Toyota Camry vs Mazda CX-5

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Toyota Camry Discontinued model
Toyota Camry in South Africa

Toyota Camry

2.5 Hybrid XSE CVT Hybrid e-CVT Discontinued model
ZAR 749,900 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 160 kW 🔧 221 Nm ⛽ 19.2 km/l
VS
Mazda CX-5 in South Africa

Mazda CX-5

2.0 Carbon Edition Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 688,400 ex-showroom
⚡ 121 kW 🔧 213 Nm ⛽ 14.5 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Toyota Camry vs Mazda CX-5: the short answer

Camry and CX-5 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Recorded price context Camry: last listed from ZAR 659,900 · CX-5: current from ZAR 570,500

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Camry CX-5
Maximum Power Camry160 kW @ 5700 rpm CX-5121 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque Camry221 Nm @ 3600 rpm CX-5213 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Engine Size Camry2487 cc CX-51998 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Camry19.2 km/l CX-514.5 km/l
Ground Clearance Camry140 mm CX-5200 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Toyota Camry

2.5 Hybrid XSE CVT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Mazda CX-5

2.0 Carbon Edition Auto FWD

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

Camry

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency

CX-5

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: General Use

Which One's Right for You?

Camry

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

CX-5

  • Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec Camry CX-5
Model Introduced Year 2019 2017
Generation Current generation Camry on TNGA platform Second-generation KF-series Mazda CX-5, current outgoing South African range
Facelift History Latest generation with hybrid technology The second generation arrived in 2017 and received a substantial update from 2021. An all-new replacement is scheduled to reach South Africa on 1 August 2026, while this current range remains on sale.
Facelift Launched Since 2021 2017
Facelift Version Ending 2024 Current
Body Style Sedan SUV
Model Year 2021 2026
Production Status discontinued Active
Segment Sedan Mid-size family SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1575 kg 1575 kg
Vehicle Type Sedan SUV
Spec Camry CX-5
Length 4885 mm 4575 mm
Width 1840 mm 1845 mm
Height 1445 mm 1680 mm
Wheelbase 2825 mm 2700 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 140 mm 200 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 125 mm -
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 l 56 l
Boot/Cargo Space 493 l 438 l
Kerb Weight 1575 kg 1575 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2055 kg 2065 kg
Payload Capacity 480 kg 490 kg
Towing Capacity 1600 kg 1000 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows -
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.8 m 5.95 m
Front Headroom 986 mm -
Rear Headroom 941 mm -
Front Legroom 1037 mm 1041 mm
Rear Legroom 899 mm 1007 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Camry and CX-5 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Camry 59 vs CX-5 48.

Efficiency index: Camry 79 vs CX-5 56.

Safety-equipment index: Camry 98 vs CX-5 88.

Practicality index: Camry 61 vs CX-5 61.

Ownership-cover index: Camry 43 vs CX-5 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Camry leads by 6 points

Camry and CX-5 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 69 /100
Lead 6 points
Data 91% source coverage
69
#1 Evidence leader

Camry

91% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Ownership 43
Performance 59
Efficiency 79
Safety 98
Practicality 61
Ownership 43
Leads by 6 points
63
#2

CX-5

78% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 88 Check Performance 48
Performance 48
Efficiency 56
Safety 88
Practicality 61
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Camry +11 Efficiency Camry +23 Safety Camry +10 Practicality Level

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Camry

Performance 59/100
Efficiency 79/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 61/100
Ownership 43/100

CX-5

Performance 48/100
Efficiency 56/100
Safety 88/100
Practicality 61/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Toyota Camry leads the specification evidence index with 69 pts vs 63 pts for CX-5

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Camry leads. However, CX-5 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

Camry
CamryDiscontinued
VS
Tiggo 8 Pro Max
Tiggo 8 Pro Max
Camry vs Tiggo 8 Pro Max →
Camry
CamryDiscontinued
VS
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
Camry vs E5 EM-i →
Camry
CamryDiscontinued
VS
Tiggo 7 PHEV
Tiggo 7 PHEV
Camry vs Tiggo 7 PHEV →
Camry
CamryDiscontinued
VS
06
06
Camry vs 06 →
Camry
CamryDiscontinued
VS
03T
03T
Camry vs 03T →
Camry
CamryDiscontinued
VS
SEALION 6 DM-i
SEALION 6 DM-i
Camry vs SEALION 6 DM-i →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
Tiggo 8 Pro Max
Tiggo 8 Pro Max
CX-5 vs Tiggo 8 Pro Max →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
CX-5 vs E5 EM-i →

Camry vs CX-5 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.