Toyota Coaster vs MG Cyberster

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Toyota Coaster in South Africa

Toyota Coaster

2.8D GL 6AT Diesel 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 1,207,600 ex-showroom
⚡ 110 kW 🔧 420 Nm ⛽ 7.5 km/l
VS
MG Cyberster in South Africa

MG Cyberster

Dual Motor 4WD Roadster Electric Single-Speed Reduction Gear Current
ZAR 1,399,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 375 kW 🔧 725 Nm
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Toyota Coaster vs MG Cyberster: the short answer

Cyberster has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Coaster remains close.

Coaster starts ZAR 192,300 cheaper Coaster from ZAR 1,207,600 · Cyberster from ZAR 1,399,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Coaster Cyberster
Maximum Power Coaster110 kW Cyberster375 kW
Maximum Torque Coaster420 Nm Cyberster725 Nm
Engine Size Coaster2755 cc CybersterNot Applicable
Combined Fuel Economy Coaster7.5 km/l CybersterNot Applicable
Ground Clearance Coaster180 mm Cyberster116 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Toyota Coaster

2.8D GL 6AT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

MG Cyberster

Dual Motor 4WD Roadster

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Coaster

Strengths
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader

Cyberster

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Coaster

  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Cyberster

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Coaster Cyberster
Model Introduced Year Current local generation year not confirmed 2025
Generation Current South African Coaster listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data. First-generation battery-electric Cyberster roadster in local dual-motor all-wheel-drive form.
Facelift History Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle. South African launch specification introduced as MG's electric halo in 2025.
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version 2025
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Midibus Two-door, two-seat soft-top roadster
Color Note Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering. -
Dealer Stock Note Top grade in the South Africa lineup -
Model Year 2026 2025
Production Status active active
Segment Bus Electric Sports Roadster
Tare Mass Kg 3670 kg -
Vehicle Type Bus Convertible
Spec Coaster Cyberster
Length 6990 mm 4535 mm
Width 2080 mm 1913 mm
Height 2635 mm 1329 mm
Wheelbase 3935 mm 2690 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 180 mm 116 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 125 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Fuel Tank Capacity 95 l 0 l
Boot/Cargo Space 472 l 249 l
Kerb Weight 3670 kg 1985 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 5325 kg 2210 kg
Payload Capacity 1655 kg 225 kg
Towing Capacity 1400 kg 0 kg
Seating Capacity 23 seats 2 seats
Number of Rows 3 rows 1 rows
Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 6.5 m 5.45 m
Front Headroom 981 mm 1043 mm
Rear Headroom 953 mm Not Applicable
Front Legroom 1045 mm 1070 mm
Rear Legroom 896 mm Not Applicable

In depth: how these cars differ

This Coaster and Cyberster comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Coaster 64 vs Cyberster 100.

Efficiency index: Coaster 38 vs Cyberster 90.

Safety-equipment index: Coaster 88 vs Cyberster 77.

Practicality index: Coaster 76 vs Cyberster 34.

Ownership-cover index: Coaster 43 vs Cyberster not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Cyberster leads by 11 points

Cyberster has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Coaster remains close.

Evidence leader 75 /100
Lead 11 points
Data 63% source coverage
75
#1 Evidence leader

Cyberster

63% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Performance 100 Check Practicality 34
Performance 100
Efficiency 90
Safety 77
Practicality 34
Leads by 11 points
64
#2

Coaster

71% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 88 Check Efficiency 38
Performance 64
Efficiency 38
Safety 88
Practicality 76
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Cyberster +36 Efficiency Cyberster +52 Safety Coaster +11 Practicality Coaster +42

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Cyberster

Performance 100/100
Efficiency 90/100
Safety 77/100
Practicality 34/100

Coaster

Performance 64/100
Efficiency 38/100
Safety 88/100
Practicality 76/100
Ownership 43/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index MG Cyberster leads the specification evidence index with 75 pts vs 64 pts for Coaster

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Cyberster leads. However, Coaster may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Coaster vs Cyberster questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.