Honda Amaze vs Volkswagen T-Roc

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Honda Amaze in South Africa

Honda Amaze

1.2 Comfort CVT Petrol CVT Current
ZAR 289,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 66 kW 🔧 110 Nm ⛽ 18.2 km/l
VS
Volkswagen T-Roc in South Africa

Volkswagen T-Roc

2.0 TSI 140kW 4Motion R-Line DSG Petrol 7-Speed DCT Current
ZAR 760,100 ex-showroom
⚡ 140 kW 🔧 320 Nm ⛽ 15.9 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Honda Amaze vs Volkswagen T-Roc: the short answer

T-Roc holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Amaze.

Amaze starts ZAR 394,000 cheaper Amaze from ZAR 254,900 · T-Roc from ZAR 648,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Amaze T-Roc
Maximum Power Amaze66 kW T-Roc140 kW
Maximum Torque Amaze110 Nm T-Roc320 Nm
Engine Size Amaze1199 cc T-Roc2000 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Amaze18.2 km/l T-Roc15.9 km/l
Ground Clearance Amaze170 mm T-Roc168 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Honda Amaze

1.2 Comfort CVT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Volkswagen T-Roc

2.0 TSI 140kW 4Motion R-Line DSG

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Amaze

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

T-Roc

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Amaze

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

T-Roc

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Amaze T-Roc
Model Introduced Year 2018 2021
Generation Based on Honda’s compact car platform optimized for affordability, efficiency, and ease of use Current first-generation T-Roc remains on sale while the second generation is prepared for South Africa
Facelift History Introduced in South Africa as a practical entry sedan with minor updates over time in features and safety Volkswagen has confirmed the all-new second-generation T-Roc for the second half of 2026; local derivatives and prices are still pending
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version Volkswagen has confirmed the all-new second-generation T-Roc for the second half of 2026; local derivatives and prices are still pending
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Sedan SUV
Color Note White, Silver, Grey, Red, Blue White, Black, Silver, Grey, Blue, Red, Orange
Dealer Stock Note Top grade in the South Africa lineup Top grade in the South Africa lineup
Model Year 2026 Current
Production Status active published
Segment Sedan SUV
Tare Mass Kg 954 kg 1400 kg
Vehicle Type Sedan SUV
Drivetrain Note - 4x4 configuration for the local line-up
Spec Amaze T-Roc
Length 3995 mm 4234 mm
Width 1695 mm 1819 mm
Height 1498 mm 1573 mm
Wheelbase 2470 mm 2593 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 170 mm 168 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 170 mm -
Fuel Tank Capacity 35 l 55 l
Boot/Cargo Space 420 l 392 l
Kerb Weight 954 kg 1400 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1380 kg 2020 kg
Payload Capacity 426 kg -
Towing Capacity 900 kg 1200 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows -
Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 4.9 m 5.4 m
Front Headroom 990 mm -
Rear Headroom 920 mm -
Front Legroom 770 mm -
Rear Legroom 920 mm -

In depth: how these cars differ

This Amaze and T-Roc comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Amaze 26 vs T-Roc 64.

Efficiency index: Amaze 69 vs T-Roc 61.

Safety-equipment index: Amaze 50 vs T-Roc 99.

Practicality index: Amaze 56 vs T-Roc 58.

Ownership-cover index: Amaze 43 vs T-Roc 43.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

T-Roc leads by 19 points

T-Roc holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Amaze.

Evidence leader 67 /100
Lead 19 points
Data 89% source coverage
67
#1 Evidence leader

T-Roc

89% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 99 Check Ownership 43
Performance 64
Efficiency 61
Safety 99
Practicality 58
Ownership 43
Leads by 19 points
48
#2

Amaze

86% source coverage 0 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 69 Check Performance 26
Performance 26
Efficiency 69
Safety 50
Practicality 56
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance T-Roc +38 Efficiency Amaze +8 Safety T-Roc +49 Practicality T-Roc +2 Ownership Level

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

T-Roc

Performance 64/100
Efficiency 61/100
Safety 99/100
Practicality 58/100
Ownership 43/100

Amaze

Performance 26/100
Efficiency 69/100
Safety 50/100
Practicality 56/100
Ownership 43/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Volkswagen T-Roc leads the specification evidence index with 67 pts vs 48 pts for Amaze

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, T-Roc leads. However, Amaze may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

Amaze
Amaze
VS
Outlander Sport
Outlander Sport
Amaze vs Outlander Sport →
Amaze
Amaze
VS
ATTO 2 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i
Amaze vs ATTO 2 DM-i →
Amaze
Amaze
VS
X70 Plus
X70 Plus
Amaze vs X70 Plus →
Amaze
Amaze
VS
Jimny
Jimny
Amaze vs Jimny →
Amaze
Amaze
VS
CX-3
CX-3
Amaze vs CX-3 →
Amaze
Amaze
VS
Jimny 5-Door
Jimny 5-Door
Amaze vs Jimny 5-Door →
T-Roc
T-Roc
VS
Outlander Sport
Outlander Sport
T-Roc vs Outlander Sport →
T-Roc
T-Roc
VS
ATTO 2 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i
T-Roc vs ATTO 2 DM-i →

Amaze vs T-Roc questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.