Tata Harrier vs Mahindra XUV700

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Tata Harrier in South Africa

Tata Harrier

Fearless+ DT AT Diesel 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 699,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 125 kW 🔧 350 Nm ⛽ 15.15 km/l
VS
Mahindra XUV700 in South Africa

Mahindra XUV700

AX7L BE Automatic Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 627,899 ex-showroom
⚡ 149 kW 🔧 380 Nm ⛽ 13 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Tata Harrier vs Mahindra XUV700: the short answer

Harrier and XUV700 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

XUV700 starts ZAR 54,701 cheaper Harrier from ZAR 549,900 · XUV700 from ZAR 495,199

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Harrier XUV700
Maximum Power Harrier125 kW @ 3750 rpm XUV700149 kW @ 5000 rpm
Maximum Torque Harrier350 Nm @ 1750-2500 rpm XUV700380 Nm
Engine Size Harrier1956 cc XUV7001997 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Harrier15.15 km/l XUV70013 km/l
Ground Clearance Harrier205 mm XUV700200 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

Harrier

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

XUV700

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance

Which One's Right for You?

Harrier

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

XUV700

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Harrier XUV700
Model Introduced Year 2025 Not Available
Generation Current-generation South African-market Tata Harrier five-seat SUV Current local listing
Facelift History Introduced with Tata Passenger Vehicles' South African return in 2025; no South African facelift has been announced Not listed by current South African source page.
Facelift Launched Since 2025 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 Current
Production Status Active Active
Segment Mid-size SUV SUV
Vehicle Type Passenger Car SUV
Tare Mass Kg - 2040 kg
Spec Harrier XUV700
Length 4605 mm 4695 mm
Width 1922 mm 1890 mm
Height 1718 mm 1755 mm
Wheelbase 2741 mm 2750 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 205 mm 200 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 150 mm -
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 l 60 l
Boot/Cargo Space 445 l 240 l
Kerb Weight 1823 kg 2040 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2298 kg -
Payload Capacity 475 kg -
Towing Capacity 0 kg -
Seating Capacity 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows -
Doors 5 doors -
Minimum Turning Radius 5.8 m -
Front Headroom 1020 mm -
Rear Headroom 950 mm -
Front Legroom 840 mm -
Rear Legroom 980 mm -

In depth: how these cars differ

This Harrier and XUV700 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Harrier 60 vs XUV700 66.

Efficiency index: Harrier 59 vs XUV700 53.

Safety-equipment index: Harrier 99 vs XUV700 94.

Practicality index: Harrier 67 vs XUV700 67.

Ownership-cover index: Harrier not separately scored vs XUV700 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Harrier leads by 1 points

Harrier and XUV700 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 72 /100
Lead 1 points
Data 75% source coverage
72
#1 Evidence leader

Harrier

75% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 99 Check Efficiency 59
Performance 60
Efficiency 59
Safety 99
Practicality 67
Leads by 1 points
71
#2

XUV700

58% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Efficiency 53
Performance 66
Efficiency 53
Safety 94
Practicality 67
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance XUV700 +6 Efficiency Harrier +6 Safety Harrier +5 Practicality Level

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Harrier

Performance 60/100
Efficiency 59/100
Safety 99/100
Practicality 67/100

XUV700

Performance 66/100
Efficiency 53/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 67/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Tata Harrier leads the specification evidence index with 72 pts vs 71 pts for XUV700

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Harrier leads. However, XUV700 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Harrier vs XUV700 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.