Changan CS75 Pro vs Chery Tiggo V

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Changan CS75 Pro in South Africa

Changan CS75 Pro

1.5T AT 5S CE Petrol 7-Speed DCT Current
ZAR 474,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 138 kW 🔧 300 Nm ⛽ 13.33 km/l
VS
Chery Tiggo V in South Africa

Chery Tiggo V

Promotional Preview Hybrid Upcoming
Launch price pending
Upcoming in South Africa Confirmed launch information and specifications remain visible while final availability is pending.
Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Changan CS75 Pro vs Chery Tiggo V: the short answer

The verified specification tables are ready to compare, but Hagalu has withheld a ranked verdict because the selected vehicles do not yet meet the minimum like-for-like source-coverage threshold.

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CS75 Pro Tiggo V
Maximum Power CS75 Pro138 kW Tiggo V-
Maximum Torque CS75 Pro300 Nm Tiggo V-
Engine Size CS75 Pro1494 cc Tiggo V-
Combined Fuel Economy CS75 Pro13.33 km/l Tiggo V-
Ground Clearance CS75 ProNot Officially Disclosed Tiggo V220 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CS75 Pro Tiggo V
Model Introduced Year 2025 -
Generation Current South African CS75 Pro generation with two equipment grades and two seating configurations. Upcoming first South African-market Chery Tiggo V family and leisure SUV; final retail derivative matrix pending
Facelift History No South African facelift has been announced since the present CS75 Pro range entered local sale. -
Facelift Launched Since Not Applicable -
Facelift Version Ending Not Applicable -
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active upcoming
Segment Mid-size SUV Three-row family SUV
Vehicle Type Passenger car Passenger Car
Spec CS75 Pro Tiggo V
Length 4730 mm -
Width 1870 mm -
Height 1720 mm -
Wheelbase 2786 mm -
Ground Clearance (Default) Not Officially Disclosed 220 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed -
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 l -
Boot/Cargo Space 620 l -
Kerb Weight 1550 kg -
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1925 kg -
Payload Capacity Not Officially Disclosed -
Towing Capacity Not Officially Disclosed -
Seating Capacity 5 seats -
Number of Rows 2 rows 3 rows
Doors 5 doors -
Minimum Turning Radius Not Officially Disclosed -
Front Headroom Not Officially Disclosed -
Rear Headroom Not Officially Disclosed -
Front Legroom Not Officially Disclosed -
Rear Legroom Not Officially Disclosed -

In depth: how these cars differ

This CS75 Pro and Tiggo V comparison keeps the exact South African derivatives, lifecycle states, available prices and verified specifications side by side.

Hagalu has withheld an overall score because at least one selected vehicle does not yet have four comparable categories and 50% weighted source coverage. Missing catalogue evidence is not replaced with a neutral score or a guessed value.

Use the key-spec and full-spec tables to compare the fields that are confirmed. For a purchase decision, verify current availability, exact derivative equipment, finance, insurance and ownership cover with the relevant manufacturer or authorised retailer.

Specification Index Withheld

Hagalu does not turn missing specifications into neutral scores or guessed values.

Fail closed

Score withheld: fewer than four comparable categories or less than 50% weighted source coverage for at least one vehicle.

Use the verified key-spec and full-spec tables on this page. A ranked index will appear only after every selected vehicle has source-backed data in at least four categories and reaches 50% weighted coverage.

What the evidence means

No overall winner is declared because the selected vehicles do not yet meet Hagalu's minimum like-for-like source-coverage threshold. Compare the confirmed rows and verify the exact derivative before buying.

CS75 Pro vs Tiggo V questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.