Omoda C5 vs Hyundai Creta

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Hyundai Creta Discontinued model
Omoda C5 in South Africa

Omoda C5

Street Plus Petrol 6-Speed DCT Current
ZAR 339,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 115 kW 🔧 230 Nm ⛽ 14.5 km/l
VS
Hyundai Creta in South Africa

Hyundai Creta

1.5 IVT Fluid Petrol Discontinued model
ZAR 456,900 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 85 kW 🔧 144 Nm ⛽ 16.8 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Omoda C5 vs Hyundai Creta: the short answer

C5 and Creta are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Recorded price context C5: current from ZAR 339,900 · Creta: last listed from ZAR 407,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification C5 Creta
Maximum Power C5115 kW @ 5500 rpm Creta85 kW @ 6300 rpm
Maximum Torque C5230 Nm Creta144 Nm @ 4500 rpm
Engine Size C51500 cc Creta1497 cc
Combined Fuel Economy C514.5 km/l Creta16.8 km/l
Ground Clearance C5169 mm Creta200 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Evidence for Hyundai Creta 1.5 IVT Fluid

Source type: Hagalu catalogue record

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

C5

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

Creta

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

C5

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Creta

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec C5 Creta
Model Introduced Year 2023 2016
Generation Current South Africa C5 range Second generation Creta built on Hyundai's i-GMP platform; the SA model is a popular variant shared with several emerging markets
Facelift History Current South Africa version listed by official source Second generation arrived in SA in 2021 with significant upgrades to interior quality, safety tech, and engine options; notably improved over the first-gen car
Facelift Launched Since 2023 2021
Facelift Version Ending Current Not confirmed
Body Style SUV Not confirmed
Model Year 2026 Not confirmed
Production Status active Not confirmed
Segment SUV Not confirmed
Tare Mass Kg 1381 kg 1365 kg
Vehicle Type SUV Not confirmed
Spec C5 Creta
Length 4400 mm 4330 mm
Width 1830 mm 1790 mm
Height 1590 mm 1635 mm
Wheelbase 2630 mm 2610 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 169 mm 200 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 145 mm Not confirmed
Fuel Tank Capacity 51 l 50 l
Boot/Cargo Space 442 l 433 l
Kerb Weight 1381 kg 1365 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1856 kg 1860 kg
Payload Capacity 475 kg Not confirmed
Towing Capacity 1200 kg Not confirmed
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows Not confirmed
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.1 m 5.3 m
Front Headroom 1000 mm Not confirmed
Rear Headroom 970 mm Not confirmed
Front Legroom 1050 mm Not confirmed
Rear Legroom 900 mm Not confirmed

In depth: how these cars differ

This C5 and Creta comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: C5 51 vs Creta 36.

Efficiency index: C5 56 vs Creta 65.

Safety-equipment index: C5 91 vs Creta 87.

Practicality index: C5 59 vs Creta 69.

Ownership-cover index: C5 not separately scored vs Creta 65.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

C5 leads by 0 points

C5 and Creta are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 64 /100
Lead 0 points
Data 69% source coverage
64
#1 Evidence leader

C5

69% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Performance 51
Performance 51
Efficiency 56
Safety 91
Practicality 59
Leads by 0 points
64
#2

Creta

89% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 87 Check Performance 36
Performance 36
Efficiency 65
Safety 87
Practicality 69
Ownership 65
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance C5 +15 Efficiency Creta +9 Safety C5 +4 Practicality Creta +10

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

C5

Performance 51/100
Efficiency 56/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 59/100

Creta

Performance 36/100
Efficiency 65/100
Safety 87/100
Practicality 69/100
Ownership 65/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Omoda C5 leads the specification evidence index with 64 pts vs 64 pts for Creta

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, C5 leads. However, Creta may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South African models and comparable body styles.

C5
C5
VS
C5-X
C5-X
C5 vs C5-X →
C5
C5
VS
Elevate
Elevate
C5 vs Elevate →
C5
C5
VS
Coolray
Coolray
C5 vs Coolray →
C5
C5
VS
ORA 5
ORA 5
C5 vs ORA 5 →
C5
C5
VS
Grand Vitara
Grand Vitara
C5 vs Grand Vitara →
C5
C5
VS
UNI-S
UNI-S
C5 vs UNI-S →
Creta
CretaDiscontinued
VS
C5-X
C5-X
Creta vs C5-X →
Creta
CretaDiscontinued
VS
Elevate
Elevate
Creta vs Elevate →

C5 vs Creta questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.