Volkswagen Amarok vs Volkswagen T-Roc

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Volkswagen Amarok in South Africa

Volkswagen Amarok

3.0 V6 TDI Double Cab Aventura 4Motion AT Diesel Automatic
ZAR 1,252,200 ex-showroom
⚡ 125 kW (168 hp)
🔧 400 Nm
⛽ 12.8 km/l
VS
Volkswagen T-Roc in South Africa

Volkswagen T-Roc

2.0 TSI 4Motion R-Line DSG Petrol Automatic
ZAR 760,100 ex-showroom
⚡ 110 kW (148 hp)
🔧 250 Nm
⛽ 14.0 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Amarok
Mileage T-Roc
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

T-Roc

61
/ 100
+4
pts
#2

Amarok

57
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Both Amarok and T-Roc are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Amarok +3 pts
Efficiency T-Roc +1 pts
Safety T-Roc +2 pts
Practicality T-Roc +4 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

T-Roc

Performance 10/20
Efficiency 8/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 11/20
Ownership 12/20

Amarok

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 7/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

Amarok

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: Highway Driving
🏆 Overall Winner

T-Roc

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best For: Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

Amarok

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power

T-Roc

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Amarok T-Roc
Ground Clearance 192 168
Wheelbase 3097 2630
Length 5254 4234
Width 1944 1819
Height 1834 1573
Kerb Weight 2095 1400
Gross Vehicle Weight 3150 1880
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 0 392
Towing Capacity 3500 1200
Front Track Width - 1569
Rear Track Width - 1546
Turning Radius - 5.4
Specification Amarok T-Roc
Engine 2.0L TDI Turbo Diesel 1.4L TSI Turbocharged Petrol
Engine Type Inline 4 Turbocharged Intercooled Inline 4 Cylinder Turbocharged
Displacement 1968 1395
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 125 110
Torque 400 250
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Direct Injection
Turbocharger Twin Turbo Single Turbo
Top Speed 180 203
0-100 km/h 10.5 9.1
Power @ RPM - 5000-6000 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 1500-3500 rpm
Compression Ratio - 10.5:1
Engine Position - Front Transverse

Final Verdict

🏆 Volkswagen T-Roc wins with 61 pts vs 57 pts for Amarok

In structured scoring, T-Roc emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Amarok may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, T-Roc performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Amarok scores 7 while T-Roc scores 8 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Amarok scores 18 and T-Roc scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Amarok scores 12 versus T-Roc scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Amarok 7 and T-Roc 11, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Amarok scoring 13 compared to T-Roc scoring 10, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest T-Roc may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. T-Roc performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives T-Roc the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Amarok and T-Roc in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Amarok scores 13 vs 10.

Efficiency: Amarok scores 7 vs 8.

Safety: Amarok scores 18 vs 20.

Practicality: Amarok scores 7 vs 11.

Ownership: Amarok scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives T-Roc the advantage in this comparison.