Rolls-Royce Cullinan vs Mercedes-Benz GLA

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Rolls-Royce Cullinan in South Africa

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Cullinan Series II Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
Price on request
⚡ 420 kW 🔧 850 Nm ⛽ 5.95 km/l
VS
Mercedes-Benz GLA in South Africa

Mercedes-Benz GLA

GLA 200 Petrol Current
ZAR 901,887 ex-showroom
⚡ 120 kW 🔧 270 Nm
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Rolls-Royce Cullinan vs Mercedes-Benz GLA: the short answer

Compare the available model information below. Hagalu has withheld a ranked verdict because the selected vehicles do not yet meet the minimum like-for-like source-coverage threshold.

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Cullinan GLA
Maximum Power Cullinan420 kW @ 5000-6000 rpm GLA120 kW
Maximum Torque Cullinan850 Nm @ 1600-4250 rpm GLA270 Nm
Engine Size Cullinan6749 cc GLA1332 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Cullinan5.95 km/l GLA-
Ground Clearance Cullinan173 mm GLA-

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Cullinan GLA
Model Introduced Year 2018 2026
Generation Cullinan Series II, the current evolution of the marque's five-door super-luxury SUV -
Facelift History Cullinan was introduced in South Africa in 2018 and received its most extensive evolution as Cullinan Series II in May 2024 -
Facelift Launched Since 2024 -
Facelift Version Ending Current -
Body Style Five-door luxury SUV Suv
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active Current South African retail range
Segment Full-size super-luxury SUV -
Vehicle Type Internal-combustion sport utility vehicle -
Spec Cullinan GLA
Length 5355 mm -
Width 2000 mm -
Height 1835 mm -
Wheelbase 3295 mm -
Ground Clearance (Default) 173 mm -
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 173 mm -
Fuel Tank Capacity 90 l -
Boot/Cargo Space 612 l -
Kerb Weight 2725 kg -
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 3300 kg -
Payload Capacity 575 kg -
Towing Capacity 2700 kg -
Seating Capacity 5 seats -
Number of Rows 2 rows -
Doors 5 doors -
Minimum Turning Radius 6.6 m -
Front Headroom 1064 mm -
Rear Headroom 1026 mm -
Front Legroom 1006 mm -
Rear Legroom 1090 mm -

In depth: how these cars differ

This Cullinan and GLA comparison brings together local model information and available derivatives for South Africa. Prices and specifications appear only where they have been recorded for this market.

Hagalu has withheld an overall score because at least one selected vehicle does not yet have four comparable categories and 50% weighted source coverage. Missing catalogue evidence is not replaced with a neutral score or a guessed value.

Use the key-spec and full-spec tables to compare the fields that are confirmed. For a purchase decision, verify current availability, exact derivative equipment, finance, insurance and ownership cover with the relevant manufacturer or authorised retailer.

Specification Score Withheld

Hagalu does not turn missing specifications into neutral scores or guessed values.

Fail closed

Score withheld: fewer than four comparable categories or less than 50% weighted source coverage for at least one vehicle.

Use the verified key-spec and full-spec tables on this page. A ranked index will appear only after every selected vehicle has source-backed data in at least four categories and reaches 50% weighted coverage.

What the evidence means

No overall winner is declared because the selected vehicles do not yet meet Hagalu's minimum like-for-like source-coverage threshold. Compare the confirmed rows and verify the exact derivative before buying.

Cullinan vs GLA questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.