Toyota Coaster vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Toyota Coaster in South Africa

Toyota Coaster

2.8D GL 6AT Diesel 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 1,207,600 ex-showroom
⚡ 110 kW 🔧 420 Nm ⛽ 7.5 km/l
VS
Ford Ranger Wildtrak in South Africa

Ford Ranger Wildtrak

3.0TD V6 Double Cab Wildtrak 10AT 4x4 Diesel 10-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 1,070,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 184 kW 🔧 600 Nm ⛽ 11.9 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Toyota Coaster vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak: the short answer

Ranger Wildtrak holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Coaster.

Ranger Wildtrak starts ZAR 342,600 cheaper Coaster from ZAR 1,207,600 · Ranger Wildtrak from ZAR 865,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Coaster Ranger Wildtrak
Maximum Power Coaster110 kW Ranger Wildtrak184 kW @ 5900 rpm
Maximum Torque Coaster420 Nm Ranger Wildtrak600 Nm
Engine Size Coaster2755 cc Ranger Wildtrak2993 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Coaster7.5 km/l Ranger Wildtrak11.9 km/l
Ground Clearance Coaster180 mm Ranger Wildtrak237 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Toyota Coaster

2.8D GL 6AT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Ford Ranger Wildtrak

3.0TD V6 Double Cab Wildtrak 10AT 4x4

Hagalu editorial rating
4.2/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Hagalu Editorial Team ·

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Coaster

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
  • Lower published ownership cover
Best suited to: General Use
Specification evidence leader

Ranger Wildtrak

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
  • Stronger published ownership cover
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Coaster

  • Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix

Ranger Wildtrak

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published warranty or service cover

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Coaster Ranger Wildtrak
Model Introduced Year Current local generation year not confirmed 2022
Generation Current South African Coaster listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data. Current-generation Ford Ranger
Facelift History Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle. Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle.
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Midibus Pickup
Color Note Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering. Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering.
Dealer Stock Note Top grade in the South Africa lineup Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Bus Pickup
Tare Mass Kg 3670 kg 2386 kg
Vehicle Type Bus Pickup
Body Type Cab - Single/extended/double cab as per derivative name
Drivetrain Note - Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 3.0TD V6 Double Cab Wildtrak 10AT 4x4
Spec Coaster Ranger Wildtrak
Length 6990 mm 5350 mm
Width 2080 mm 1918 mm
Height 2635 mm 1886 mm
Wheelbase 3935 mm 3270 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 180 mm 237 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 125 mm 185 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 95 l 80 l
Boot/Cargo Space 472 l 487 l
Kerb Weight 3670 kg 2386 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 5325 kg 3350 kg
Payload Capacity 1655 kg 964 kg
Towing Capacity 1400 kg 3500 kg
Seating Capacity 23 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 3 rows 2 rows
Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 6.5 m 12.9 m
Front Headroom 981 mm 1024 mm
Rear Headroom 953 mm 989 mm
Front Legroom 1045 mm 1057 mm
Rear Legroom 896 mm 879 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Coaster and Ranger Wildtrak comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Coaster 64 vs Ranger Wildtrak 89.

Efficiency index: Coaster 38 vs Ranger Wildtrak 52.

Safety-equipment index: Coaster 88 vs Ranger Wildtrak 93.

Practicality index: Coaster 76 vs Ranger Wildtrak 84.

Ownership-cover index: Coaster 43 vs Ranger Wildtrak 76.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Ranger Wildtrak leads by 17 points

Ranger Wildtrak holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Coaster.

Evidence leader 81 /100
Lead 17 points
Data 77% source coverage
81
#1 Evidence leader

Ranger Wildtrak

77% source coverage 4 strong categories
Best at Safety 93 Check Efficiency 52
Performance 89
Efficiency 52
Safety 93
Practicality 84
Ownership 76
Leads by 17 points
64
#2

Coaster

71% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 88 Check Efficiency 38
Performance 64
Efficiency 38
Safety 88
Practicality 76
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Ranger Wildtrak +25 Efficiency Ranger Wildtrak +14 Safety Ranger Wildtrak +5 Practicality Ranger Wildtrak +8 Ownership Ranger Wildtrak +33

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Ranger Wildtrak

Performance 89/100
Efficiency 52/100
Safety 93/100
Practicality 84/100
Ownership 76/100

Coaster

Performance 64/100
Efficiency 38/100
Safety 88/100
Practicality 76/100
Ownership 43/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Ford Ranger Wildtrak leads the specification evidence index with 81 pts vs 64 pts for Coaster

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Ranger Wildtrak leads. However, Coaster may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

Coaster
Coaster
VS
Ranger Tremor
Ranger Tremor
Coaster vs Ranger Tremor →
Coaster
Coaster
VS
SHARK 6 DMO
SHARK 6 DMO
Coaster vs SHARK 6 DMO →
Coaster
Coaster
VS
Ranger Platinum
Ranger Platinum
Coaster vs Ranger Platinum →
Coaster
Coaster
VS
D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35
D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35
Coaster vs D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 →
Coaster
Coaster
VS
Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab
Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab
Coaster vs Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab →
Coaster
Coaster
VS
P500
P500
Coaster vs P500 →
Ranger Wildtrak
Ranger Wildtrak
VS
Ranger Tremor
Ranger Tremor
Ranger Wildtrak vs Ranger Tremor →
Ranger Wildtrak
Ranger Wildtrak
VS
SHARK 6 DMO
SHARK 6 DMO
Ranger Wildtrak vs SHARK 6 DMO →

Coaster vs Ranger Wildtrak questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.