Headroom - Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Headroom - Not Applicable

In depth: how these cars differ

This CX-5 and Venue Cargo comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CX-5 48 vs Venue Cargo 30.

Efficiency index: CX-5 56 vs Venue Cargo 61.

Safety-equipment index: CX-5 88 vs Venue Cargo 89.

Practicality index: CX-5 61 vs Venue Cargo 66.

Ownership-cover index: CX-5 not separately scored vs Venue Cargo 65.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

CX-5 leads by 2 points

CX-5 and Venue Cargo are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 63 /100
Lead 2 points
Data 78% source coverage
63
#1 Evidence leader

CX-5

78% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 88 Check Performance 48
Performance 48
Efficiency 56
Safety 88
Practicality 61
Leads by 2 points
61
#2

Venue Cargo

70% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 89 Check Performance 30
Performance 30
Efficiency 61
Safety 89
Practicality 66
Ownership 65
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance CX-5 +18 Efficiency Venue Cargo +5 Safety Venue Cargo +1 Practicality Venue Cargo +5

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

CX-5

Performance 48/100
Efficiency 56/100
Safety 88/100
Practicality 61/100

Venue Cargo

Performance 30/100
Efficiency 61/100
Safety 89/100
Practicality 66/100
Ownership 65/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mazda CX-5 leads the specification evidence index with 63 pts vs 61 pts for Venue Cargo

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, CX-5 leads. However, Venue Cargo may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

CX-5
CX-5
VS
CX-3
CX-3
CX-5 vs CX-3 →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
Jimny 5-Door
Jimny 5-Door
CX-5 vs Jimny 5-Door →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
Tiggo 4 Cross HEV
Tiggo 4 Cross HEV
CX-5 vs Tiggo 4 Cross HEV →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
Dashing
Dashing
CX-5 vs Dashing →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
Jimny
Jimny
CX-5 vs Jimny →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
Jolion Pro Limited
Jolion Pro Limited
CX-5 vs Jolion Pro Limited →
Venue Cargo
Venue Cargo
VS
CX-3
CX-3
Venue Cargo vs CX-3 →
Venue Cargo
Venue Cargo
VS
Jimny 5-Door
Jimny 5-Door
Venue Cargo vs Jimny 5-Door →

CX-5 vs Venue Cargo questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.