Mazda CX-3 vs Mahindra XUV700

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Mazda CX-3 in South Africa

Mazda CX-3

2.0 Individual Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 551,600 ex-showroom
⚡ 115 kW 🔧 206 Nm ⛽ 15.9 km/l
VS
Mahindra XUV700 in South Africa

Mahindra XUV700

AX7L BE Automatic Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 627,899 ex-showroom
⚡ 149 kW 🔧 380 Nm ⛽ 13 km/l
Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mazda CX-3 vs Mahindra XUV700: the short answer

XUV700 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while CX-3 remains close.

CX-3 starts ZAR 55,199 cheaper CX-3 from ZAR 440,000 · XUV700 from ZAR 495,199

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CX-3 XUV700
Maximum Power CX-3115 kW @ 6000 rpm XUV700149 kW @ 5000 rpm
Maximum Torque CX-3206 Nm @ 2800 rpm XUV700380 Nm
Engine Size CX-31998 cc XUV7001997 cc
Combined Fuel Economy CX-315.9 km/l XUV70013 km/l
Ground Clearance CX-3155 mm XUV700200 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

CX-3

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

XUV700

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

CX-3

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

XUV700

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CX-3 XUV700
Model Introduced Year 2015 Not Available
Generation Current first-generation DK-series Mazda CX-3 Current local listing
Facelift History The CX-3 has received successive equipment and design updates since its 2015 debut; Carbon and Individual now sit together at the top of the South African range. Not listed by current South African source page.
Facelift Launched Since 2015 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 Current
Production Status Active Active
Segment Compact crossover SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1270 kg 2040 kg
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec CX-3 XUV700
Length 4275 mm 4695 mm
Width 1765 mm 1890 mm
Height 1542 mm 1755 mm
Wheelbase 2570 mm 2750 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 155 mm 200 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 48 l 60 l
Boot/Cargo Space 230 l 240 l
Kerb Weight 1270 kg 2040 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1735 kg -
Payload Capacity 465 kg -
Towing Capacity 850 kg -
Seating Capacity 5 seats 7 seats
Doors 5 doors -
Minimum Turning Radius 5.7 m -
Front Legroom 1058 mm -
Rear Legroom 888 mm -

In depth: how these cars differ

This CX-3 and XUV700 comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CX-3 47 vs XUV700 66.

Efficiency index: CX-3 61 vs XUV700 53.

Safety-equipment index: CX-3 84 vs XUV700 94.

Practicality index: CX-3 48 vs XUV700 67.

Ownership-cover index: CX-3 not separately scored vs XUV700 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

XUV700 leads by 11 points

XUV700 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while CX-3 remains close.

Evidence leader 71 /100
Lead 11 points
Data 58% source coverage
71
#1 Evidence leader

XUV700

58% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Efficiency 53
Performance 66
Efficiency 53
Safety 94
Practicality 67
Leads by 11 points
60
#2

CX-3

71% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 84 Check Performance 47
Performance 47
Efficiency 61
Safety 84
Practicality 48
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance XUV700 +19 Efficiency CX-3 +8 Safety XUV700 +10 Practicality XUV700 +19

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

XUV700

Performance 66/100
Efficiency 53/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 67/100

CX-3

Performance 47/100
Efficiency 61/100
Safety 84/100
Practicality 48/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mahindra XUV700 leads the specification evidence index with 71 pts vs 60 pts for CX-3

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, XUV700 leads. However, CX-3 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

CX-3 vs XUV700 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.