Rolls-Royce Cullinan vs Lexus NX

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Rolls-Royce Cullinan in South Africa

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Cullinan Series II Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
Price on request
⚡ 420 kW 🔧 850 Nm ⛽ 5.95 km/l
VS
Lexus NX in South Africa

Lexus NX

NX 350 F SPORT Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 1,276,500 ex-showroom
⚡ 205 kW 🔧 430 Nm ⛽ 12.3 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Rolls-Royce Cullinan vs Lexus NX: the short answer

Cullinan and NX are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Cullinan NX
Maximum Power Cullinan420 kW @ 5000-6000 rpm NX205 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque Cullinan850 Nm @ 1600-4250 rpm NX430 Nm
Engine Size Cullinan6749 cc NX2400 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Cullinan5.95 km/l NX12.3 km/l
Ground Clearance Cullinan173 mm NX195 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

Cullinan

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

NX

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Cullinan

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

NX

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Cullinan NX
Model Introduced Year 2018 2023
Generation Cullinan Series II, the current evolution of the marque's five-door super-luxury SUV Second-generation Lexus NX mid-size luxury SUV
Facelift History Cullinan was introduced in South Africa in 2018 and received its most extensive evolution as Cullinan Series II in May 2024 Current South African range includes petrol, self-charging hybrid and plug-in-hybrid derivatives
Facelift Launched Since 2024 Current South African range includes petrol, self-charging hybrid and plug-in-hybrid derivatives
Facelift Version Ending Current Current South African specification checked 2026-07-17
Body Style Five-door luxury SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active published
Segment Full-size super-luxury SUV Luxury SUV
Vehicle Type Internal-combustion sport utility vehicle SUV
Tare Mass Kg - 1760-1860 kg
Spec Cullinan NX
Length 5355 mm 4660 mm
Width 2000 mm 1865 mm
Height 1835 mm 1670 mm
Wheelbase 3295 mm 2690 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 173 mm 195 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 173 mm -
Fuel Tank Capacity 90 l 55 l
Boot/Cargo Space 612 l 520 l
Kerb Weight 2725 kg -
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 3300 kg 2370 kg
Payload Capacity 575 kg -
Towing Capacity 2700 kg 1000 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows -
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 6.6 m 5.8 m
Front Headroom 1064 mm -
Rear Headroom 1026 mm -
Front Legroom 1006 mm -
Rear Legroom 1090 mm -

In depth: how these cars differ

This Cullinan and NX comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Cullinan 99 vs NX 86.

Efficiency index: Cullinan 28 vs NX 49.

Safety-equipment index: Cullinan 99 vs NX 93.

Practicality index: Cullinan 75 vs NX 65.

Ownership-cover index: Cullinan not separately scored vs NX not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Cullinan leads by 4 points

Cullinan and NX are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 79 /100
Lead 4 points
Data 83% source coverage
79
#1 Evidence leader

Cullinan

83% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Performance 99 Check Efficiency 28
Performance 99
Efficiency 28
Safety 99
Practicality 75
Leads by 4 points
75
#2

NX

70% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 93 Check Efficiency 49
Performance 86
Efficiency 49
Safety 93
Practicality 65
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Cullinan +13 Efficiency NX +21 Safety Cullinan +6 Practicality Cullinan +10

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Cullinan

Performance 99/100
Efficiency 28/100
Safety 99/100
Practicality 75/100

NX

Performance 86/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 93/100
Practicality 65/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Rolls-Royce Cullinan leads the specification evidence index with 79 pts vs 75 pts for NX

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Cullinan leads. However, NX may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

Cullinan
Cullinan
VS
X3
X3
Cullinan vs X3 →
Cullinan
Cullinan
VS
ATTO 8
ATTO 8
Cullinan vs ATTO 8 →
Cullinan
Cullinan
VS
GLC
GLC
Cullinan vs GLC →
Cullinan
Cullinan
VS
SEALION 7
SEALION 7
Cullinan vs SEALION 7 →
Cullinan
Cullinan
VS
Sorento
Sorento
Cullinan vs Sorento →
Cullinan
Cullinan
VS
C9 SHS
C9 SHS
Cullinan vs C9 SHS →
NX
NX
VS
X3
X3
NX vs X3 →
NX
NX
VS
ATTO 8
ATTO 8
NX vs ATTO 8 →

Cullinan vs NX questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.