Volkswagen Amarok vs Volkswagen Polo

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Volkswagen Amarok in South Africa

Volkswagen Amarok

3.0 V6 TDI Double Cab Aventura 4Motion AT Diesel Automatic
ZAR 1,252,200 ex-showroom
⚡ 125 kW (168 hp)
🔧 400 Nm
⛽ 12.8 km/l
VS
Volkswagen Polo in South Africa

Volkswagen Polo

1.4 TSI GTI DSG Petrol Automatic
ZAR 519,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 147 kW (197 hp)
🔧 250 Nm
⛽ 16.4 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Amarok
Mileage Polo
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Polo

63
/ 100
+6
pts
#2

Amarok

57
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Both Amarok and Polo are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Amarok +1 pts
Efficiency Polo +2 pts
Safety Polo +2 pts
Practicality Polo +3 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Polo

Performance 12/20
Efficiency 9/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 10/20
Ownership 12/20

Amarok

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 7/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

Amarok

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: Highway Driving
🏆 Overall Winner

Polo

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best For: Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

Amarok

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power

Polo

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Amarok Polo
Ground Clearance 192 151
Wheelbase 3097 2564
Length 5254 4053
Width 1944 1751
Height 1834 1461
Kerb Weight 2095 1105
Gross Vehicle Weight 3150 1530
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 0 351
Towing Capacity 3500 1000
Front Track Width - 1522
Rear Track Width - 1497
Turning Radius - 5.1
Specification Amarok Polo
Engine 2.0L TDI Turbo Diesel 1.4L TSI Turbocharged Petrol (GTI)
Engine Type Inline 4 Turbocharged Intercooled Inline 3 Cylinder Turbocharged
Displacement 1968 1395
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 125 147
Torque 400 250
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Direct Injection
Turbocharger Twin Turbo Single Turbo
Top Speed 180 230
0-100 km/h 10.5 6.7
Power @ RPM - 5000-5500 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 2000-3500 rpm
Compression Ratio - 10.5:1
Engine Position - Front Transverse

Final Verdict

🏆 Volkswagen Polo wins with 63 pts vs 57 pts for Amarok

In structured scoring, Polo emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Amarok may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Polo performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Amarok scores 7 while Polo scores 9 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Amarok scores 18 and Polo scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Amarok scores 12 versus Polo scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Amarok 7 and Polo 10, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Amarok scoring 13 compared to Polo scoring 12, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Polo may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Polo performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Polo the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Amarok and Polo in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Amarok scores 13 vs 12.

Efficiency: Amarok scores 7 vs 9.

Safety: Amarok scores 18 vs 20.

Practicality: Amarok scores 7 vs 10.

Ownership: Amarok scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Polo the advantage in this comparison.