Mazda CX-5 vs BMW iX

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Mazda CX-5 in South Africa

Mazda CX-5

2.0 Carbon Edition Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 688,400 ex-showroom
⚡ 121 kW 🔧 213 Nm ⛽ 14.5 km/l
VS
BMW iX in South Africa

BMW iX

xDrive45 Sport Electric Single-Speed Reduction Gear Current
ZAR 2,249,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 300 kW 🔧 700 Nm
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mazda CX-5 vs BMW iX: the short answer

iX has a large lead in Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index over CX-5.

CX-5 starts ZAR 1,678,500 cheaper CX-5 from ZAR 570,500 · iX from ZAR 2,249,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CX-5 iX
Maximum Power CX-5121 kW @ 6000 rpm iX300 kW
Maximum Torque CX-5213 Nm @ 4000 rpm iX700 Nm
Engine Size CX-51998 cc iXNot Applicable
Combined Fuel Economy CX-514.5 km/l iXNot Applicable
Ground Clearance CX-5200 mm iX190 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

CX-5

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use
Specification evidence leader

iX

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

CX-5

  • Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix

iX

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CX-5 iX
Model Introduced Year 2017 2021
Generation Second-generation KF-series Mazda CX-5, current outgoing South African range Large five-door battery-electric SUV with dual-motor all-wheel drive.
Facelift History The second generation arrived in 2017 and received a substantial update from 2021. An all-new replacement is scheduled to reach South Africa on 1 August 2026, while this current range remains on sale. Current BMW iX range in updated xDrive45 and xDrive60 South African Sport specification.
Facelift Launched Since 2017 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Active active
Segment Mid-size family SUV Premium SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1575 kg -
Vehicle Type SUV Car
Spec CX-5 iX
Length 4575 mm 4965 mm
Width 1845 mm 1970 mm
Height 1680 mm 1695 mm
Wheelbase 2700 mm 3000 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 200 mm 190 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 56 l 0 l
Boot/Cargo Space 438 l 500 l
Kerb Weight 1575 kg 2525 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2065 kg 3100 kg
Payload Capacity 490 kg 650 kg
Towing Capacity 1000 kg 2500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.95 m 5.8 m
Front Legroom 1041 mm 1045 mm
Rear Legroom 1007 mm 920 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) - 170 mm
Number of Rows - 2 rows
Front Headroom - 1009 mm
Rear Headroom - 991 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This CX-5 and iX comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CX-5 48 vs iX 100.

Efficiency index: CX-5 56 vs iX 90.

Safety-equipment index: CX-5 88 vs iX 92.

Practicality index: CX-5 61 vs iX 72.

Ownership-cover index: CX-5 not separately scored vs iX not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

iX leads by 26 points

iX has a large lead in Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index over CX-5.

Evidence leader 89 /100
Lead 26 points
Data 69% source coverage
89
#1 Evidence leader

iX

69% source coverage 4 strong categories
Best at Performance 100 Check Practicality 72
Performance 100
Efficiency 90
Safety 92
Practicality 72
Leads by 26 points
63
#2

CX-5

78% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 88 Check Performance 48
Performance 48
Efficiency 56
Safety 88
Practicality 61
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance iX +52 Efficiency iX +34 Safety iX +4 Practicality iX +11

Large difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

iX

Performance 100/100
Efficiency 90/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 72/100

CX-5

Performance 48/100
Efficiency 56/100
Safety 88/100
Practicality 61/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index BMW iX leads the specification evidence index with 89 pts vs 63 pts for CX-5

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, iX leads. However, CX-5 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

CX-5
CX-5
VS
GLC Coupé
GLC Coupé
CX-5 vs GLC Coupé →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
Touareg
Touareg
CX-5 vs Touareg →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
RX
RX
CX-5 vs RX →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
iX2
iX2
CX-5 vs iX2 →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
Santa Fe Hybrid
Santa Fe Hybrid
CX-5 vs Santa Fe Hybrid →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
iX1
iX1
CX-5 vs iX1 →
iX
iX
VS
GLC Coupé
GLC Coupé
iX vs GLC Coupé →
iX
iX
VS
Touareg
Touareg
iX vs Touareg →

CX-5 vs iX questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.