Dongfeng BOX vs Mazda Mazda3

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Dongfeng BOX in South Africa

Dongfeng BOX

BOX E3 430 Electric Single-Speed Reduction Gear Current
ZAR 389,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 70 kW 🔧 290 Nm
VS
Mazda Mazda3 in South Africa

Mazda Mazda3

2.0 Astina Edition Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 629,700 ex-showroom
⚡ 121 kW 🔧 213 Nm ⛽ 15.9 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Dongfeng BOX vs Mazda Mazda3: the short answer

BOX and Mazda3 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

BOX starts ZAR 149,300 cheaper BOX from ZAR 349,000 · Mazda3 from ZAR 498,300

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification BOX Mazda3
Maximum Power BOX70 kW Mazda3121 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque BOX290 Nm Mazda3213 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Engine Size BOXNot Applicable Mazda31998 cc
Combined Fuel Economy BOXNot Applicable Mazda315.9 km/l
Ground Clearance BOX175 mm Mazda3140 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

BOX

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader

Mazda3

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

BOX

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Mazda3

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec BOX Mazda3
Model Introduced Year 2026 2019
Generation Current South African BOX generation Seventh-generation BP-series Mazda3 hatchback
Facelift History Current South African launch version; no local facelift announced The seventh-generation South African hatchback launched in 2019 and the current range has since been consolidated to Dynamic and Astina editions.
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version 2019
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Hatchback Hatchback
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active Active
Segment Urban Electric Hatchback C-segment hatchback
Vehicle Type Passenger Vehicle Hatchback
Tare Mass Kg - 1350 kg
Spec BOX Mazda3
Length 4020 mm 4460 mm
Width 1810 mm 1795 mm
Height 1570 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase 2663 mm 2725 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 175 mm 140 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 160 mm -
Fuel Tank Capacity 0 l 51 l
Boot/Cargo Space 326 l 295 l
Kerb Weight 1285 kg 1350 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2020 kg 1870 kg
Payload Capacity 500 kg 520 kg
Towing Capacity 500 kg 1000 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows -
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.2 m 5.3 m
Front Headroom 1000 mm -
Rear Headroom 970 mm -
Front Legroom 1040 mm 1075 mm
Rear Legroom 900 mm 891 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This BOX and Mazda3 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: BOX 52 vs Mazda3 50.

Efficiency index: BOX 31 vs Mazda3 61.

Safety-equipment index: BOX 88 vs Mazda3 96.

Practicality index: BOX 52 vs Mazda3 50.

Ownership-cover index: BOX not separately scored vs Mazda3 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Mazda3 leads by 7 points

BOX and Mazda3 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 64 /100
Lead 7 points
Data 77% source coverage
64
#1 Evidence leader

Mazda3

77% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 96 Check Performance 50
Performance 50
Efficiency 61
Safety 96
Practicality 50
Leads by 7 points
57
#2

BOX

83% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 88 Check Efficiency 31
Performance 52
Efficiency 31
Safety 88
Practicality 52
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance BOX +2 Efficiency Mazda3 +30 Safety Mazda3 +8 Practicality BOX +2

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Mazda3

Performance 50/100
Efficiency 61/100
Safety 96/100
Practicality 50/100

BOX

Performance 52/100
Efficiency 31/100
Safety 88/100
Practicality 52/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mazda Mazda3 leads the specification evidence index with 64 pts vs 57 pts for BOX

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Mazda3 leads. However, BOX may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

BOX
BOX
VS
Fit
Fit
BOX vs Fit →
BOX
BOX
VS
Swift Sport
Swift Sport
BOX vs Swift Sport →
BOX
BOX
VS
Polo
Polo
BOX vs Polo →
BOX
BOX
VS
Corolla Hatch
Corolla Hatch
BOX vs Corolla Hatch →
BOX
BOX
VS
DOLPHIN SURF
DOLPHIN SURF
BOX vs DOLPHIN SURF →
BOX
BOX
VS
E2
E2
BOX vs E2 →
Mazda3
Mazda3
VS
Fit
Fit
Mazda3 vs Fit →
Mazda3
Mazda3
VS
Swift Sport
Swift Sport
Mazda3 vs Swift Sport →

BOX vs Mazda3 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.