Volkswagen Amarok vs Toyota Land Cruiser 76

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Volkswagen Amarok in South Africa

Volkswagen Amarok

DC Aventura 3.0 V6 TDI 4Motion 10AT Diesel Current
ZAR 1,259,700 ex-showroom
⚡ 184 kW 🔧 600 Nm ⛽ 14.5 km/l
VS
Toyota Land Cruiser 76 in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser 76

4.0 V6 Station Wagon AT Petrol 4-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 1,065,300 ex-showroom
⚡ 202 kW 🔧 381 Nm ⛽ 13 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Volkswagen Amarok vs Toyota Land Cruiser 76: the short answer

Amarok holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Land Cruiser 76.

Amarok starts ZAR 383,200 cheaper Amarok from ZAR 596,800 · Land Cruiser 76 from ZAR 980,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Amarok Land Cruiser 76
Maximum Power Amarok184 kW Land Cruiser 76202 kW
Maximum Torque Amarok600 Nm Land Cruiser 76381 Nm
Engine Size Amarok2993 cc Land Cruiser 763956 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Amarok14.5 km/l Land Cruiser 7613 km/l
Ground Clearance Amarok237 mm Land Cruiser 76230 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Volkswagen Amarok

DC Aventura 3.0 V6 TDI 4Motion 10AT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Toyota Land Cruiser 76

4.0 V6 Station Wagon AT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

Amarok

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency

Land Cruiser 76

Strengths
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Amarok

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Land Cruiser 76

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Amarok Land Cruiser 76
Model Introduced Year 2010 1984
Generation Latest Amarok generation brings improved performance and modern safety features 70 Series – one of the world's longest-running vehicle nameplates
Facelift History Major redesign in 2023 introducing new platform, updated engines, and advanced tech Continuous mechanical updates while retaining core body-on-frame design. Minor updates in 2007, 2014, 2021
Facelift Launched Since 2023 2021
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Pickup SUV
Body Type Cab Pickup -
Color Note White, Silver, Black, Grey, Blue, Red White, Beige
Dealer Stock Note Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup Top grade in the South Africa lineup
Drivetrain Note 4x4 configuration for the local line-up -
Model Year Current 2026
Production Status published active
Segment Pickup SUV
Tare Mass Kg 2023 kg 2100 kg
Vehicle Type Pickup SUV
Spec Amarok Land Cruiser 76
Length 5350 mm 4890 mm
Width 1910 mm 1885 mm
Height 1884 mm 1970 mm
Wheelbase 3270 mm 2730 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 237 mm 230 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 l 87 l
Kerb Weight 2023 kg 2100 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 3190 kg 3300 kg
Payload Capacity 1167 kg 1200 kg
Towing Capacity 3500 kg 3500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 8 seats
Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 12.93 m 6 m
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) - 125 mm
Boot/Cargo Space - 909 l
Number of Rows - 3 rows
Front Headroom - 993 mm
Rear Headroom - 954 mm
Front Legroom - 1040 mm
Rear Legroom - 887 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Amarok and Land Cruiser 76 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Amarok 91 vs Land Cruiser 76 77.

Efficiency index: Amarok 57 vs Land Cruiser 76 49.

Safety-equipment index: Amarok 82 vs Land Cruiser 76 50.

Practicality index: Amarok 87 vs Land Cruiser 76 98.

Ownership-cover index: Amarok not separately scored vs Land Cruiser 76 43.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Amarok leads by 15 points

Amarok holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Land Cruiser 76.

Evidence leader 81 /100
Lead 15 points
Data 64% source coverage
81
#1 Evidence leader

Amarok

64% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Performance 91 Check Efficiency 57
Performance 91
Efficiency 57
Safety 82
Practicality 87
Leads by 15 points
66
#2

Land Cruiser 76

86% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Practicality 98 Check Ownership 43
Performance 77
Efficiency 49
Safety 50
Practicality 98
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Amarok +14 Efficiency Amarok +8 Safety Amarok +32 Practicality Land Cruiser 76 +11

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Amarok

Performance 91/100
Efficiency 57/100
Safety 82/100
Practicality 87/100

Land Cruiser 76

Performance 77/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 50/100
Practicality 98/100
Ownership 43/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Volkswagen Amarok leads the specification evidence index with 81 pts vs 66 pts for Land Cruiser 76

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Amarok leads. However, Land Cruiser 76 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Amarok vs Land Cruiser 76 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.