Mazda CX-3 vs Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace Discontinued model
Mazda CX-3 in South Africa

Mazda CX-3

2.0 Individual Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 551,600 ex-showroom
⚡ 115 kW 🔧 206 Nm ⛽ 15.9 km/l
VS
Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace in South Africa

Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace

2.0 TSI 162kW R-Line 4Motion DSG Petrol 7-Speed DCT Discontinued model
ZAR 934,700 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 162 kW 🔧 350 Nm ⛽ 12.5 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mazda CX-3 vs Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace: the short answer

Tiguan Allspace has a modest catalogue-index lead, while CX-3 remains close.

Recorded price context CX-3: current from ZAR 440,000 · Tiguan Allspace: last listed from ZAR 701,600

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CX-3 Tiguan Allspace
Maximum Power CX-3115 kW @ 6000 rpm Tiguan Allspace162 kW
Maximum Torque CX-3206 Nm @ 2800 rpm Tiguan Allspace350 Nm
Engine Size CX-31998 cc Tiguan Allspace1984 cc
Combined Fuel Economy CX-315.9 km/l Tiguan Allspace12.5 km/l
Ground Clearance CX-3155 mm Tiguan Allspace198 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Evidence for Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace 2.0 TSI 162kW R-Line 4Motion DSG

Source type: Hagalu catalogue record

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

CX-3

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

Tiguan Allspace

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

CX-3

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Tiguan Allspace

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec CX-3 Tiguan Allspace
Model Introduced Year 2015 2017
Generation Current first-generation DK-series Mazda CX-3 Second generation Tiguan Allspace (AD/AN) on MQB platform
Facelift History The CX-3 has received successive equipment and design updates since its 2015 debut; Carbon and Individual now sit together at the top of the South African range. Mid-cycle facelift in 2021 with IQ.Drive safety tech and updated infotainment
Facelift Launched Since 2015 2021
Facelift Version Ending Current Not confirmed
Body Style SUV Not confirmed
Model Year 2026 Not confirmed
Production Status Active Not confirmed
Segment Compact crossover Not confirmed
Tare Mass Kg 1270 kg 1640 kg
Vehicle Type SUV Not confirmed
Spec CX-3 Tiguan Allspace
Length 4275 mm 4703 mm
Width 1765 mm 1839 mm
Height 1542 mm 1674 mm
Wheelbase 2570 mm 2790 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 155 mm 198 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 48 l 57 l
Boot/Cargo Space 230 l 230 l
Kerb Weight 1270 kg 1640 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1735 kg 2220 kg
Payload Capacity 465 kg Not confirmed
Towing Capacity 850 kg 2000 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 7 seats
Doors 5 doors Not confirmed
Minimum Turning Radius 5.7 m 5.5 m
Front Legroom 1058 mm Not confirmed
Rear Legroom 888 mm Not confirmed

In depth: how these cars differ

This CX-3 and Tiguan Allspace comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CX-3 47 vs Tiguan Allspace 75.

Efficiency index: CX-3 61 vs Tiguan Allspace 49.

Safety-equipment index: CX-3 84 vs Tiguan Allspace 98.

Practicality index: CX-3 48 vs Tiguan Allspace 66.

Ownership-cover index: CX-3 not separately scored vs Tiguan Allspace not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Tiguan Allspace leads by 13 points

Tiguan Allspace has a modest catalogue-index lead, while CX-3 remains close.

Evidence leader 73 /100
Lead 13 points
Data 78% source coverage
73
#1 Evidence leader

Tiguan Allspace

78% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Efficiency 49
Performance 75
Efficiency 49
Safety 98
Practicality 66
Leads by 13 points
60
#2

CX-3

71% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 84 Check Performance 47
Performance 47
Efficiency 61
Safety 84
Practicality 48
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Tiguan Allspace +28 Efficiency CX-3 +12 Safety Tiguan Allspace +14 Practicality Tiguan Allspace +18

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Tiguan Allspace

Performance 75/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 66/100

CX-3

Performance 47/100
Efficiency 61/100
Safety 84/100
Practicality 48/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace leads the specification evidence index with 73 pts vs 60 pts for CX-3

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Tiguan Allspace leads. However, CX-3 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

CX-3 vs Tiguan Allspace questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.