Changan Alsvin vs Toyota GR Supra

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Changan Alsvin in South Africa

Changan Alsvin

1.5 AT CE Petrol 5-Speed DCT Current
ZAR 289,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 78 kW 🔧 145 Nm ⛽ 14.49 km/l
VS
Toyota GR Supra in South Africa

Toyota GR Supra

3.0T Manual Petrol 6-Speed Manual Current
ZAR 1,561,600 ex-showroom
⚡ 285 kW 🔧 500 Nm ⛽ 12 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Changan Alsvin vs Toyota GR Supra: the short answer

GR Supra holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Alsvin.

Alsvin starts ZAR 1,274,900 cheaper Alsvin from ZAR 249,900 · GR Supra from ZAR 1,524,800

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Alsvin GR Supra
Maximum Power Alsvin78 kW GR Supra285 kW
Maximum Torque Alsvin145 Nm GR Supra500 Nm
Engine Size Alsvin1500 cc GR Supra2998 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Alsvin14.49 km/l GR Supra12 km/l
Ground Clearance Alsvin150 mm GR Supra117 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Changan Alsvin

1.5 AT CE

Hagalu editorial rating
3.9/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Hagalu Editorial Team ·

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Toyota GR Supra

3.0T Manual

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Alsvin

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader

GR Supra

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

Which One's Right for You?

Alsvin

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

GR Supra

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Alsvin GR Supra
Model Introduced Year 2025 2021
Generation Current South African Alsvin generation launched with two locally named derivatives in 2025. A90 fifth generation – co-developed with BMW on the CLAR platform
Facelift History No South African facelift has been announced since the current range entered local retail sale. Manual gearbox and power upgrade (280 kW→285 kW) in 2023
Facelift Launched Since Not Applicable 2023
Facelift Version Ending Not Applicable Current
Body Style Sedan Sedan
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Compact sedan Sedan
Vehicle Type Passenger car Sedan
Color Note - Matte White, Nitro Yellow, Renaissance Red, Gravure Grey, Tungsten Silver, Black
Dealer Stock Note - Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup
Tare Mass Kg - 1545 kg
Spec Alsvin GR Supra
Length 4390 mm 4380 mm
Width 1725 mm 1865 mm
Height 1490 mm 1294 mm
Wheelbase 2535 mm 2470 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 150 mm 117 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed 125 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 l 52 l
Boot/Cargo Space 390 l 290 l
Kerb Weight 1069 kg 1545 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1470 kg 1870 kg
Payload Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 325 kg
Towing Capacity 705 kg 1600 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 1 rows
Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.5 m 6.3 m
Front Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 995 mm
Rear Headroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Applicable
Front Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 1040 mm
Rear Legroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Applicable

In depth: how these cars differ

This Alsvin and GR Supra comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Alsvin 35 vs GR Supra 94.

Efficiency index: Alsvin 56 vs GR Supra 47.

Safety-equipment index: Alsvin 32 vs GR Supra 98.

Practicality index: Alsvin 54 vs GR Supra 40.

Ownership-cover index: Alsvin not separately scored vs GR Supra 43.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

GR Supra leads by 24 points

GR Supra holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Alsvin.

Evidence leader 67 /100
Lead 24 points
Data 90% source coverage
67
#1 Evidence leader

GR Supra

90% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Practicality 40
Performance 94
Efficiency 47
Safety 98
Practicality 40
Ownership 43
Leads by 24 points
43
#2

Alsvin

66% source coverage 0 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 56 Check Safety 32
Performance 35
Efficiency 56
Safety 32
Practicality 54
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance GR Supra +59 Efficiency Alsvin +9 Safety GR Supra +66 Practicality Alsvin +14

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

GR Supra

Performance 94/100
Efficiency 47/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 40/100
Ownership 43/100

Alsvin

Performance 35/100
Efficiency 56/100
Safety 32/100
Practicality 54/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Toyota GR Supra leads the specification evidence index with 67 pts vs 43 pts for Alsvin

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, GR Supra leads. However, Alsvin may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

Alsvin
Alsvin
VS
3 Series
3 Series
Alsvin vs 3 Series →
Alsvin
Alsvin
VS
ES
ES
Alsvin vs ES →
Alsvin
Alsvin
VS
C-Class
C-Class
Alsvin vs C-Class →
Alsvin
Alsvin
VS
CLA Hybrid
CLA HybridUpcoming
Alsvin vs CLA Hybrid →
Alsvin
Alsvin
VS
A-Class
A-Class
Alsvin vs A-Class →
Alsvin
Alsvin
VS
4 Series Gran Coupé
4 Series Gran Coupé
Alsvin vs 4 Series Gran Coupé →
GR Supra
GR Supra
VS
3 Series
3 Series
GR Supra vs 3 Series →
GR Supra
GR Supra
VS
ES
ES
GR Supra vs ES →

Alsvin vs GR Supra questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.