Toyota C-HR vs Toyota Land Cruiser 300

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Toyota C-HR Discontinued model
Toyota C-HR in South Africa

Toyota C-HR

2.0 HEV GR Sport CVT Hybrid e-CVT Discontinued model
ZAR 499,000 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 134 kW 🔧 190 Nm ⛽ 19.2 km/l
VS
Toyota Land Cruiser 300 in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser 300

3.3D VX-R 4x4 Automatic Diesel 10-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 2,149,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 227 kW 🔧 700 Nm ⛽ 9.4 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Toyota C-HR vs Toyota Land Cruiser 300: the short answer

Land Cruiser 300 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while C-HR remains close.

Recorded price context C-HR: last listed from ZAR 429,000 · Land Cruiser 300: current from ZAR 1,849,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification C-HR Land Cruiser 300
Maximum Power C-HR134 kW Land Cruiser 300227 kW
Maximum Torque C-HR190 Nm Land Cruiser 300700 Nm
Engine Size C-HR1987 cc Land Cruiser 3003346 cc
Combined Fuel Economy C-HR19.2 km/l Land Cruiser 3009.4 km/l
Ground Clearance C-HR160 mm Land Cruiser 300235 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

C-HR

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

Land Cruiser 300

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

C-HR

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Land Cruiser 300

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec C-HR Land Cruiser 300
Model Introduced Year 2023 2021
Generation Second generation on TNGA-C platform – hybrid-only in SA 300-series Land Cruiser on latest LGAA platform
Facelift History All-new second generation launched in SA in 2023 New generation introduced in 2021 with complete redesign
Facelift Launched Since 2023 2021
Facelift Version Ending 2024 Current
Body Style 5-door Crossover SUV SUV
Model Year 2021 2026
Production Status discontinued active
Segment SUV SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1500 kg 2430 kg
Vehicle Type 5-door Crossover SUV SUV
Color Note Not confirmed White, Black, Silver, Grey, Dark Blue, Bronze
Dealer Stock Note Not confirmed Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup
Drivetrain Note Not confirmed Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 3.3D VX-R 4x4 Automatic
Spec C-HR Land Cruiser 300
Length 4390 mm 4985 mm
Width 1796 mm 1980 mm
Height 1550 mm 1910 mm
Wheelbase 2640 mm 2850 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 160 mm 235 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 125 mm 125 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 43 l 110 l
Boot/Cargo Space 377 l 309 l
Kerb Weight 1500 kg 2430 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1930 kg 3300 kg
Payload Capacity 430 kg 870 kg
Towing Capacity 1600 kg 3500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 3 rows
Doors 1 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.4 m 6 m
Front Headroom 993 mm 1010 mm
Rear Headroom 946 mm 957 mm
Front Legroom 1030 mm 1105 mm
Rear Legroom 881 mm 900 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This C-HR and Land Cruiser 300 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: C-HR 53 vs Land Cruiser 300 95.

Efficiency index: C-HR 78 vs Land Cruiser 300 40.

Safety-equipment index: C-HR 98 vs Land Cruiser 300 99.

Practicality index: C-HR 57 vs Land Cruiser 300 82.

Ownership-cover index: C-HR 43 vs Land Cruiser 300 43.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Land Cruiser 300 leads by 9 points

Land Cruiser 300 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while C-HR remains close.

Evidence leader 76 /100
Lead 9 points
Data 92% source coverage
76
#1 Evidence leader

Land Cruiser 300

92% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 99 Check Efficiency 40
Performance 95
Efficiency 40
Safety 99
Practicality 82
Ownership 43
Leads by 9 points
67
#2

C-HR

91% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Ownership 43
Performance 53
Efficiency 78
Safety 98
Practicality 57
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Land Cruiser 300 +42 Efficiency C-HR +38 Safety Land Cruiser 300 +1 Practicality Land Cruiser 300 +25 Ownership Level

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Land Cruiser 300

Performance 95/100
Efficiency 40/100
Safety 99/100
Practicality 82/100
Ownership 43/100

C-HR

Performance 53/100
Efficiency 78/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 57/100
Ownership 43/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Toyota Land Cruiser 300 leads the specification evidence index with 76 pts vs 67 pts for C-HR

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Land Cruiser 300 leads. However, C-HR may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

C-HR
C-HRDiscontinued
VS
Tank 500
Tank 500
C-HR vs Tank 500 →
C-HR
C-HRDiscontinued
VS
SEALION 7
SEALION 7
C-HR vs SEALION 7 →
C-HR
C-HRDiscontinued
VS
bZ4X
bZ4X
C-HR vs bZ4X →
C-HR
C-HRDiscontinued
VS
X4
X4
C-HR vs X4 →
C-HR
C-HRDiscontinued
VS
NX
NX
C-HR vs NX →
C-HR
C-HRDiscontinued
VS
iX1
iX1
C-HR vs iX1 →
Land Cruiser 300
Land Cruiser 300
VS
Tank 500
Tank 500
Land Cruiser 300 vs Tank 500 →
Land Cruiser 300
Land Cruiser 300
VS
SEALION 7
SEALION 7
Land Cruiser 300 vs SEALION 7 →

C-HR vs Land Cruiser 300 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.