Honda Amaze vs Rolls-Royce Phantom

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Honda Amaze in South Africa

Honda Amaze

1.2 Comfort CVT Petrol CVT Current
ZAR 289,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 66 kW 🔧 110 Nm ⛽ 18.2 km/l
VS
Rolls-Royce Phantom in South Africa

Rolls-Royce Phantom

Phantom Series II Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
Price on request
⚡ 420 kW 🔧 900 Nm ⛽ 6.29 km/l
Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Honda Amaze vs Rolls-Royce Phantom: the short answer

Phantom has a large lead in Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index over Amaze.

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Amaze Phantom
Maximum Power Amaze66 kW Phantom420 kW @ 5000 rpm
Maximum Torque Amaze110 Nm Phantom900 Nm @ 1700 rpm
Engine Size Amaze1199 cc Phantom6749 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Amaze18.2 km/l Phantom6.29 km/l
Ground Clearance Amaze170 mm Phantom136 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Amaze

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

Phantom

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Amaze

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Phantom

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Amaze Phantom
Model Introduced Year 2018 2018
Generation Based on Honda’s compact car platform optimized for affordability, efficiency, and ease of use Eighth-generation Phantom in standard-wheelbase Series II form
Facelift History Introduced in South Africa as a practical entry sedan with minor updates over time in features and safety The eighth-generation Phantom was presented globally in 2017, introduced in South Africa in 2018 and received its light-touch Series II evolution in 2022
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version 2022
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Sedan Four-door luxury saloon
Color Note White, Silver, Grey, Red, Blue -
Dealer Stock Note Top grade in the South Africa lineup -
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Sedan Full-size super-luxury saloon
Tare Mass Kg 954 kg -
Vehicle Type Sedan Internal-combustion passenger car
Spec Amaze Phantom
Length 3995 mm 5762 mm
Width 1695 mm 2018 mm
Height 1498 mm 1646 mm
Wheelbase 2470 mm 3552 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 170 mm 136 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 170 mm 136 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 35 l 90 l
Boot/Cargo Space 420 l 530 l
Kerb Weight 954 kg 2560 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1380 kg 3235 kg
Payload Capacity 426 kg 675 kg
Towing Capacity 900 kg 0 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 4.9 m 6.55 m
Front Headroom 990 mm 1046 mm
Rear Headroom 920 mm 978 mm
Front Legroom 770 mm 1041 mm
Rear Legroom 920 mm 1105 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Amaze and Phantom comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Amaze 26 vs Phantom 96.

Efficiency index: Amaze 69 vs Phantom 29.

Safety-equipment index: Amaze 50 vs Phantom 95.

Practicality index: Amaze 56 vs Phantom 67.

Ownership-cover index: Amaze 43 vs Phantom not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Phantom leads by 27 points

Phantom has a large lead in Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index over Amaze.

Evidence leader 75 /100
Lead 27 points
Data 79% source coverage
75
#1 Evidence leader

Phantom

79% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Performance 96 Check Efficiency 29
Performance 96
Efficiency 29
Safety 95
Practicality 67
Leads by 27 points
48
#2

Amaze

86% source coverage 0 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 69 Check Performance 26
Performance 26
Efficiency 69
Safety 50
Practicality 56
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Phantom +70 Efficiency Amaze +40 Safety Phantom +45 Practicality Phantom +11

Large difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Phantom

Performance 96/100
Efficiency 29/100
Safety 95/100
Practicality 67/100

Amaze

Performance 26/100
Efficiency 69/100
Safety 50/100
Practicality 56/100
Ownership 43/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Rolls-Royce Phantom leads the specification evidence index with 75 pts vs 48 pts for Amaze

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Phantom leads. However, Amaze may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Amaze vs Phantom questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.