Mazda CX-5 vs Mazda Mazda3

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Mazda CX-5 in South Africa

Mazda CX-5

2.0 Carbon Edition Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 688,400 ex-showroom
⚡ 121 kW 🔧 213 Nm ⛽ 14.5 km/l
VS
Mazda Mazda3 in South Africa

Mazda Mazda3

2.0 Astina Edition Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 629,700 ex-showroom
⚡ 121 kW 🔧 213 Nm ⛽ 15.9 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mazda CX-5 vs Mazda Mazda3: the short answer

CX-5 and Mazda3 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Mazda3 starts ZAR 72,200 cheaper CX-5 from ZAR 570,500 · Mazda3 from ZAR 498,300

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CX-5 Mazda3
Maximum Power CX-5121 kW @ 6000 rpm Mazda3121 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque CX-5213 Nm @ 4000 rpm Mazda3213 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Engine Size CX-51998 cc Mazda31998 cc
Combined Fuel Economy CX-514.5 km/l Mazda315.9 km/l
Ground Clearance CX-5200 mm Mazda3140 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Mazda CX-5

2.0 Carbon Edition Auto FWD

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Mazda Mazda3

2.0 Astina Edition Auto FWD

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

CX-5

Strengths
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader

Mazda3

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

CX-5

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Mazda3

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CX-5 Mazda3
Model Introduced Year 2017 2019
Generation Second-generation KF-series Mazda CX-5, current outgoing South African range Seventh-generation BP-series Mazda3 hatchback
Facelift History The second generation arrived in 2017 and received a substantial update from 2021. An all-new replacement is scheduled to reach South Africa on 1 August 2026, while this current range remains on sale. The seventh-generation South African hatchback launched in 2019 and the current range has since been consolidated to Dynamic and Astina editions.
Facelift Launched Since 2017 2019
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV Hatchback
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Active Active
Segment Mid-size family SUV C-segment hatchback
Tare Mass Kg 1575 kg 1350 kg
Vehicle Type SUV Hatchback
Spec CX-5 Mazda3
Length 4575 mm 4460 mm
Width 1845 mm 1795 mm
Height 1680 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase 2700 mm 2725 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 200 mm 140 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 56 l 51 l
Boot/Cargo Space 438 l 295 l
Kerb Weight 1575 kg 1350 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2065 kg 1870 kg
Payload Capacity 490 kg 520 kg
Towing Capacity 1000 kg 1000 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.95 m 5.3 m
Front Legroom 1041 mm 1075 mm
Rear Legroom 1007 mm 891 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This CX-5 and Mazda3 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CX-5 48 vs Mazda3 50.

Efficiency index: CX-5 56 vs Mazda3 61.

Safety-equipment index: CX-5 88 vs Mazda3 96.

Practicality index: CX-5 61 vs Mazda3 50.

Ownership-cover index: CX-5 not separately scored vs Mazda3 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Mazda3 leads by 1 points

CX-5 and Mazda3 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 64 /100
Lead 1 points
Data 77% source coverage
64
#1 Evidence leader

Mazda3

77% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 96 Check Performance 50
Performance 50
Efficiency 61
Safety 96
Practicality 50
Leads by 1 points
63
#2

CX-5

78% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 88 Check Performance 48
Performance 48
Efficiency 56
Safety 88
Practicality 61
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Mazda3 +2 Efficiency Mazda3 +5 Safety Mazda3 +8 Practicality CX-5 +11

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Mazda3

Performance 50/100
Efficiency 61/100
Safety 96/100
Practicality 50/100

CX-5

Performance 48/100
Efficiency 56/100
Safety 88/100
Practicality 61/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mazda Mazda3 leads the specification evidence index with 64 pts vs 63 pts for CX-5

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Mazda3 leads. However, CX-5 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

CX-5
CX-5
VS
Territory
Territory
CX-5 vs Territory →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
Eclipse Cross
Eclipse Cross
CX-5 vs Eclipse Cross →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
Tiggo 8 Pro
Tiggo 8 Pro
CX-5 vs Tiggo 8 Pro →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
CX-30
CX-30
CX-5 vs CX-30 →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
DOLPHIN
DOLPHIN
CX-5 vs DOLPHIN →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
C7
C7
CX-5 vs C7 →
Mazda3
Mazda3
VS
Territory
Territory
Mazda3 vs Territory →
Mazda3
Mazda3
VS
Eclipse Cross
Eclipse Cross
Mazda3 vs Eclipse Cross →

CX-5 vs Mazda3 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.