Omoda C5 SHS vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Omoda C5 SHS in South Africa

Omoda C5 SHS

C5 SHS Plug-in Hybrid Current
ZAR 469,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 150 kW 🔧 310 Nm ⛽ 20.4 km/l
VS
Rolls-Royce Cullinan in South Africa

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Cullinan Series II Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
Price on request
⚡ 420 kW 🔧 850 Nm ⛽ 5.95 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Cullinan
Fuel Economy C5 SHS
🛡 Safety Cullinan
📦 Practicality Cullinan
🔑 Ownership C5 SHS

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec C5 SHS Cullinan
Maximum Power 150 kW @ 5500 rpm 420 kW @ 5000-6000 rpm
Maximum Torque 310 Nm 850 Nm @ 1600-4250 rpm
Engine Size 1500 cc 6749 cc
Claimed Mileage 20.4 km/l 5.95 km/l
Ground Clearance 169 mm 173 mm
Boot / Load Bay 372 l 612 l
Airbags Multiple airbags 8
Kerb Weight 1546 kg 2725 kg
Seating Capacity - -
Warranty 5 Years / 150 000 km 4 years; regional conditions apply

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

Both C5 SHS and Cullinan are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Cullinan +37 pts
Efficiency C5 SHS +54 pts
Safety Cullinan +5 pts
Practicality Cullinan +20 pts
Ownership C5 SHS +11 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

C5 SHS

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best suited to: Fuel Efficiency
🏆 Overall Winner

Cullinan

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: Highway Driving Family Usage

Which One's Right for You?

C5 SHS

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Cullinan

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec C5 SHS Cullinan
Model Introduced Year 2026 2018
Generation Current South Africa C5 SHS range Cullinan Series II, the current evolution of the marque's five-door super-luxury SUV
Facelift History Current South Africa version listed by official source Cullinan was introduced in South Africa in 2018 and received its most extensive evolution as Cullinan Series II in May 2024
Facelift Launched Since 2026 2024
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV Five-door luxury SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment SUV Full-size super-luxury SUV
Vehicle Type SUV Internal-combustion sport utility vehicle
Tare Mass Kg 1546 kg -
Spec C5 SHS Cullinan
Drivetrain Layout FWD All-wheel drive with all-wheel steering
LSD Available Not Applicable -
Transfer Case Not Applicable ATC 13 transfer case
Differential Lock Not Applicable No lockable differential
Paddle Shifters Standard No
Gearbox DHT 8-speed ZF automatic
Final Drive Ratio Not Applicable 2.81:1
Number of Gears Hybrid DHT 8
Transmission Type Automatic 8-speed ZF automatic
Clutch Type Automatic clutch Torque converter
Gear Shift Indicator Standard -
Drivetrain FWD All-wheel drive
4WD Engagement Not Applicable Everywhere off-road capability engaged by one button
4WD Hi Range Not Applicable Not Applicable
4WD Lo Range Not Applicable Not Applicable
4WD Selector Not Applicable Everywhere button
Automatic Shift Paddles Standard No
Front Differential Lock Not Applicable Not Applicable
Gearbox Type DHT 8-speed ZF automatic
Low Range Ratio Not Applicable Not Applicable
Low Range Not Applicable Not Applicable
Axle Layout FWD All-wheel-drive power delivery with active rear-axle steering
Rear Differential Lock Not Applicable Not Applicable
Transmission Speeds Hybrid DHT 8
Gear Shift Type Electric Satellite Aided automatic gear selection

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

Cullinan leads by 3 points

Both C5 SHS and Cullinan are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Winner 73 /100
Lead 3 points
Data 94% confidence
73
#1 Winner

Cullinan

94% data confidence 3 strong categories
Best at Performance 99 Check Efficiency 28
Performance 99
Efficiency 28
Safety 99
Practicality 75
Ownership 44
Leads by 3 points
70
#2

C5 SHS

76% data confidence 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Practicality 55
Performance 62
Efficiency 82
Safety 94
Practicality 55
Ownership 55
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Cullinan +37 Efficiency C5 SHS +54 Safety Cullinan +5 Practicality Cullinan +20 Ownership C5 SHS +11

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

Cullinan

Performance 99/100
Efficiency 28/100
Safety 99/100
Practicality 75/100
Ownership 44/100

C5 SHS

Performance 62/100
Efficiency 82/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 55/100
Ownership 55/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 Rolls-Royce Cullinan wins with 73 pts vs 70 pts for C5 SHS

In structured scoring, Cullinan emerges as the stronger overall package. However, C5 SHS may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the Cullinan edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: C5 SHS 82 vs Cullinan 28. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: C5 SHS 94, Cullinan 99. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: C5 SHS 55, Cullinan 44. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: C5 SHS 55, Cullinan 75. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: C5 SHS 62, Cullinan 99. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The Cullinan edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The Cullinan scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between C5 SHS and Cullinan in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: C5 SHS scores 62 vs 99.

Efficiency: C5 SHS scores 82 vs 28.

Safety: C5 SHS scores 94 vs 99.

Practicality: C5 SHS scores 55 vs 75.

Ownership: C5 SHS scores 55 vs 44.

Final structured scoring gives Cullinan the advantage in this comparison.