Mercedes-Benz C-Class vs Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Mercedes-Benz C-Class in South Africa

Mercedes-Benz C-Class

C 43 Petrol Mild Hybrid 9-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 1,696,458 ex-showroom
⚡ 310 kW 🔧 500 Nm ⛽ 11.0 km/l
VS
Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab in South Africa

Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab

2.4L Bi-Turbo A/T Diesel 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 959,990 ex-showroom
⚡ 150 kW 🔧 470 Nm ⛽ 11.9 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mercedes-Benz C-Class vs Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab: the short answer

C-Class and Triton Double Cab are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Triton Double Cab starts ZAR 293,846 cheaper C-Class from ZAR 933,836 · Triton Double Cab from ZAR 639,990

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification C-Class Triton Double Cab
Maximum Power C-Class310 kW Triton Double Cab150 kW @ 3500 rpm
Maximum Torque C-Class500 Nm Triton Double Cab470 Nm @ 1500-2750 rpm
Engine Size C-Class1991 cc Triton Double Cab2442 cc
Combined Fuel Economy C-Class11.0 km/l Triton Double Cab11.9 km/l
Ground Clearance C-Class130 mm Triton Double Cab228 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Mercedes-Benz C-Class

C 43

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab

2.4L Bi-Turbo A/T

Hagalu editorial rating
4.3/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Hagalu Editorial Team ·

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

C-Class

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

Triton Double Cab

Strengths
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

C-Class

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Triton Double Cab

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec C-Class Triton Double Cab
Model Introduced Year 2026 2024
Generation Current South African C-Class generation represented by derivative C 43 Sixth-generation Triton
Facelift History Current-generation/facelift specification; derivative-specific South African configuration Next-Gen Triton launched in South Africa in November 2024; Bi-Turbo added in 2026.
Facelift Launched Since Current South African model cycle Current specification
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Sedan Double-cab pickup
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Current South African retail range active
Segment Premium sedan One-ton double-cab pickup
Vehicle Type Sedan Light commercial vehicle
Spec C-Class Triton Double Cab
Length 4751 mm 5360 mm
Width 1820 mm 1930 mm
Height 1437 mm 1815 mm
Wheelbase 2865 mm 3130 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 130 mm 228 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 120 mm 195 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 66 l 75 l
Boot/Cargo Space 455 l 1262 l
Kerb Weight 1700 kg 2035 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2000 kg 3020 kg
Payload Capacity 565 kg 985 kg
Towing Capacity 2000 kg 3500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.55 m 6.35 m
Front Headroom 960 mm 1000 mm
Rear Headroom 960 mm 972 mm
Front Legroom 900 mm 1059 mm
Rear Legroom 900 mm 857 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This C-Class and Triton Double Cab comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: C-Class 94 vs Triton Double Cab 75.

Efficiency index: C-Class 49 vs Triton Double Cab 47.

Safety-equipment index: C-Class 95 vs Triton Double Cab 95.

Practicality index: C-Class 62 vs Triton Double Cab 90.

Ownership-cover index: C-Class not separately scored vs Triton Double Cab not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Triton Double Cab leads by 1 points

C-Class and Triton Double Cab are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 78 /100
Lead 1 points
Data 83% source coverage
78
#1 Evidence leader

Triton Double Cab

83% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 95 Check Efficiency 47
Performance 75
Efficiency 47
Safety 95
Practicality 90
Leads by 1 points
77
#2

C-Class

83% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 95 Check Efficiency 49
Performance 94
Efficiency 49
Safety 95
Practicality 62
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance C-Class +19 Efficiency C-Class +2 Safety Level Practicality Triton Double Cab +28

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Triton Double Cab

Performance 75/100
Efficiency 47/100
Safety 95/100
Practicality 90/100

C-Class

Performance 94/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 95/100
Practicality 62/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab leads the specification evidence index with 78 pts vs 77 pts for C-Class

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Triton Double Cab leads. However, C-Class may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

C-Class
C-Class
VS
Terron 9
Terron 9
C-Class vs Terron 9 →
C-Class
C-Class
VS
Hunter K50 REEV
Hunter K50 REEV
C-Class vs Hunter K50 REEV →
C-Class
C-Class
VS
P500
P500
C-Class vs P500 →
C-Class
C-Class
VS
Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab
Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab
C-Class vs Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab →
C-Class
C-Class
VS
A-Class
A-Class
C-Class vs A-Class →
C-Class
C-Class
VS
GR86
GR86
C-Class vs GR86 →
Triton Double Cab
Triton Double Cab
VS
Terron 9
Terron 9
Triton Double Cab vs Terron 9 →
Triton Double Cab
Triton Double Cab
VS
Hunter K50 REEV
Hunter K50 REEV
Triton Double Cab vs Hunter K50 REEV →

C-Class vs Triton Double Cab questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.