Rolls-Royce Cullinan vs GWM ORA 5

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Rolls-Royce Cullinan in South Africa

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Cullinan Series II Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
Price on request
⚡ 420 kW 🔧 850 Nm ⛽ 5.95 km/l
VS
GWM ORA 5 in South Africa

GWM ORA 5

BEV Ultra Luxury Electric Current
ZAR 599,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 150 kW 🔧 260 Nm
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Rolls-Royce Cullinan vs GWM ORA 5: the short answer

Cullinan has a modest catalogue-index lead, while ORA 5 remains close.

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Cullinan ORA 5
Maximum Power Cullinan420 kW @ 5000-6000 rpm ORA 5150 kW
Maximum Torque Cullinan850 Nm @ 1600-4250 rpm ORA 5260 Nm
Engine Size Cullinan6749 cc ORA 5Not Applicable
Combined Fuel Economy Cullinan5.95 km/l ORA 5Not Applicable
Ground Clearance Cullinan173 mm ORA 5175 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Cullinan Series II

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

GWM ORA 5

BEV Ultra Luxury

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

Cullinan

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

ORA 5

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Cullinan

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

ORA 5

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Cullinan ORA 5
Model Introduced Year 2018 2026
Generation Cullinan Series II, the current evolution of the marque's five-door super-luxury SUV First-generation ORA 5; South African launch specification
Facelift History Cullinan was introduced in South Africa in 2018 and received its most extensive evolution as Cullinan Series II in May 2024 No facelift; first South African model year
Facelift Launched Since 2024 Not Applicable
Facelift Version Ending Current Not Applicable
Body Style Five-door luxury SUV Compact SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active On sale
Segment Full-size super-luxury SUV Compact SUV
Vehicle Type Internal-combustion sport utility vehicle Passenger vehicle
Spec Cullinan ORA 5
Length 5355 mm 4471 mm
Width 2000 mm 1833 mm
Height 1835 mm 1641 mm
Wheelbase 3295 mm 2720 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 173 mm 175 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 173 mm 115 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 90 l 0 l
Boot/Cargo Space 612 l 228 l
Kerb Weight 2725 kg 1555 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 3300 kg 1970 kg
Payload Capacity 575 kg 415 kg
Towing Capacity 2700 kg 2000 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 6.6 m 5.6 m
Front Headroom 1064 mm 1000 mm
Rear Headroom 1026 mm 960 mm
Front Legroom 1006 mm 1050 mm
Rear Legroom 1090 mm 900 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Cullinan and ORA 5 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Cullinan 99 vs ORA 5 56.

Efficiency index: Cullinan 28 vs ORA 5 90.

Safety-equipment index: Cullinan 99 vs ORA 5 88.

Practicality index: Cullinan 75 vs ORA 5 54.

Ownership-cover index: Cullinan not separately scored vs ORA 5 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Cullinan leads by 8 points

Cullinan has a modest catalogue-index lead, while ORA 5 remains close.

Evidence leader 79 /100
Lead 8 points
Data 83% source coverage
79
#1 Evidence leader

Cullinan

83% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Performance 99 Check Efficiency 28
Performance 99
Efficiency 28
Safety 99
Practicality 75
Leads by 8 points
71
#2

ORA 5

62% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 90 Check Practicality 54
Performance 56
Efficiency 90
Safety 88
Practicality 54
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Cullinan +43 Efficiency ORA 5 +62 Safety Cullinan +11 Practicality Cullinan +21

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Cullinan

Performance 99/100
Efficiency 28/100
Safety 99/100
Practicality 75/100

ORA 5

Performance 56/100
Efficiency 90/100
Safety 88/100
Practicality 54/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Rolls-Royce Cullinan leads the specification evidence index with 79 pts vs 71 pts for ORA 5

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Cullinan leads. However, ORA 5 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

Cullinan
Cullinan
VS
Grand Vitara
Grand Vitara
Cullinan vs Grand Vitara →
Cullinan
Cullinan
VS
Elevate
Elevate
Cullinan vs Elevate →
Cullinan
Cullinan
VS
Coolray
Coolray
Cullinan vs Coolray →
Cullinan
Cullinan
VS
C5-X
C5-X
Cullinan vs C5-X →
Cullinan
Cullinan
VS
Curvv
Curvv
Cullinan vs Curvv →
Cullinan
Cullinan
VS
Across
Across
Cullinan vs Across →
ORA 5
ORA 5
VS
Grand Vitara
Grand Vitara
ORA 5 vs Grand Vitara →
ORA 5
ORA 5
VS
Elevate
Elevate
ORA 5 vs Elevate →

Cullinan vs ORA 5 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.