Renault Captur vs Chery Tiggo 4 Cross

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Renault Captur in South Africa

Renault Captur

1.3L Turbo Esprit Alpine EDC Petrol Automatic
ZAR 614,999 ex-showroom
⚡ 113 kW 🔧 270 Nm ⛽ 15.2 km/l
VS
Chery Tiggo 4 Cross in South Africa

Chery Tiggo 4 Cross

LiT MT Petrol Manual
ZAR 279,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 83 kW 🔧 170 Nm ⛽ 14.3 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Captur
Fuel Economy Captur
🛡 Safety Tie
📦 Practicality Tiggo 4 Cross
🔑 Ownership Tiggo 4 Cross
Tiggo 4 Cross starts ZAR 515999 cheaper Captur from ZAR 515,999 · Tiggo 4 Cross from ZAR 279,900

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec Captur Tiggo 4 Cross
Engine Power 113 kW 83 kW
Torque 270 Nm 170 Nm
Engine Size 1.3 cc 1.5 cc
Claimed Mileage 15.2 km/l 14.3 km/l
Ground Clearance 169 mm 180 mm
Boot / Load Bay 484 l -
Airbags Front airbags Multiple airbags
Kerb Weight 1365 kg -
Seating Capacity 5 5
Warranty 5 Year / 150 000 km 5 Years / 150 000 km

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

Both Captur and Tiggo 4 Cross are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Captur +13 pts
Efficiency Captur +3 pts
Safety Equal
Practicality Tiggo 4 Cross +4 pts
Ownership Tiggo 4 Cross +5 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

🏆 Overall Winner

Captur

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency

Tiggo 4 Cross

Strengths
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Family Usage

Which One's Right for You?

Captur

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Tiggo 4 Cross

  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Captur Tiggo 4 Cross
Model Introduced Year 2026 2026
Generation Current South Africa Captur range Current South Africa Tiggo 4 Cross range
Facelift History Current South Africa version listed by official source Current South Africa version listed by official source
Facelift Launched Since 2026 2026
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment SUV SUV
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec Captur Tiggo 4 Cross
Ground Clearance 169 mm 180 mm
Wheelbase 2639 mm 2610 mm
Length 4239 mm 4351 mm
Width 1797 mm 1831 mm
Height 1575 mm 1662 mm
Kerb Weight 1365 kg -
Gross Vehicle Weight 1800 kg 1701 kg
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 484 l -
Towing Capacity 1200 kg -
Front Track Width - -
Rear Track Width - -
Turning Radius 10.42 m -
Load Bed Length 484 l -
Load Bed Width - -
Front Legroom - -
Rear Legroom - -
Front Headroom - -
Rear Headroom - -
Front Shoulder Room - -
Rear Shoulder Room - -
Boot Space Seats Folded - -
Number of Doors 5 5
Max Payload - -
Boot Volume 484 l -
Doors 5 5
Seats 5 5
Fuel Tank Capacity 48 l -
Gross Vehicle Mass Kg 1800 kg 1701 kg
Ground Clearance Max 169 mm 180 mm
Ground Clearance Min 169 mm 180 mm
Ground Clearance Mm 169 mm 180 mm
Height Mm 1575 mm 1662 mm
Length Mm 4239 mm 4351 mm
Loadbox Length Mm 484 l -
Loadbox Width Mm - -
Payload Kg - -
Cargo Volume 484 l -
Tare Mass Kg 1365 kg -
Turning Circle 10.42 m -
Turning Circle M 10.42 m -
Width Mm 1797 mm 1831 mm

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

Captur leads by 2 points

Both Captur and Tiggo 4 Cross are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Winner 59 /100
Lead 2 points
Data 78% confidence
59
#1 Winner

Captur

78% data confidence 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 75 Check Ownership 42
Performance 51
Efficiency 59
Safety 75
Practicality 63
Ownership 42
Leads by 2 points
57
#2

Tiggo 4 Cross

68% data confidence 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 75 Check Performance 38
Performance 38
Efficiency 56
Safety 75
Practicality 67
Ownership 47
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Captur +13 Efficiency Captur +3 Safety Level Practicality Tiggo 4 Cross +4 Ownership Tiggo 4 Cross +5

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

Captur

Performance 51/100
Efficiency 59/100
Safety 75/100
Practicality 63/100
Ownership 42/100

Tiggo 4 Cross

Performance 38/100
Efficiency 56/100
Safety 75/100
Practicality 67/100
Ownership 47/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 Renault Captur wins with 59 pts vs 57 pts for Tiggo 4 Cross

In structured scoring, Captur emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Tiggo 4 Cross may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the Captur edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: Captur 59 vs Tiggo 4 Cross 56. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: Captur 75, Tiggo 4 Cross 75. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: Captur 42, Tiggo 4 Cross 47. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: Captur 63, Tiggo 4 Cross 67. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: Captur 51, Tiggo 4 Cross 38. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The Captur edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The Captur scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between Captur and Tiggo 4 Cross in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Captur scores 51 vs 38.

Efficiency: Captur scores 59 vs 56.

Safety: Captur scores 75 vs 75.

Practicality: Captur scores 63 vs 67.

Ownership: Captur scores 42 vs 47.

Final structured scoring gives Captur the advantage in this comparison.