Omoda C5 SHS vs Mahindra Scorpio-N

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Omoda C5 SHS in South Africa

Omoda C5 SHS

C5 SHS Hybrid 1-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 469,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 105 kW 🔧 215 Nm ⛽ 20.4 km/l
VS
Mahindra Scorpio-N in South Africa

Mahindra Scorpio-N

Z8L 4x4 AT Adventure Diesel 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 699,999 ex-showroom
⚡ 129 kW 🔧 400 Nm ⛽ 14.5 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Omoda C5 SHS vs Mahindra Scorpio-N: the short answer

C5 SHS and Scorpio-N are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

C5 SHS starts ZAR 20,099 cheaper C5 SHS from ZAR 469,900 · Scorpio-N from ZAR 489,999

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification C5 SHS Scorpio-N
Maximum Power C5 SHS105 kW @ 5200 rpm Scorpio-N128.6 kW @ 3500 rpm
Maximum Torque C5 SHS215 Nm @ 2500-4000 rpm Scorpio-N400 Nm
Engine Size C5 SHS1500 cc Scorpio-N2184 cc
Combined Fuel Economy C5 SHS20.4 km/l Scorpio-N14.5 km/l
Ground Clearance C5 SHS145 mm Scorpio-N187 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

C5 SHS

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

Scorpio-N

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

C5 SHS

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Scorpio-N

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec C5 SHS Scorpio-N
Model Introduced Year 2026 Not Available
Generation Current South Africa C5 SHS range Current local listing
Facelift History Current South Africa version listed by official source Not listed by current South African source page.
Facelift Launched Since 2026 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 Current
Production Status active Active
Segment SUV SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1546 kg 1825-2070 kg
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec C5 SHS Scorpio-N
Length 4400 mm 4662 mm
Width 1830 mm 1918 mm
Height 1590 mm 1905 mm
Wheelbase 2630 mm 2750 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 145 mm 187 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 125 mm -
Fuel Tank Capacity 51 l 57 l
Boot/Cargo Space 372 l 460 l
Kerb Weight 1546 kg -
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2052 kg -
Payload Capacity 506 kg -
Towing Capacity 750 kg -
Seating Capacity 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows -
Doors 5 doors -
Minimum Turning Radius 5.1 m -
Front Headroom 1000 mm -
Rear Headroom 970 mm -
Front Legroom 1050 mm -
Rear Legroom 900 mm -

In depth: how these cars differ

This C5 SHS and Scorpio-N comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: C5 SHS 51 vs Scorpio-N 69.

Efficiency index: C5 SHS 82 vs Scorpio-N 60.

Safety-equipment index: C5 SHS 94 vs Scorpio-N 90.

Practicality index: C5 SHS 52 vs Scorpio-N 78.

Ownership-cover index: C5 SHS not separately scored vs Scorpio-N not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Scorpio-N leads by 6 points

C5 SHS and Scorpio-N are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 75 /100
Lead 6 points
Data 54% source coverage
75
#1 Evidence leader

Scorpio-N

54% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 90 Check Efficiency 60
Performance 69
Efficiency 60
Safety 90
Practicality 78
Leads by 6 points
69
#2

C5 SHS

72% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Performance 51
Performance 51
Efficiency 82
Safety 94
Practicality 52
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Scorpio-N +18 Efficiency C5 SHS +22 Safety C5 SHS +4 Practicality Scorpio-N +26

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Scorpio-N

Performance 69/100
Efficiency 60/100
Safety 90/100
Practicality 78/100

C5 SHS

Performance 51/100
Efficiency 82/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 52/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mahindra Scorpio-N leads the specification evidence index with 75 pts vs 69 pts for C5 SHS

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Scorpio-N leads. However, C5 SHS may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South African models and comparable body styles.

C5 SHS
C5 SHS
VS
HR-V
HR-V
C5 SHS vs HR-V →
C5 SHS
C5 SHS
VS
Destinator
Destinator
C5 SHS vs Destinator →
C5 SHS
C5 SHS
VS
Duster
Duster
C5 SHS vs Duster →
C5 SHS
C5 SHS
VS
XUV700
XUV700
C5 SHS vs XUV700 →
C5 SHS
C5 SHS
VS
ALCAZAR
ALCAZAR
C5 SHS vs ALCAZAR →
C5 SHS
C5 SHS
VS
HS
HS
C5 SHS vs HS →
Scorpio-N
Scorpio-N
VS
HR-V
HR-V
Scorpio-N vs HR-V →
Scorpio-N
Scorpio-N
VS
Destinator
Destinator
Scorpio-N vs Destinator →

C5 SHS vs Scorpio-N questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.