Changan Alsvin vs Mitsubishi Outlander Sport

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Changan Alsvin in South Africa

Changan Alsvin

1.5 AT CE Petrol 5-Speed DCT Current
ZAR 289,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 78 kW 🔧 145 Nm ⛽ 14.49 km/l
VS
Mitsubishi Outlander Sport in South Africa

Mitsubishi Outlander Sport

Exceed 1.5L CVT Petrol CVT Current
ZAR 499,990 ex-showroom
⚡ 77 kW 🔧 141 Nm ⛽ 16.1 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Changan Alsvin vs Mitsubishi Outlander Sport: the short answer

Outlander Sport has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Alsvin remains close.

Alsvin starts ZAR 200,090 cheaper Alsvin from ZAR 249,900 · Outlander Sport from ZAR 449,990

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Alsvin Outlander Sport
Maximum Power Alsvin78 kW Outlander Sport77 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque Alsvin145 Nm Outlander Sport141 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Engine Size Alsvin1500 cc Outlander Sport1499 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Alsvin14.49 km/l Outlander Sport16.1 km/l
Ground Clearance Alsvin150 mm Outlander Sport193 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Changan Alsvin

1.5 AT CE

Hagalu editorial rating
3.9/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Mitsubishi Outlander Sport

Exceed 1.5L CVT

Hagalu editorial rating
4.3/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Alsvin

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance
Specification evidence leader

Outlander Sport

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Alsvin

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures

Outlander Sport

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Alsvin Outlander Sport
Model Introduced Year 2025 2025
Generation Current South African Alsvin generation launched with two locally named derivatives in 2025. First South African Outlander Sport generation, Mitsubishi Xforce architecture
Facelift History No South African facelift has been announced since the current range entered local retail sale. Introduced locally in January 2025 and replaced ASX.
Facelift Launched Since Not Applicable Current specification
Facelift Version Ending Not Applicable Current
Body Style Sedan SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Compact sedan Compact SUV
Vehicle Type Passenger car Passenger vehicle
Spec Alsvin Outlander Sport
Length 4390 mm 4390 mm
Width 1725 mm 1810 mm
Height 1490 mm 1660 mm
Wheelbase 2535 mm 2650 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 150 mm 193 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed 195 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 l 42 l
Boot/Cargo Space 390 l 480 l
Kerb Weight 1069 kg 1250 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1470 kg 1730 kg
Payload Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 480 kg
Towing Capacity 705 kg 0 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.5 m 5.2 m
Front Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 950 mm
Rear Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 880 mm
Front Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 1050 mm
Rear Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 370 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Alsvin and Outlander Sport comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Alsvin 35 vs Outlander Sport 30.

Efficiency index: Alsvin 56 vs Outlander Sport 62.

Safety-equipment index: Alsvin 32 vs Outlander Sport 73.

Practicality index: Alsvin 54 vs Outlander Sport 67.

Ownership-cover index: Alsvin not separately scored vs Outlander Sport not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Outlander Sport leads by 14 points

Outlander Sport has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Alsvin remains close.

Evidence leader 57 /100
Lead 14 points
Data 79% source coverage
57
#1 Evidence leader

Outlander Sport

79% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 73 Check Performance 30
Performance 30
Efficiency 62
Safety 73
Practicality 67
Leads by 14 points
43
#2

Alsvin

66% source coverage 0 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 56 Check Safety 32
Performance 35
Efficiency 56
Safety 32
Practicality 54
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Alsvin +5 Efficiency Outlander Sport +6 Safety Outlander Sport +41 Practicality Outlander Sport +13

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Outlander Sport

Performance 30/100
Efficiency 62/100
Safety 73/100
Practicality 67/100

Alsvin

Performance 35/100
Efficiency 56/100
Safety 32/100
Practicality 54/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mitsubishi Outlander Sport leads the specification evidence index with 57 pts vs 43 pts for Alsvin

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Outlander Sport leads. However, Alsvin may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Alsvin vs Outlander Sport questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.