Honda Amaze vs Rolls-Royce Ghost Extended

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Honda Amaze in South Africa

Honda Amaze

1.2 Comfort CVT Petrol CVT Current
ZAR 289,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 66 kW 🔧 110 Nm ⛽ 18.2 km/l
VS
Rolls-Royce Ghost Extended in South Africa

Rolls-Royce Ghost Extended

Ghost Extended Series II Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
Price on request
⚡ 420 kW 🔧 850 Nm ⛽ 6.33 km/l
Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Honda Amaze vs Rolls-Royce Ghost Extended: the short answer

Ghost Extended has a large lead in Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index over Amaze.

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Amaze Ghost Extended
Maximum Power Amaze66 kW Ghost Extended420 kW @ 5000 rpm
Maximum Torque Amaze110 Nm Ghost Extended850 Nm @ 1600 rpm
Engine Size Amaze1199 cc Ghost Extended6749 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Amaze18.2 km/l Ghost Extended6.33 km/l
Ground Clearance Amaze170 mm Ghost Extended118 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Amaze

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

Ghost Extended

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Amaze

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Ghost Extended

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Amaze Ghost Extended
Model Introduced Year 2018 -
Generation Based on Honda’s compact car platform optimized for affordability, efficiency, and ease of use Second-generation Ghost Extended in long-wheelbase Series II form
Facelift History Introduced in South Africa as a practical entry sedan with minor updates over time in features and safety Ghost Extended joined the second-generation Ghost family globally in 2020 and evolved into Ghost Extended Series II in October 2024; its exact South African introduction year remains unverified
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version 2024
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Sedan Extended-wheelbase four-door luxury saloon
Color Note White, Silver, Grey, Red, Blue -
Dealer Stock Note Top grade in the South Africa lineup -
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Sedan Extended-wheelbase full-size super-luxury saloon
Tare Mass Kg 954 kg -
Vehicle Type Sedan Internal-combustion passenger car
Spec Amaze Ghost Extended
Length 3995 mm 5715 mm
Width 1695 mm 1998 mm
Height 1498 mm 1574 mm
Wheelbase 2470 mm 3465 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 170 mm 118 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 170 mm 118 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 35 l 90 l
Boot/Cargo Space 420 l 500 l
Kerb Weight 954 kg 2545 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1380 kg 3130 kg
Payload Capacity 426 kg 585 kg
Towing Capacity 900 kg 0 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 4.9 m 6.8 m
Front Headroom 990 mm 1030 mm
Rear Headroom 920 mm 990 mm
Front Legroom 770 mm 1060 mm
Rear Legroom 920 mm 1245 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Amaze and Ghost Extended comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Amaze 26 vs Ghost Extended 100.

Efficiency index: Amaze 69 vs Ghost Extended 29.

Safety-equipment index: Amaze 50 vs Ghost Extended 99.

Practicality index: Amaze 56 vs Ghost Extended 63.

Ownership-cover index: Amaze 43 vs Ghost Extended not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Ghost Extended leads by 28 points

Ghost Extended has a large lead in Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index over Amaze.

Evidence leader 76 /100
Lead 28 points
Data 79% source coverage
76
#1 Evidence leader

Ghost Extended

79% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Performance 100 Check Efficiency 29
Performance 100
Efficiency 29
Safety 99
Practicality 63
Leads by 28 points
48
#2

Amaze

86% source coverage 0 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 69 Check Performance 26
Performance 26
Efficiency 69
Safety 50
Practicality 56
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Ghost Extended +74 Efficiency Amaze +40 Safety Ghost Extended +49 Practicality Ghost Extended +7

Large difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Ghost Extended

Performance 100/100
Efficiency 29/100
Safety 99/100
Practicality 63/100

Amaze

Performance 26/100
Efficiency 69/100
Safety 50/100
Practicality 56/100
Ownership 43/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Rolls-Royce Ghost Extended leads the specification evidence index with 76 pts vs 48 pts for Amaze

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Ghost Extended leads. However, Amaze may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Amaze vs Ghost Extended questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.