Mazda CX-3 vs Tata Harrier

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Mazda CX-3 in South Africa

Mazda CX-3

2.0 Individual Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 551,600 ex-showroom
⚡ 115 kW 🔧 206 Nm ⛽ 15.9 km/l
VS
Tata Harrier in South Africa

Tata Harrier

Fearless+ DT AT Diesel 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 699,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 125 kW 🔧 350 Nm ⛽ 15.15 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mazda CX-3 vs Tata Harrier: the short answer

Harrier has a modest catalogue-index lead, while CX-3 remains close.

CX-3 starts ZAR 109,900 cheaper CX-3 from ZAR 440,000 · Harrier from ZAR 549,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CX-3 Harrier
Maximum Power CX-3115 kW @ 6000 rpm Harrier125 kW @ 3750 rpm
Maximum Torque CX-3206 Nm @ 2800 rpm Harrier350 Nm @ 1750-2500 rpm
Engine Size CX-31998 cc Harrier1956 cc
Combined Fuel Economy CX-315.9 km/l Harrier15.15 km/l
Ground Clearance CX-3155 mm Harrier205 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

CX-3

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

Harrier

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

CX-3

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Harrier

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CX-3 Harrier
Model Introduced Year 2015 2025
Generation Current first-generation DK-series Mazda CX-3 Current-generation South African-market Tata Harrier five-seat SUV
Facelift History The CX-3 has received successive equipment and design updates since its 2015 debut; Carbon and Individual now sit together at the top of the South African range. Introduced with Tata Passenger Vehicles' South African return in 2025; no South African facelift has been announced
Facelift Launched Since 2015 2025
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Active Active
Segment Compact crossover Mid-size SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1270 kg -
Vehicle Type SUV Passenger Car
Spec CX-3 Harrier
Length 4275 mm 4605 mm
Width 1765 mm 1922 mm
Height 1542 mm 1718 mm
Wheelbase 2570 mm 2741 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 155 mm 205 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 48 l 50 l
Boot/Cargo Space 230 l 445 l
Kerb Weight 1270 kg 1823 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1735 kg 2298 kg
Payload Capacity 465 kg 475 kg
Towing Capacity 850 kg 0 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.7 m 5.8 m
Front Legroom 1058 mm 840 mm
Rear Legroom 888 mm 980 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) - 150 mm
Number of Rows - 2 rows
Front Headroom - 1020 mm
Rear Headroom - 950 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This CX-3 and Harrier comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CX-3 47 vs Harrier 60.

Efficiency index: CX-3 61 vs Harrier 59.

Safety-equipment index: CX-3 84 vs Harrier 99.

Practicality index: CX-3 48 vs Harrier 67.

Ownership-cover index: CX-3 not separately scored vs Harrier not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Harrier leads by 12 points

Harrier has a modest catalogue-index lead, while CX-3 remains close.

Evidence leader 72 /100
Lead 12 points
Data 75% source coverage
72
#1 Evidence leader

Harrier

75% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 99 Check Efficiency 59
Performance 60
Efficiency 59
Safety 99
Practicality 67
Leads by 12 points
60
#2

CX-3

71% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 84 Check Performance 47
Performance 47
Efficiency 61
Safety 84
Practicality 48
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Harrier +13 Efficiency CX-3 +2 Safety Harrier +15 Practicality Harrier +19

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Harrier

Performance 60/100
Efficiency 59/100
Safety 99/100
Practicality 67/100

CX-3

Performance 47/100
Efficiency 61/100
Safety 84/100
Practicality 48/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Tata Harrier leads the specification evidence index with 72 pts vs 60 pts for CX-3

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Harrier leads. However, CX-3 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

CX-3
CX-3
VS
XUV700
XUV700
CX-3 vs XUV700 →
CX-3
CX-3
VS
06
06
CX-3 vs 06 →
CX-3
CX-3
VS
ALCAZAR
ALCAZAR
CX-3 vs ALCAZAR →
CX-3
CX-3
VS
HS
HS
CX-3 vs HS →
CX-3
CX-3
VS
Scorpio-N
Scorpio-N
CX-3 vs Scorpio-N →
CX-3
CX-3
VS
Duster
Duster
CX-3 vs Duster →
Harrier
Harrier
VS
XUV700
XUV700
Harrier vs XUV700 →
Harrier
Harrier
VS
06
06
Harrier vs 06 →

CX-3 vs Harrier questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.