Honda CR-V vs MG MG3

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Honda CR-V in South Africa

Honda CR-V

2.0 Hybrid e:HEV Hybrid e-CVT Current
ZAR 819,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 204 kW 🔧 335 Nm ⛽ 20 km/l
VS
MG MG3 in South Africa

MG MG3

1.5L Hybrid+ Hybrid 3-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 469,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 75 kW 🔧 128 Nm ⛽ 23.26 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Honda CR-V vs MG MG3: the short answer

CR-V has a modest catalogue-index lead, while MG3 remains close.

MG3 starts ZAR 420,000 cheaper CR-V from ZAR 689,900 · MG3 from ZAR 269,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CR-V MG3
Maximum Power CR-V204 kW MG375 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque CR-V335 Nm MG3128 Nm @ 4500 rpm
Engine Size CR-V1993 cc MG31498 cc
Combined Fuel Economy CR-V20 km/l MG323.26 km/l
Ground Clearance CR-V198 mm MG3149 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Honda CR-V

2.0 Hybrid e:HEV

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

MG MG3

1.5L Hybrid+

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

CR-V

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

MG3

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

CR-V

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

MG3

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CR-V MG3
Wheelbase 2700 mm 2570 mm
Length 4690 mm 4113 mm
Width 1860 mm 1797 mm
Height 1690 mm 1502 mm
Kerb Weight 1750 kg 1308 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2250 kg 1766 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Boot/Cargo Space 497 l 293 l
Towing Capacity 1500 kg 500 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity 57 l 36 l
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 198 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Payload Capacity 500 kg 458 kg
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Minimum Turning Radius 5.7 m 5.25 m
Front Headroom 970 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Headroom 970 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Front Legroom 1049 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Legroom 1041 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Ground Clearance (Default) 198 mm 149 mm
Spec CR-V MG3
Gearbox eCVT Automatic 3-Speed Automatic hybrid transmission
Drivetrain Layout All Wheel Drive Front-wheel drive
LSD Available Electronic AWD Control Not Available
Transfer Case Not Applicable Not Applicable
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Gearbox Type eCVT Automatic Hybrid transmission
Gear Shift Type eCVT Automatic Hybrid
Drivetrain AWD Front-wheel drive
Axle Layout AWD Front-wheel drive
Differential Lock Electronic AWD Lock Not Applicable
4WD Engagement Available Not Applicable
4WD Hi Range Available Not Applicable
Low Range Ratio Not Applicable Not Applicable
Number of Gears Not Applicable 3
Transmission Speeds Not Applicable 3
4WD Lo Range Not Applicable Not Applicable
4WD Selector Not Applicable Not Applicable
Low Range Not Applicable Not Applicable
Front Differential Lock Not Applicable Not Applicable
Rear Differential Lock Not Applicable Not Applicable
Paddle Shifters Not Applicable Not Available
Automatic Shift Paddles Not Applicable Not Available
Final Drive Ratio Not Applicable Not Officially Disclosed
Clutch Type Not Applicable Not Applicable
Gear Shift Indicator Not Applicable Not Applicable

In depth: how these cars differ

This CR-V and MG3 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CR-V 77 vs MG3 40.

Efficiency index: CR-V 80 vs MG3 90.

Safety-equipment index: CR-V 91 vs MG3 92.

Practicality index: CR-V 66 vs MG3 48.

Ownership-cover index: CR-V 60 vs MG3 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

CR-V leads by 10 points

CR-V has a modest catalogue-index lead, while MG3 remains close.

Evidence leader 76 /100
Lead 10 points
Data 94% source coverage
76
#1 Evidence leader

CR-V

94% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Ownership 60
Performance 77
Efficiency 80
Safety 91
Practicality 66
Ownership 60
Leads by 10 points
66
#2

MG3

82% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 92 Check Performance 40
Performance 40
Efficiency 90
Safety 92
Practicality 48
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance CR-V +37 Efficiency MG3 +10 Safety MG3 +1 Practicality CR-V +18

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

CR-V

Performance 77/100
Efficiency 80/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 66/100
Ownership 60/100

MG3

Performance 40/100
Efficiency 90/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 48/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Honda CR-V leads the specification evidence index with 76 pts vs 66 pts for MG3

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, CR-V leads. However, MG3 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

CR-V vs MG3 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.