Omoda C9 SHS vs Lexus RX

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Omoda C9 SHS in South Africa

Omoda C9 SHS

C9 SHS AWD Plug-In Hybrid Automatic
ZAR 999,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 440 kW 🔧 915 Nm ⛽ 71.4 km/l
VS
Lexus RX in South Africa

Lexus RX

RX 350 F SPORT Petrol Automatic 8-speed
ZAR 1,642,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 205 kW 🔧 430 Nm ⛽ 11.5 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance C9 SHS
Fuel Economy C9 SHS
🛡 Safety Tie
📦 Practicality C9 SHS
🔑 Ownership RX
C9 SHS starts ZAR 1516500 cheaper C9 SHS from ZAR 999,900 · RX from ZAR 1,516,500

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec C9 SHS RX
Engine Power 440 kW 205 kW
Torque 915 Nm 430 Nm
Engine Size 1.5 cc 2400 cc
Claimed Mileage 71.4 km/l 11.5 km/l
Ground Clearance 165 mm 185 mm
Boot / Load Bay 660 l 612 l
Airbags Multiple airbags Side,Curtain,Driver,Passenger,Driver Knee,Passenger Seat Cushion
Kerb Weight - 1895-2005 kg
Seating Capacity 5 5
Warranty 7 Years / 200 000 km 7 years / 105,000km

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

C9 SHS has a slight advantage, but RX remains highly competitive.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance C9 SHS +13 pts
Efficiency C9 SHS +50 pts
Safety Equal
Practicality C9 SHS +5 pts
Ownership RX +24 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

🏆 Overall Winner

C9 SHS

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • More practical for daily use
Weak Spots
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

RX

Strengths
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best suited to: General Use

Which One's Right for You?

C9 SHS

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

RX

  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec C9 SHS RX
Model Introduced Year 2025 2023
Generation Current South Africa C9 SHS range Fifth-generation Lexus RX luxury SUV
Facelift History Current South Africa version listed by official source Current fifth-generation South African range with petrol, hybrid, performance-hybrid and plug-in-hybrid choices
Facelift Launched Since 2025 Current fifth-generation South African range with petrol, hybrid, performance-hybrid and plug-in-hybrid choices
Facelift Version Ending Current Current South African specification checked 2026-07-17
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active published
Segment SUV Luxury SUV
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec C9 SHS RX
Ground Clearance 165 mm 185 mm
Wheelbase 2800 mm 2850 mm
Length 4775 mm 4890 mm
Width 1920 mm 1920 mm
Height 1671 mm 1695 mm
Kerb Weight - 1895-2005 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight 2717 kg 2590 kg
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 660 l 612 l
Towing Capacity - 2000 kg
Front Track Width - 1655 mm
Rear Track Width - 1695 mm
Turning Radius - 5.9 m
Load Bed Length 660 l 612 l
Load Bed Width - -
Front Legroom - -
Rear Legroom - -
Front Headroom - -
Rear Headroom - -
Front Shoulder Room - -
Rear Shoulder Room - -
Boot Space Seats Folded 1783 l -
Number of Doors 5 5
Max Payload - 585-695 kg
Boot Volume 660 l 612 l
Doors 5 5
Seats 5 5
Fuel Tank Capacity - 67.5 l
Gross Vehicle Mass Kg 2717 kg 2590 kg
Ground Clearance Max 165 mm 185 mm
Ground Clearance Min 165 mm 185 mm
Ground Clearance Mm 165 mm 185 mm
Height Mm 1671 mm 1695 mm
Length Mm 4775 mm 4890 mm
Loadbox Length Mm 660 l 612 l
Loadbox Width Mm - -
Payload Kg - 585-695 kg
Cargo Volume 660 l 612 l
Tare Mass Kg - 1895-2005 kg
Turning Circle - 5.9 m
Turning Circle M - 5.9 m
Width Mm 1920 mm 1920 mm

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

C9 SHS leads by 9 points

C9 SHS has a slight advantage, but RX remains highly competitive.

Winner 88 /100
Lead 9 points
Data 72% confidence
88
#1 Winner

C9 SHS

72% data confidence 4 strong categories
Best at Performance 98 Check Ownership 69
Performance 98
Efficiency 96
Safety 94
Practicality 78
Ownership 69
Leads by 9 points
79
#2

RX

79% data confidence 4 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Efficiency 46
Performance 85
Efficiency 46
Safety 94
Practicality 73
Ownership 93
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance C9 SHS +13 Efficiency C9 SHS +50 Safety Level Practicality C9 SHS +5 Ownership RX +24

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

C9 SHS

Performance 98/100
Efficiency 96/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 78/100
Ownership 69/100

RX

Performance 85/100
Efficiency 46/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 73/100
Ownership 93/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 Omoda C9 SHS wins with 88 pts vs 79 pts for RX

In structured scoring, C9 SHS emerges as the stronger overall package. However, RX may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the C9 SHS edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: C9 SHS 96 vs RX 46. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: C9 SHS 94, RX 94. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: C9 SHS 69, RX 93. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: C9 SHS 78, RX 73. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: C9 SHS 98, RX 85. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The C9 SHS edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The C9 SHS scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between C9 SHS and RX in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: C9 SHS scores 98 vs 85.

Efficiency: C9 SHS scores 96 vs 46.

Safety: C9 SHS scores 94 vs 94.

Practicality: C9 SHS scores 78 vs 73.

Ownership: C9 SHS scores 69 vs 93.

Final structured scoring gives C9 SHS the advantage in this comparison.