Honda CR-V vs Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Honda CR-V in South Africa

Honda CR-V

2.0 Hybrid e:HEV Hybrid e-CVT Current
ZAR 819,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 204 kW 🔧 335 Nm ⛽ 20 km/l
VS
Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab in South Africa

Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab

2.4L Bi-Turbo A/T Diesel 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 959,990 ex-showroom
⚡ 150 kW 🔧 470 Nm ⛽ 11.9 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Honda CR-V vs Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab: the short answer

CR-V and Triton Double Cab are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Triton Double Cab starts ZAR 49,910 cheaper CR-V from ZAR 689,900 · Triton Double Cab from ZAR 639,990

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CR-V Triton Double Cab
Maximum Power CR-V204 kW Triton Double Cab150 kW @ 3500 rpm
Maximum Torque CR-V335 Nm Triton Double Cab470 Nm @ 1500-2750 rpm
Engine Size CR-V1993 cc Triton Double Cab2442 cc
Combined Fuel Economy CR-V20 km/l Triton Double Cab11.9 km/l
Ground Clearance CR-V198 mm Triton Double Cab228 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Honda CR-V

2.0 Hybrid e:HEV

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab

2.4L Bi-Turbo A/T

Hagalu editorial rating
4.3/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Hagalu Editorial Team ·

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

CR-V

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

Triton Double Cab

Strengths
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

CR-V

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Triton Double Cab

  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CR-V Triton Double Cab
Wheelbase 2700 mm 3130 mm
Length 4690 mm 5360 mm
Width 1860 mm 1930 mm
Height 1690 mm 1815 mm
Kerb Weight 1750 kg 2035 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2250 kg 3020 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Boot/Cargo Space 497 l 1262 l
Towing Capacity 1500 kg 3500 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity 57 l 75 l
Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 198 mm 195 mm
Payload Capacity 500 kg 985 kg
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Minimum Turning Radius 5.7 m 6.35 m
Front Headroom 970 mm 1000 mm
Rear Headroom 970 mm 972 mm
Front Legroom 1049 mm 1059 mm
Rear Legroom 1041 mm 857 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 198 mm 228 mm
Spec CR-V Triton Double Cab
Gearbox eCVT Automatic 6-Speed Automatic
Drivetrain Layout All Wheel Drive Front-engine, selectable four-wheel drive
LSD Available Electronic AWD Control Active Limited Slip Differential (brake control)
Transfer Case Not Applicable Super Select 4WD-II
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Gearbox Type eCVT Automatic 6-Speed Automatic
Gear Shift Type eCVT Automatic Floor-mounted selector
Drivetrain AWD 4WD
Axle Layout AWD 4x4
Differential Lock Electronic AWD Lock Rear differential lock
4WD Engagement Available Selectable electronically
4WD Hi Range Available Yes
Low Range Ratio Not Applicable 2.566
Number of Gears Not Applicable 6
Transmission Speeds Not Applicable 6
4WD Lo Range Not Applicable Yes
4WD Selector Not Applicable Rotary selector
Low Range Not Applicable Yes
Front Differential Lock Not Applicable No
Rear Differential Lock Not Applicable Yes
Paddle Shifters Not Applicable No
Automatic Shift Paddles Not Applicable No
Final Drive Ratio Not Applicable 4.272
Clutch Type Not Applicable Torque converter
Gear Shift Indicator Not Applicable Yes

In depth: how these cars differ

This CR-V and Triton Double Cab comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CR-V 77 vs Triton Double Cab 75.

Efficiency index: CR-V 80 vs Triton Double Cab 47.

Safety-equipment index: CR-V 91 vs Triton Double Cab 95.

Practicality index: CR-V 66 vs Triton Double Cab 90.

Ownership-cover index: CR-V 60 vs Triton Double Cab not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Triton Double Cab leads by 2 points

CR-V and Triton Double Cab are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 78 /100
Lead 2 points
Data 83% source coverage
78
#1 Evidence leader

Triton Double Cab

83% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 95 Check Efficiency 47
Performance 75
Efficiency 47
Safety 95
Practicality 90
Leads by 2 points
76
#2

CR-V

94% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Ownership 60
Performance 77
Efficiency 80
Safety 91
Practicality 66
Ownership 60
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance CR-V +2 Efficiency CR-V +33 Safety Triton Double Cab +4 Practicality Triton Double Cab +24

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Triton Double Cab

Performance 75/100
Efficiency 47/100
Safety 95/100
Practicality 90/100

CR-V

Performance 77/100
Efficiency 80/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 66/100
Ownership 60/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab leads the specification evidence index with 78 pts vs 76 pts for CR-V

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Triton Double Cab leads. However, CR-V may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

CR-V
CR-V
VS
Sportage
Sportage
CR-V vs Sportage →
CR-V
CR-V
VS
Tiguan
Tiguan
CR-V vs Tiguan →
CR-V
CR-V
VS
D-Max X-Rider
D-Max X-Rider
CR-V vs D-Max X-Rider →
CR-V
CR-V
VS
Karoo Special Edition Dusk
Karoo Special Edition Dusk
CR-V vs Karoo Special Edition Dusk →
CR-V
CR-V
VS
Karoo Special Edition Dew
Karoo Special Edition Dew
CR-V vs Karoo Special Edition Dew →
CR-V
CR-V
VS
Karoo Special Edition Dawn
Karoo Special Edition Dawn
CR-V vs Karoo Special Edition Dawn →
Triton Double Cab
Triton Double Cab
VS
Sportage
Sportage
Triton Double Cab vs Sportage →
Triton Double Cab
Triton Double Cab
VS
Tiguan
Tiguan
Triton Double Cab vs Tiguan →

CR-V vs Triton Double Cab questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.