Toyota C-HR vs Mitsubishi Destinator

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Toyota C-HR Discontinued model
Toyota C-HR in South Africa

Toyota C-HR

2.0 HEV GR Sport CVT Hybrid e-CVT Discontinued model
ZAR 499,000 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 134 kW 🔧 190 Nm ⛽ 19.2 km/l
VS
Mitsubishi Destinator in South Africa

Mitsubishi Destinator

Exceed 1.5T CVT Petrol CVT Current
ZAR 569,990 ex-showroom
⚡ 120 kW 🔧 250 Nm ⛽ 13.9 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance C-HR
Fuel Economy C-HR
🛡 Safety C-HR
📦 Practicality Destinator
🔑 Ownership Not enough comparable data
Recorded price context C-HR: last listed from ZAR 429,000 · Destinator: current from ZAR 489,990

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec C-HR Destinator
Maximum Power 134 kW 120 kW @ 5000 rpm
Maximum Torque 190 Nm 250 Nm @ 2500-4000 rpm
Engine Size 1987 cc 1499 cc
Combined Fuel Economy 19.2 km/l 13.9 km/l
Ground Clearance 160 mm 214 mm
Boot / Load Bay 377 l 152 l
Airbags 7 6
Kerb Weight 1500 kg 1500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 7 seats
Warranty 3 5 years / unlimited km

= leads in this spec

Archived vehicles remain available for comparison. Verified specs stay visible; historical fields that were not source-confirmed are marked Not confirmed instead of being guessed.

The Bottom Line

C-HR has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Destinator remains close.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance C-HR +3 pts
Efficiency C-HR +24 pts
Safety C-HR +25 pts
Practicality Destinator +1 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Catalogue-index leader

C-HR

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency

Destinator

Strengths
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

C-HR

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Destinator

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec C-HR Destinator
Model Introduced Year 2023 2026
Generation Second generation on TNGA-C platform – hybrid-only in SA First-generation Destinator
Facelift History All-new second generation launched in SA in 2023 South African launch specification introduced in March 2026.
Facelift Launched Since 2023 Current specification
Tare Mass Kg 1500 kg -
Facelift Version Ending Not confirmed Current
Body Style Not confirmed SUV
Model Year Not confirmed 2026
Production Status Not confirmed active
Segment Not confirmed Medium seven-seat SUV
Vehicle Type Not confirmed Passenger vehicle
Spec C-HR Destinator
Length 4390 mm 4680 mm
Width 1796 mm 1840 mm
Height 1550 mm 1780 mm
Wheelbase 2640 mm 2815 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 160 mm 214 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 43 l 45 l
Boot/Cargo Space 377 l 152 l
Kerb Weight 1500 kg 1500 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1930 kg 2090 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 7 seats
Minimum Turning Radius 5.4 m 5.4 m
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not confirmed 185 mm
Payload Capacity Not confirmed 590 kg
Towing Capacity Not confirmed 0 kg
Number of Rows Not confirmed 3 rows
Doors Not confirmed 5 doors
Front Headroom Not confirmed 890 mm
Rear Headroom Not confirmed 850 mm
Front Legroom Not confirmed 1055 mm
Rear Legroom Not confirmed 620 mm

Source-backed Catalogue Index

A transparent specification index shown only when every vehicle clears the minimum comparable-data threshold.

Weighted / 100
Catalogue-index readout

C-HR leads by 8 points

C-HR has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Destinator remains close.

Index leader 68 /100
Lead 8 points
Data 83% source coverage
68
#1 Index leader

C-HR

83% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Ownership 43
Performance 53
Efficiency 78
Safety 98
Practicality 62
Ownership 43
Leads by 8 points
60
#2

Destinator

79% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 73 Check Performance 50
Performance 50
Efficiency 54
Safety 73
Practicality 63
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance C-HR +3 Efficiency C-HR +24 Safety C-HR +25 Practicality Destinator +1

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Catalogue-index leader

C-HR

Performance 53/100
Efficiency 78/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 62/100
Ownership 43/100

Destinator

Performance 50/100
Efficiency 54/100
Safety 73/100
Practicality 63/100

How to Read This Comparison

🏆 Toyota C-HR leads the catalogue index with 68 pts vs 60 pts for Destinator

In Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index, C-HR leads. However, Destinator may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.

Hagalu does not publish a guaranteed resale winner. Depreciation depends on age, mileage, condition, derivative, colour, supply and demand. Compare several current used-market listings and obtain trade-in valuations for equivalent examples before relying on a resale estimate.

Check the exact derivatives for drive type, ground clearance, tyres, approach and departure angles, wading depth and low-range gearing where officially disclosed. SUV styling or all-wheel drive alone does not prove that a vehicle is suitable for demanding off-road use.

Calculate each exact derivative using your monthly distance and a current fuel or electricity price, then add finance, insurance, scheduled service, tyres and licence costs. Hagalu does not claim a fixed monthly saving without those buyer-specific inputs.

It is worth more only when the exact price difference buys equipment, space, performance or ownership cover that matters to you. Compare like-for-like lifecycle states and derivatives; a current offer and a historical last-listed price are not directly equivalent.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

This C-HR and Destinator comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: C-HR 53 vs Destinator 50.

Efficiency index: C-HR 78 vs Destinator 54.

Safety-equipment index: C-HR 98 vs Destinator 73.

Practicality index: C-HR 62 vs Destinator 63.

Ownership-cover index: C-HR 43 vs Destinator not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.