Chery Chery Q vs GWM Tank 300

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Chery Chery Q in South Africa

Chery Chery Q

Upcoming
Launch price pending
Upcoming in South Africa Confirmed launch information and specifications remain visible while final availability is pending.
VS
GWM Tank 300 in South Africa

GWM Tank 300

2.0T Hi4-T Hybrid Plug-in Hybrid 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 849,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 240 kW 🔧 750 Nm ⛽ 35.7 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Tank 300
Fuel Economy Tank 300
🛡 Safety Tank 300
📦 Practicality Tank 300
🔑 Ownership Tank 300

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec Chery Q Tank 300
Maximum Power - 240 kW @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque - 750 Nm
Engine Size - 1999 cc
Claimed Mileage - 35.7 km/l
Ground Clearance - 224 mm
Boot / Load Bay - 490 l
Airbags - 8
Kerb Weight - 2050 kg
Seating Capacity - -
Warranty - 5 Years / 100,000 km

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

Tank 300 dominates this comparison with clear advantages across multiple categories.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Tank 300 +48 pts
Efficiency Tank 300 +47 pts
Safety Tank 300 +100 pts
Practicality Tank 300 +26 pts
Ownership Tank 300 +15 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Chery Q

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: General Use
🏆 Overall Winner

Tank 300

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Which One's Right for You?

Chery Q

  • Buyers looking for a balanced all-round vehicle

Tank 300

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Chery Q Tank 300
Hybrid System - Plug-in Hybrid
Combined Power - 255 kW
Combined Torque - 615 Nm
Motor Type - Not Officially Disclosed
Number of Motors - Not Officially Disclosed
Motor Location - Not Officially Disclosed
Quarter Mile - Not Officially Disclosed
Rev Limiter - Not Officially Disclosed
Power-to-Weight Ratio - 124.4 kW/tonne
Torque-to-Weight Ratio - 300 Nm/tonne
Usable Battery Capacity - Not Officially Disclosed
Battery Voltage - Not Officially Disclosed
Electric Range - 105 km
AC Charging Time - Not Officially Disclosed
DC Charging Time - Not Officially Disclosed
Aspiration - Turbocharged
Bore - 82.5 mm
Compression Ratio - 10.5:1
Cylinders - 4
Drive Type - AWD
Engine Code - GW4C20D
Engine Displacement - 1999 cc
Fuel System - Direct Injection
Launch Control - Yes
Maximum Torque - 750 Nm
Regenerative Braking - Yes
Stroke - 93.1 mm
Top Speed - 195 km/h
Valves - 16
Valves per Cylinder - 4
AC Charging Power - Not Officially Disclosed
0-100 km/h - 5.8 sec
Battery Capacity - 19.1 kWh
Battery Type - Lithium-ion
Cylinder Layout - Inline
DC Charging Power - Not Officially Disclosed
Drive Modes - Not Officially Disclosed
Engine - 2-litre Turbocharged Petrol Plug-in Hybrid
Fuel Type - Plug-in Hybrid
Maximum Power - 240 kW @ 5500 rpm
Transmission - 8-Speed Automatic
Spec Chery Q Tank 300
360 Degree Camera - Yes
Adaptive Cruise Control - Yes
Adaptive Cruise Control - Yes
Around View Monitor - Yes
Attention Assist - Yes
Autonomous Emergency Braking - Yes
Automatic High Beam - Yes
Auto Highbeam - Yes
Auto Lights - Yes
Auto Park Assist - No
Auto Wipers - Yes
Blind Spot Monitoring - Yes
Blind Spot Warning - Yes
Cruise Control - Yes
Driver Fatigue Alert - Yes
Eco Mode - Yes
Emergency Braking - Yes
EV Mode - Yes
Forward Collision Warning - Yes
Front Camera - Yes
Lane Departure Warning - Yes
Lane Keep Assist - Yes
Park Assist - Yes
Parking Distance Sensors - Front and Rear
Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
Rain Sensor Wipers - Yes
Rear View Camera - Yes
Rear Cross Traffic Alert - Yes
Rear Parking Sensors - Yes
Rear View Camera - Yes
Reverse Camera - Yes
Reverse Camera Type - Yes
Sport Mode - Yes
Surround View Camera - Yes
Traffic Sign Recognition - Yes
Parking Sensor - Front and Rear
Pre-Collision System - Yes
Reversing Camera - Yes

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

Tank 300 leads by 49 points

Tank 300 dominates this comparison with clear advantages across multiple categories.

Winner 88 /100
Lead 49 points
Data 97% confidence
88
#1 Winner

Tank 300

97% data confidence 4 strong categories
Best at Safety 100 Check Ownership 65
Performance 98
Efficiency 97
Safety 100
Practicality 76
Ownership 65
Leads by 49 points
39
#2

Chery Q

11% data confidence 0 strong categories
Best at Performance 50 Check Safety 0
Performance 50
Efficiency 50
Safety 0
Practicality 50
Ownership 50
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Tank 300 +48 Efficiency Tank 300 +47 Safety Tank 300 +100 Practicality Tank 300 +26 Ownership Tank 300 +15

High confidence result.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

Tank 300

Performance 98/100
Efficiency 97/100
Safety 100/100
Practicality 76/100
Ownership 65/100

Chery Q

Performance 50/100
Efficiency 50/100
Safety 0/100
Practicality 50/100
Ownership 50/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 GWM Tank 300 wins with 88 pts vs 39 pts for Chery Q

In structured scoring, Tank 300 emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Chery Q may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the Tank 300 edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: Chery Q 50 vs Tank 300 97. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: Chery Q 0, Tank 300 100. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: Chery Q 50, Tank 300 65. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: Chery Q 50, Tank 300 76. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: Chery Q 50, Tank 300 98. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The Tank 300 edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The Tank 300 scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between Chery Q and Tank 300 in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Chery Q scores 50 vs 98.

Efficiency: Chery Q scores 50 vs 97.

Safety: Chery Q scores 0 vs 100.

Practicality: Chery Q scores 50 vs 76.

Ownership: Chery Q scores 50 vs 65.

Final structured scoring gives Tank 300 the advantage in this comparison.