Omoda C9 SHS vs GWM H6 GT PHEV

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Omoda C9 SHS in South Africa

Omoda C9 SHS

C9 SHS AWD Plug-In Hybrid Automatic
ZAR 999,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 440 kW 🔧 915 Nm ⛽ 71.4 km/l
VS
GWM H6 GT PHEV in South Africa

GWM H6 GT PHEV

1.5T Ultra Luxury 4WD PHEV DHT Phev Automatic
ZAR 799,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 321 kW 🔧 762 Nm ⛽ 125 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance H6 GT PHEV
Fuel Economy H6 GT PHEV
🛡 Safety C9 SHS
📦 Practicality C9 SHS
🔑 Ownership C9 SHS
H6 GT PHEV starts ZAR 999900 cheaper C9 SHS from ZAR 999,900 · H6 GT PHEV from ZAR 799,900

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec C9 SHS H6 GT PHEV
Engine Power 440 kW 321 kW
Torque 915 Nm 762 Nm
Engine Size 1.5 cc 1500 cc
Claimed Mileage 71.4 km/l 125 km/l
Ground Clearance 165 mm 170 mm
Boot / Load Bay 660 l 392 l
Airbags Multiple airbags Front double, front side and side curtain airbags
Kerb Weight - 2075 kg
Seating Capacity 5 5
Warranty 7 Years / 200 000 km 5 Years / 100,000 km

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

C9 SHS holds a noticeable edge over H6 GT PHEV, especially in key ownership areas.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance H6 GT PHEV +2 pts
Efficiency H6 GT PHEV +1 pts
Safety C9 SHS +85 pts
Practicality C9 SHS +18 pts
Ownership C9 SHS +4 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

🏆 Overall Winner

C9 SHS

Strengths
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Family Usage

H6 GT PHEV

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

C9 SHS

  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

H6 GT PHEV

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec C9 SHS H6 GT PHEV
Model Introduced Year 2025 Current local generation year not confirmed
Generation Current South Africa C9 SHS range Current South African H6 GT PHEV listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data.
Facelift History Current South Africa version listed by official source Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle.
Facelift Launched Since 2025 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV Coupe SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active published
Segment SUV SUV
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Color Note - Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering.
Dealer Stock Note - Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup
Drivetrain Note - Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 1.5T Ultra Luxury 4WD PHEV DHT
Spec C9 SHS H6 GT PHEV
Ground Clearance 165 mm 170 mm
Wheelbase 2800 mm 2738 mm
Length 4775 mm 4727 mm
Width 1920 mm 1940 mm
Height 1671 mm 1729 mm
Kerb Weight - 2075 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight 2717 kg 2525 kg
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 660 l 392 l
Towing Capacity - 1500 kg
Front Track Width - -
Rear Track Width - -
Turning Radius - -
Load Bed Length 660 l 392 l
Load Bed Width - -
Front Legroom - -
Rear Legroom - -
Front Headroom - -
Rear Headroom - -
Front Shoulder Room - -
Rear Shoulder Room - -
Boot Space Seats Folded 1783 l 1390 l
Number of Doors 5 5
Max Payload - -
Boot Volume 660 l 392 l
Doors 5 5
Seats 5 5
Fuel Tank Capacity - 55 l
Gross Vehicle Mass Kg 2717 kg 2525 kg
Ground Clearance Max 165 mm 170 mm
Ground Clearance Min 165 mm 170 mm
Ground Clearance Mm 165 mm 170 mm
Height Mm 1671 mm 1729 mm
Length Mm 4775 mm 4727 mm
Loadbox Length Mm 660 l 392 l
Loadbox Width Mm - -
Payload Kg - -
Cargo Volume 660 l 392 l
Tare Mass Kg - 2075 kg
Turning Circle - -
Turning Circle M - -
Width Mm 1920 mm 1940 mm

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

C9 SHS leads by 23 points

C9 SHS holds a noticeable edge over H6 GT PHEV, especially in key ownership areas.

Winner 88 /100
Lead 23 points
Data 72% confidence
88
#1 Winner

C9 SHS

72% data confidence 4 strong categories
Best at Performance 98 Check Ownership 69
Performance 98
Efficiency 96
Safety 94
Practicality 78
Ownership 69
Leads by 23 points
65
#2

H6 GT PHEV

81% data confidence 2 strong categories
Best at Performance 100 Check Safety 9
Performance 100
Efficiency 97
Safety 9
Practicality 60
Ownership 65
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance H6 GT PHEV +2 Efficiency H6 GT PHEV +1 Safety C9 SHS +85 Practicality C9 SHS +18 Ownership C9 SHS +4

Moderate difference between the models.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

C9 SHS

Performance 98/100
Efficiency 96/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 78/100
Ownership 69/100

H6 GT PHEV

Performance 100/100
Efficiency 97/100
Safety 9/100
Practicality 60/100
Ownership 65/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 Omoda C9 SHS wins with 88 pts vs 65 pts for H6 GT PHEV

In structured scoring, C9 SHS emerges as the stronger overall package. However, H6 GT PHEV may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the C9 SHS edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: C9 SHS 96 vs H6 GT PHEV 97. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: C9 SHS 94, H6 GT PHEV 9. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: C9 SHS 69, H6 GT PHEV 65. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: C9 SHS 78, H6 GT PHEV 60. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: C9 SHS 98, H6 GT PHEV 100. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The C9 SHS edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The C9 SHS scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between C9 SHS and H6 GT PHEV in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: C9 SHS scores 98 vs 100.

Efficiency: C9 SHS scores 96 vs 97.

Safety: C9 SHS scores 94 vs 9.

Practicality: C9 SHS scores 78 vs 60.

Ownership: C9 SHS scores 69 vs 65.

Final structured scoring gives C9 SHS the advantage in this comparison.