Omoda C5 vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Omoda C5 in South Africa

Omoda C5

Street Plus Petrol 6-Speed DCT Current
ZAR 339,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 115 kW 🔧 230 Nm ⛽ 14.5 km/l
VS
Rolls-Royce Cullinan in South Africa

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Cullinan Series II Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
Price on request
⚡ 420 kW 🔧 850 Nm ⛽ 5.95 km/l
Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Omoda C5 vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan: the short answer

Cullinan holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over C5.

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification C5 Cullinan
Maximum Power C5115 kW @ 5500 rpm Cullinan420 kW @ 5000-6000 rpm
Maximum Torque C5230 Nm Cullinan850 Nm @ 1600-4250 rpm
Engine Size C51500 cc Cullinan6749 cc
Combined Fuel Economy C514.5 km/l Cullinan5.95 km/l
Ground Clearance C5169 mm Cullinan173 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

C5

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

Cullinan

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

C5

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Cullinan

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec C5 Cullinan
Model Introduced Year 2023 2018
Generation Current South Africa C5 range Cullinan Series II, the current evolution of the marque's five-door super-luxury SUV
Facelift History Current South Africa version listed by official source Cullinan was introduced in South Africa in 2018 and received its most extensive evolution as Cullinan Series II in May 2024
Facelift Launched Since 2023 2024
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV Five-door luxury SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment SUV Full-size super-luxury SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1381 kg -
Vehicle Type SUV Internal-combustion sport utility vehicle
Spec C5 Cullinan
Length 4400 mm 5355 mm
Width 1830 mm 2000 mm
Height 1590 mm 1835 mm
Wheelbase 2630 mm 3295 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 169 mm 173 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 145 mm 173 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 51 l 90 l
Boot/Cargo Space 442 l 612 l
Kerb Weight 1381 kg 2725 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1856 kg 3300 kg
Payload Capacity 475 kg 575 kg
Towing Capacity 1200 kg 2700 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.1 m 6.6 m
Front Headroom 1000 mm 1064 mm
Rear Headroom 970 mm 1026 mm
Front Legroom 1050 mm 1006 mm
Rear Legroom 900 mm 1090 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This C5 and Cullinan comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: C5 51 vs Cullinan 99.

Efficiency index: C5 56 vs Cullinan 28.

Safety-equipment index: C5 91 vs Cullinan 99.

Practicality index: C5 59 vs Cullinan 75.

Ownership-cover index: C5 not separately scored vs Cullinan not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Cullinan leads by 15 points

Cullinan holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over C5.

Evidence leader 79 /100
Lead 15 points
Data 83% source coverage
79
#1 Evidence leader

Cullinan

83% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Performance 99 Check Efficiency 28
Performance 99
Efficiency 28
Safety 99
Practicality 75
Leads by 15 points
64
#2

C5

69% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Performance 51
Performance 51
Efficiency 56
Safety 91
Practicality 59
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Cullinan +48 Efficiency C5 +28 Safety Cullinan +8 Practicality Cullinan +16

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Cullinan

Performance 99/100
Efficiency 28/100
Safety 99/100
Practicality 75/100

C5

Performance 51/100
Efficiency 56/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 59/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Rolls-Royce Cullinan leads the specification evidence index with 79 pts vs 64 pts for C5

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Cullinan leads. However, C5 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

C5 vs Cullinan questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.