Renault Captur vs Ford EcoSport

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Ford EcoSport Discontinued model
Renault Captur in South Africa

Renault Captur

1.3L Turbo Esprit Alpine EDC Petrol 7-Speed DCT Current
ZAR 614,999 ex-showroom
⚡ 113 kW 🔧 270 Nm ⛽ 15.2 km/l
VS
Ford EcoSport in South Africa

Ford EcoSport

1.0 EcoBoost Titanium Automatic Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Discontinued model
ZAR 395,000 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 92 kW 🔧 170 Nm ⛽ 17.2 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Captur
Fuel Economy EcoSport
🛡 Safety Captur
📦 Practicality Captur
🔑 Ownership Not enough comparable data
Recorded price context Captur: current from ZAR 515,999 · EcoSport: last listed from ZAR 310,000

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec Captur EcoSport
Maximum Power 113 kW @ 6000 rpm 92 kW
Maximum Torque 270 Nm @ 1700 rpm 170 Nm
Engine Size 1300 cc 998 cc
Combined Fuel Economy 15.2 km/l 17.2 km/l
Ground Clearance 169 mm 200 mm
Boot / Load Bay 484 l 352 l
Airbags Front airbags 6
Kerb Weight 1365 kg 1290 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Warranty 5 Year / 150 000 km 4

= leads in this spec

Archived vehicles remain available for comparison. Verified specs stay visible; historical fields that were not source-confirmed are marked Not confirmed instead of being guessed.

The Bottom Line

Captur and EcoSport are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Captur +11 pts
Efficiency EcoSport +6 pts
Safety Captur +5 pts
Practicality Captur +2 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Catalogue-index leader

Captur

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

EcoSport

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Captur

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

EcoSport

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec Captur EcoSport
Model Introduced Year 2026 2013
Generation Current South Africa Captur range Single generation on Ford B2E platform. Produced in India for global markets. SA received the facelift model with improved interior quality and revised safety kit.
Facelift History Current South Africa version listed by official source Facelift in 2017 — revised front fascia and SYNC 3 infotainment introduced
Facelift Launched Since 2026 2017
Facelift Version Ending Current Not confirmed
Body Style SUV Not confirmed
Model Year 2026 Not confirmed
Production Status active Not confirmed
Segment SUV Not confirmed
Tare Mass Kg 1365 kg 1290 kg
Vehicle Type SUV Not confirmed
Spec Captur EcoSport
Length 4239 mm 4325 mm
Width 1797 mm 1765 mm
Height 1575 mm 1653 mm
Wheelbase 2639 mm 2519 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 169 mm 200 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 169 mm Not confirmed
Fuel Tank Capacity 48 l 52 l
Boot/Cargo Space 484 l 352 l
Kerb Weight 1365 kg 1290 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1800 kg 1740 kg
Payload Capacity 435 kg Not confirmed
Towing Capacity 1200 kg 950 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows Not confirmed
Doors 5 doors Not confirmed
Minimum Turning Radius 5.21 m Not confirmed
Front Headroom 939 mm Not confirmed
Rear Headroom 908 mm Not confirmed
Front Legroom 1060 mm Not confirmed
Rear Legroom 930 mm Not confirmed

Source-backed Catalogue Index

A transparent specification index shown only when every vehicle clears the minimum comparable-data threshold.

Weighted / 100
Catalogue-index readout

Captur leads by 4 points

Captur and EcoSport are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Index leader 65 /100
Lead 4 points
Data 65% source coverage
65
#1 Index leader

Captur

65% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Performance 51
Performance 51
Efficiency 59
Safety 91
Practicality 60
Leads by 4 points
61
#2

EcoSport

83% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 86 Check Performance 40
Performance 40
Efficiency 65
Safety 86
Practicality 58
Ownership 55
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Captur +11 Efficiency EcoSport +6 Safety Captur +5 Practicality Captur +2

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Catalogue-index leader

Captur

Performance 51/100
Efficiency 59/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 60/100

EcoSport

Performance 40/100
Efficiency 65/100
Safety 86/100
Practicality 58/100
Ownership 55/100

How to Read This Comparison

🏆 Renault Captur leads the catalogue index with 65 pts vs 61 pts for EcoSport

In Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index, Captur leads. However, EcoSport may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.

Hagalu does not publish a guaranteed resale winner. Depreciation depends on age, mileage, condition, derivative, colour, supply and demand. Compare several current used-market listings and obtain trade-in valuations for equivalent examples before relying on a resale estimate.

Check the exact derivatives for drive type, ground clearance, tyres, approach and departure angles, wading depth and low-range gearing where officially disclosed. SUV styling or all-wheel drive alone does not prove that a vehicle is suitable for demanding off-road use.

Calculate each exact derivative using your monthly distance and a current fuel or electricity price, then add finance, insurance, scheduled service, tyres and licence costs. Hagalu does not claim a fixed monthly saving without those buyer-specific inputs.

It is worth more only when the exact price difference buys equipment, space, performance or ownership cover that matters to you. Compare like-for-like lifecycle states and derivatives; a current offer and a historical last-listed price are not directly equivalent.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

This Captur and EcoSport comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Captur 51 vs EcoSport 40.

Efficiency index: Captur 59 vs EcoSport 65.

Safety-equipment index: Captur 91 vs EcoSport 86.

Practicality index: Captur 60 vs EcoSport 58.

Ownership-cover index: Captur not separately scored vs EcoSport 55.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.