Mazda CX-30 vs Hyundai i30

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Hyundai i30 Discontinued model
Mazda CX-30 in South Africa

Mazda CX-30

2.0 Individual Edition Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 651,500 ex-showroom
⚡ 121 kW 🔧 213 Nm ⛽ 15.2 km/l
VS
Hyundai i30 in South Africa

Hyundai i30

1.0T Fluid Petrol 7-Speed DCT Discontinued model
ZAR 468,900 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 88 kW 🔧 172 Nm ⛽ 16.9 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mazda CX-30 vs Hyundai i30: the short answer

CX-30 and i30 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Recorded price context CX-30: current from ZAR 539,800 · i30: last listed from ZAR 432,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CX-30 i30
Maximum Power CX-30121 kW @ 6000 rpm i3088 kW @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque CX-30213 Nm @ 4000 rpm i30172 Nm @ 1500 rpm
Engine Size CX-301998 cc i30998 cc
Combined Fuel Economy CX-3015.2 km/l i3016.9 km/l
Ground Clearance CX-30175 mm i30135 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Mazda CX-30

2.0 Individual Edition Auto FWD

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Hyundai i30

1.0T Fluid

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

CX-30

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

i30

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

CX-30

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

i30

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec CX-30 i30
Model Introduced Year 2021 2007
Generation First-generation DM-series Mazda CX-30 using seventh-generation Mazda architecture Third generation i30 on Hyundai's i-GMP-derived platform; the N Performance uses a more heavily engineered chassis with limited-slip differential and performance suspension
Facelift History South African editions received a focused technology and equipment update in 2024, including the 10.25-inch display and revised connectivity. Third generation launched globally in 2017; N Performance model arrived in SA as a standalone performance derivative; third gen has received ongoing tech updates
Facelift Launched Since 2021 2017
Facelift Version Ending Current Not confirmed
Body Style SUV Hatchback
Model Year 2026 Not confirmed
Production Status Active discontinued
Segment Compact crossover Hatchback
Tare Mass Kg 1340 kg 1285 kg
Vehicle Type SUV Hatchback
Spec CX-30 i30
Length 4395 mm 4340 mm
Width 1795 mm 1795 mm
Height 1540 mm 1455 mm
Wheelbase 2655 mm 2650 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 175 mm 135 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 51 l 50 l
Boot/Cargo Space 295 l 395 l
Kerb Weight 1340 kg 1285 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1937 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Payload Capacity 597 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Towing Capacity 1200 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.7 m Not Officially Disclosed
Front Legroom 1058 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Legroom 921 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) - Not Officially Disclosed
Number of Rows - 2 rows
Front Headroom - Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Headroom - Not Officially Disclosed

In depth: how these cars differ

This CX-30 and i30 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CX-30 49 vs i30 39.

Efficiency index: CX-30 59 vs i30 66.

Safety-equipment index: CX-30 96 vs i30 84.

Practicality index: CX-30 55 vs i30 60.

Ownership-cover index: CX-30 not separately scored vs i30 65.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

CX-30 leads by 3 points

CX-30 and i30 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 65 /100
Lead 3 points
Data 78% source coverage
65
#1 Evidence leader

CX-30

78% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 96 Check Performance 49
Performance 49
Efficiency 59
Safety 96
Practicality 55
Leads by 3 points
62
#2

i30

90% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 84 Check Performance 39
Performance 39
Efficiency 66
Safety 84
Practicality 60
Ownership 65
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance CX-30 +10 Efficiency i30 +7 Safety CX-30 +12 Practicality i30 +5

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

CX-30

Performance 49/100
Efficiency 59/100
Safety 96/100
Practicality 55/100

i30

Performance 39/100
Efficiency 66/100
Safety 84/100
Practicality 60/100
Ownership 65/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mazda CX-30 leads the specification evidence index with 65 pts vs 62 pts for i30

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, CX-30 leads. However, i30 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

CX-30
CX-30
VS
FRIDAY REEV
FRIDAY REEV
CX-30 vs FRIDAY REEV →
CX-30
CX-30
VS
HR-V
HR-V
CX-30 vs HR-V →
CX-30
CX-30
VS
Destinator
Destinator
CX-30 vs Destinator →
CX-30
CX-30
VS
Scorpio-N
Scorpio-N
CX-30 vs Scorpio-N →
CX-30
CX-30
VS
Duster
Duster
CX-30 vs Duster →
CX-30
CX-30
VS
XUV700
XUV700
CX-30 vs XUV700 →
i30
i30Discontinued
VS
FRIDAY REEV
FRIDAY REEV
i30 vs FRIDAY REEV →
i30
i30Discontinued
VS
HR-V
HR-V
i30 vs HR-V →

CX-30 vs i30 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.