Mazda CX-5 vs Chery Tiggo 9 PHEV

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Mazda CX-5 in South Africa

Mazda CX-5

2.0 Carbon Edition Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 688,400 ex-showroom
⚡ 121 kW 🔧 213 Nm ⛽ 14.5 km/l
VS
Chery Tiggo 9 PHEV in South Africa

Chery Tiggo 9 PHEV

PHEV Vanguard AWD Plug-in Hybrid Current
ZAR 989,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 455 kW 🔧 920 Nm ⛽ 16.1 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Tiggo 9 PHEV
Fuel Economy Tiggo 9 PHEV
🛡 Safety Tiggo 9 PHEV
📦 Practicality Tiggo 9 PHEV
🔑 Ownership Not enough comparable data
CX-5 starts ZAR 269,400 cheaper CX-5 from ZAR 570,500 · Tiggo 9 PHEV from ZAR 839,900

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec CX-5 Tiggo 9 PHEV
Maximum Power 121 kW @ 6000 rpm 455 kW @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque 213 Nm @ 4000 rpm 920 Nm
Engine Size 1998 cc 1500 cc
Combined Fuel Economy 14.5 km/l 16.1 km/l
Ground Clearance 200 mm 183 mm
Boot / Load Bay 438 l 448 l
Airbags 6 Multiple airbags
Kerb Weight 1575 kg -
Seating Capacity 5 seats 7 seats
Warranty 5 Years/Unlimited km 7 Year / 200 000 km

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

Tiggo 9 PHEV holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over CX-5.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Tiggo 9 PHEV +50 pts
Efficiency Tiggo 9 PHEV +16 pts
Safety Tiggo 9 PHEV +6 pts
Practicality Tiggo 9 PHEV +16 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

CX-5

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use
Catalogue-index leader

Tiggo 9 PHEV

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

CX-5

  • Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix

Tiggo 9 PHEV

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CX-5 Tiggo 9 PHEV
Model Introduced Year 2017 2026
Generation Second-generation KF-series Mazda CX-5, current outgoing South African range Current South Africa Tiggo 9 PHEV range
Facelift History The second generation arrived in 2017 and received a substantial update from 2021. An all-new replacement is scheduled to reach South Africa on 1 August 2026, while this current range remains on sale. Current South Africa version listed by official source
Facelift Launched Since 2017 2026
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Active active
Segment Mid-size family SUV SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1575 kg Not Available
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec CX-5 Tiggo 9 PHEV
Length 4575 mm 4810 mm
Width 1845 mm 1925 mm
Height 1680 mm 1741 mm
Wheelbase 2700 mm 2800 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 200 mm 183 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 56 l 70 l
Boot/Cargo Space 438 l 448 l
Kerb Weight 1575 kg -
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2065 kg -
Payload Capacity 490 kg -
Towing Capacity 1000 kg -
Seating Capacity 5 seats 7 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.95 m -
Front Legroom 1041 mm -
Rear Legroom 1007 mm -

Source-backed Catalogue Index

A transparent specification index shown only when every vehicle clears the minimum comparable-data threshold.

Weighted / 100
Catalogue-index readout

Tiggo 9 PHEV leads by 23 points

Tiggo 9 PHEV holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over CX-5.

Index leader 86 /100
Lead 23 points
Data 62% source coverage
86
#1 Index leader

Tiggo 9 PHEV

62% source coverage 4 strong categories
Best at Performance 98 Check Efficiency 72
Performance 98
Efficiency 72
Safety 94
Practicality 77
Leads by 23 points
63
#2

CX-5

78% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 88 Check Performance 48
Performance 48
Efficiency 56
Safety 88
Practicality 61
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Tiggo 9 PHEV +50 Efficiency Tiggo 9 PHEV +16 Safety Tiggo 9 PHEV +6 Practicality Tiggo 9 PHEV +16

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Catalogue-index leader

Tiggo 9 PHEV

Performance 98/100
Efficiency 72/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 77/100

CX-5

Performance 48/100
Efficiency 56/100
Safety 88/100
Practicality 61/100

How to Read This Comparison

🏆 Chery Tiggo 9 PHEV leads the catalogue index with 86 pts vs 63 pts for CX-5

In Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index, Tiggo 9 PHEV leads. However, CX-5 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.

Hagalu does not publish a guaranteed resale winner. Depreciation depends on age, mileage, condition, derivative, colour, supply and demand. Compare several current used-market listings and obtain trade-in valuations for equivalent examples before relying on a resale estimate.

Check the exact derivatives for drive type, ground clearance, tyres, approach and departure angles, wading depth and low-range gearing where officially disclosed. SUV styling or all-wheel drive alone does not prove that a vehicle is suitable for demanding off-road use.

Calculate each exact derivative using your monthly distance and a current fuel or electricity price, then add finance, insurance, scheduled service, tyres and licence costs. Hagalu does not claim a fixed monthly saving without those buyer-specific inputs.

It is worth more only when the exact price difference buys equipment, space, performance or ownership cover that matters to you. Compare like-for-like lifecycle states and derivatives; a current offer and a historical last-listed price are not directly equivalent.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

This CX-5 and Tiggo 9 PHEV comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CX-5 48 vs Tiggo 9 PHEV 98.

Efficiency index: CX-5 56 vs Tiggo 9 PHEV 72.

Safety-equipment index: CX-5 88 vs Tiggo 9 PHEV 94.

Practicality index: CX-5 61 vs Tiggo 9 PHEV 77.

Ownership-cover index: CX-5 not separately scored vs Tiggo 9 PHEV not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.