Toyota C-HR vs Mahindra XUV700

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Toyota C-HR Discontinued model
Toyota C-HR in South Africa

Toyota C-HR

2.0 HEV GR Sport CVT Hybrid e-CVT Discontinued model
ZAR 499,000 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 134 kW 🔧 190 Nm ⛽ 19.2 km/l
VS
Mahindra XUV700 in South Africa

Mahindra XUV700

AX7L BE Automatic Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 627,899 ex-showroom
⚡ 149 kW 🔧 380 Nm ⛽ 13 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Toyota C-HR vs Mahindra XUV700: the short answer

C-HR and XUV700 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Recorded price context C-HR: last listed from ZAR 429,000 · XUV700: current from ZAR 495,199

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification C-HR XUV700
Maximum Power C-HR134 kW XUV700149 kW @ 5000 rpm
Maximum Torque C-HR190 Nm XUV700380 Nm
Engine Size C-HR1987 cc XUV7001997 cc
Combined Fuel Economy C-HR19.2 km/l XUV70013 km/l
Ground Clearance C-HR160 mm XUV700200 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

C-HR

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

XUV700

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

C-HR

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

XUV700

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec C-HR XUV700
Model Introduced Year 2023 Not Available
Generation Second generation on TNGA-C platform – hybrid-only in SA Current local listing
Facelift History All-new second generation launched in SA in 2023 Not listed by current South African source page.
Facelift Launched Since 2023 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending 2024 Current
Body Style 5-door Crossover SUV SUV
Model Year 2021 Current
Production Status discontinued Active
Segment SUV SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1500 kg 2040 kg
Vehicle Type 5-door Crossover SUV SUV
Spec C-HR XUV700
Length 4390 mm 4695 mm
Width 1796 mm 1890 mm
Height 1550 mm 1755 mm
Wheelbase 2640 mm 2750 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 160 mm 200 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 125 mm -
Fuel Tank Capacity 43 l 60 l
Boot/Cargo Space 377 l 240 l
Kerb Weight 1500 kg 2040 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1930 kg -
Payload Capacity 430 kg -
Towing Capacity 1600 kg -
Seating Capacity 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows -
Doors 1 doors -
Minimum Turning Radius 5.4 m -
Front Headroom 993 mm -
Rear Headroom 946 mm -
Front Legroom 1030 mm -
Rear Legroom 881 mm -

In depth: how these cars differ

This C-HR and XUV700 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: C-HR 53 vs XUV700 66.

Efficiency index: C-HR 78 vs XUV700 53.

Safety-equipment index: C-HR 98 vs XUV700 94.

Practicality index: C-HR 57 vs XUV700 67.

Ownership-cover index: C-HR 43 vs XUV700 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

XUV700 leads by 4 points

C-HR and XUV700 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 71 /100
Lead 4 points
Data 58% source coverage
71
#1 Evidence leader

XUV700

58% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Efficiency 53
Performance 66
Efficiency 53
Safety 94
Practicality 67
Leads by 4 points
67
#2

C-HR

91% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Ownership 43
Performance 53
Efficiency 78
Safety 98
Practicality 57
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance XUV700 +13 Efficiency C-HR +25 Safety C-HR +4 Practicality XUV700 +10

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

XUV700

Performance 66/100
Efficiency 53/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 67/100

C-HR

Performance 53/100
Efficiency 78/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 57/100
Ownership 43/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mahindra XUV700 leads the specification evidence index with 71 pts vs 67 pts for C-HR

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, XUV700 leads. However, C-HR may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

C-HR
C-HRDiscontinued
VS
X70 Plus
X70 Plus
C-HR vs X70 Plus →
C-HR
C-HRDiscontinued
VS
C5 SHS
C5 SHS
C-HR vs C5 SHS →
C-HR
C-HRDiscontinued
VS
Outlander Sport
Outlander Sport
C-HR vs Outlander Sport →
C-HR
C-HRDiscontinued
VS
ATTO 2 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i
C-HR vs ATTO 2 DM-i →
C-HR
C-HRDiscontinued
VS
Jimny
Jimny
C-HR vs Jimny →
C-HR
C-HRDiscontinued
VS
CX-3
CX-3
C-HR vs CX-3 →
XUV700
XUV700
VS
X70 Plus
X70 Plus
XUV700 vs X70 Plus →
XUV700
XUV700
VS
C5 SHS
C5 SHS
XUV700 vs C5 SHS →

C-HR vs XUV700 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.