Rolls-Royce Cullinan vs Jetour T1 i-DM

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Rolls-Royce Cullinan in South Africa

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Cullinan Series II Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
Price on request
⚡ 420 kW 🔧 850 Nm ⛽ 5.95 km/l
VS
Jetour T1 i-DM in South Africa

Jetour T1 i-DM

T1 i-DM Plug-in Hybrid Current
ZAR 689,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 100 kW 🔧 220 Nm ⛽ 90.9 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Cullinan
Fuel Economy T1 i-DM
🛡 Safety Cullinan
📦 Practicality Cullinan
🔑 Ownership T1 i-DM

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec Cullinan T1 i-DM
Maximum Power 420 kW @ 5000-6000 rpm 100 kW @ 5200 rpm
Maximum Torque 850 Nm @ 1600-4250 rpm 220 Nm @ 2500 rpm
Engine Size 6749 cc 1499 cc
Claimed Mileage 5.95 km/l 90.9 km/l
Ground Clearance 173 mm 190 mm
Boot / Load Bay 612 l 574 l
Airbags 8 Front, front side, and front/rear curtain airbags
Kerb Weight 2725 kg 2000 kg
Seating Capacity - -
Warranty 4 years; regional conditions apply 7-year/200,000 km vehicle warranty

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

Both Cullinan and T1 i-DM are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Cullinan +58 pts
Efficiency T1 i-DM +70 pts
Safety Cullinan +5 pts
Practicality Cullinan +4 pts
Ownership T1 i-DM +18 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

🏆 Overall Winner

Cullinan

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: Highway Driving Family Usage

T1 i-DM

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best suited to: Fuel Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Cullinan

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

T1 i-DM

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Cullinan T1 i-DM
Model Introduced Year 2018 2026
Generation Cullinan Series II, the current evolution of the marque's five-door super-luxury SUV Current local listing
Facelift History Cullinan was introduced in South Africa in 2018 and received its most extensive evolution as Cullinan Series II in May 2024 Not listed by current South African source page.
Facelift Launched Since 2024 2026
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Five-door luxury SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 Current
Production Status active Active
Segment Full-size super-luxury SUV SUV
Vehicle Type Internal-combustion sport utility vehicle SUV
Gross Combined Mass Kg - 3948 kg
Tare Mass Kg - 2000 kg
Spec Cullinan T1 i-DM
Drivetrain Layout All-wheel drive with all-wheel steering 2WD
Transfer Case ATC 13 transfer case Not Applicable
Differential Lock No lockable differential Not Applicable
Paddle Shifters No Not Applicable
Gearbox 8-speed ZF automatic Automatic
Final Drive Ratio 2.81:1 Not Applicable
Number of Gears 8 Not Applicable
Transmission Type 8-speed ZF automatic Automatic
Clutch Type Torque converter Not Applicable
Drivetrain All-wheel drive 2WD
4WD Engagement Everywhere off-road capability engaged by one button Not Applicable
4WD Hi Range Not Applicable Not Applicable
4WD Lo Range Not Applicable Not Applicable
4WD Selector Everywhere button Not Applicable
Automatic Shift Paddles No Not Applicable
Front Differential Lock Not Applicable Not Applicable
Gearbox Type 8-speed ZF automatic Automatic
Low Range Ratio Not Applicable Not Applicable
Low Range Not Applicable Not Applicable
Axle Layout All-wheel-drive power delivery with active rear-axle steering 2WD
Rear Differential Lock Not Applicable Not Applicable
Transmission Speeds 8 Not Applicable
Gear Shift Type Satellite Aided automatic gear selection Not Applicable
LSD Available - Not Applicable
Gear Shift Indicator - Not Applicable

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

Cullinan leads by 1 points

Both Cullinan and T1 i-DM are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Winner 73 /100
Lead 1 points
Data 94% confidence
73
#1 Winner

Cullinan

94% data confidence 3 strong categories
Best at Performance 99 Check Efficiency 28
Performance 99
Efficiency 28
Safety 99
Practicality 75
Ownership 44
Leads by 1 points
72
#2

T1 i-DM

78% data confidence 3 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 98 Check Performance 41
Performance 41
Efficiency 98
Safety 94
Practicality 71
Ownership 62
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Cullinan +58 Efficiency T1 i-DM +70 Safety Cullinan +5 Practicality Cullinan +4 Ownership T1 i-DM +18

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

Cullinan

Performance 99/100
Efficiency 28/100
Safety 99/100
Practicality 75/100
Ownership 44/100

T1 i-DM

Performance 41/100
Efficiency 98/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 71/100
Ownership 62/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 Rolls-Royce Cullinan wins with 73 pts vs 72 pts for T1 i-DM

In structured scoring, Cullinan emerges as the stronger overall package. However, T1 i-DM may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the Cullinan edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: Cullinan 28 vs T1 i-DM 98. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: Cullinan 99, T1 i-DM 94. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: Cullinan 44, T1 i-DM 62. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: Cullinan 75, T1 i-DM 71. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: Cullinan 99, T1 i-DM 41. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The Cullinan edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The Cullinan scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between Cullinan and T1 i-DM in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Cullinan scores 99 vs 41.

Efficiency: Cullinan scores 28 vs 98.

Safety: Cullinan scores 99 vs 94.

Practicality: Cullinan scores 75 vs 71.

Ownership: Cullinan scores 44 vs 62.

Final structured scoring gives Cullinan the advantage in this comparison.