Hyundai Creta vs Suzuki Fronx

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Hyundai Creta Discontinued model
Hyundai Creta in South Africa

Hyundai Creta

1.5 IVT Fluid Petrol Discontinued model
ZAR 456,900 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 85 kW 🔧 144 Nm ⛽ 16.8 km/l
VS
Suzuki Fronx in South Africa

Suzuki Fronx

1.5 GLX AT Petrol 4-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 372,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 77 kW 🔧 138 Nm ⛽ 16.1 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Hyundai Creta vs Suzuki Fronx: the short answer

Creta and Fronx are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Recorded price context Creta: last listed from ZAR 407,900 · Fronx: current from ZAR 303,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Creta Fronx
Maximum Power Creta85 kW @ 6300 rpm Fronx77 kW
Maximum Torque Creta144 Nm @ 4500 rpm Fronx138 Nm
Engine Size Creta1497 cc Fronx1462 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Creta16.8 km/l Fronx16.1 km/l
Ground Clearance Creta200 mm Fronx0 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Hyundai Creta

1.5 IVT Fluid

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Suzuki Fronx

1.5 GLX AT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

Creta

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Fronx

Strengths
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use

Which One's Right for You?

Creta

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Fronx

  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec Creta Fronx
Model Introduced Year 2016 2026
Generation Second generation Creta built on Hyundai's i-GMP platform; the SA model is a popular variant shared with several emerging markets Current market generation
Facelift History Second generation arrived in SA in 2021 with significant upgrades to interior quality, safety tech, and engine options; notably improved over the first-gen car Current market specification
Facelift Launched Since 2021 2026
Body Style SUV SUV
Production Status discontinued active
Segment SUV SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1365 kg -
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Facelift Version Ending Not confirmed Current
Model Year Not confirmed 2026
Spec Creta Fronx
Length 4330 mm 3995 mm
Width 1790 mm 1765 mm
Height 1635 mm 1550 mm
Wheelbase 2610 mm 2520 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 200 mm 0 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed 170 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 l 37 l
Boot/Cargo Space 433 l 308 l
Kerb Weight 1365 kg 1060 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1860 kg 1540 kg
Payload Capacity 495 kg 480 kg
Towing Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 1000 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.3 m 5.2 m
Front Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 1000 mm
Rear Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 950 mm
Front Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 1050 mm
Rear Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 900 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Creta and Fronx comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Creta 36 vs Fronx 34.

Efficiency index: Creta 65 vs Fronx 62.

Safety-equipment index: Creta 84 vs Fronx 87.

Practicality index: Creta 66 vs Fronx 48.

Ownership-cover index: Creta 65 vs Fronx not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Creta leads by 5 points

Creta and Fronx are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 62 /100
Lead 5 points
Data 93% source coverage
62
#1 Evidence leader

Creta

93% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 84 Check Performance 36
Performance 36
Efficiency 65
Safety 84
Practicality 66
Ownership 65
Leads by 5 points
57
#2

Fronx

74% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 87 Check Performance 34
Performance 34
Efficiency 62
Safety 87
Practicality 48
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Creta +2 Efficiency Creta +3 Safety Fronx +3 Practicality Creta +18

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Creta

Performance 36/100
Efficiency 65/100
Safety 84/100
Practicality 66/100
Ownership 65/100

Fronx

Performance 34/100
Efficiency 62/100
Safety 87/100
Practicality 48/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Hyundai Creta leads the specification evidence index with 62 pts vs 57 pts for Fronx

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Creta leads. However, Fronx may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Creta vs Fronx questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.