Mazda All-New CX-5 vs Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace Discontinued model
Mazda All-New CX-5 in South Africa

Mazda All-New CX-5

2.5 Active Edition Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Upcoming
ZAR 570,000 last listed
Upcoming in South Africa Confirmed launch information and specifications remain visible while final availability is pending.
⚡ 132 kW 🔧 240 Nm ⛽ 13.2 km/l
VS
Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace in South Africa

Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace

2.0 TSI 162kW R-Line 4Motion DSG Petrol 7-Speed DCT Discontinued model
ZAR 934,700 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 162 kW 🔧 350 Nm ⛽ 12.5 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mazda All-New CX-5 vs Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace: the short answer

All-New CX-5 and Tiguan Allspace are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Recorded price context All-New CX-5: announced from ZAR 570,000 · Tiguan Allspace: last listed from ZAR 701,600

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification All-New CX-5 Tiguan Allspace
Maximum Power All-New CX-5132 kW @ 6000 rpm Tiguan Allspace162 kW
Maximum Torque All-New CX-5240 Nm @ 4000 rpm Tiguan Allspace350 Nm
Engine Size All-New CX-52488 cc Tiguan Allspace1984 cc
Combined Fuel Economy All-New CX-513.2 km/l Tiguan Allspace12.5 km/l
Ground Clearance All-New CX-5205 mm Tiguan Allspace198 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Evidence for Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace 2.0 TSI 162kW R-Line 4Motion DSG

Source type: Hagalu catalogue record

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

All-New CX-5

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

Tiguan Allspace

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance

Which One's Right for You?

All-New CX-5

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Tiguan Allspace

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec All-New CX-5 Tiguan Allspace
Model Introduced Year 2026 2017
Generation Third-generation Mazda CX-5 for South Africa Second generation Tiguan Allspace (AD/AN) on MQB platform
Facelift History All-new third-generation model; no facelift applies Mid-cycle facelift in 2021 with IQ.Drive safety tech and updated infotainment
Facelift Launched Since 2026 2021
Facelift Version Ending Current Not confirmed
Body Style SUV Not confirmed
Model Year 2026 Not confirmed
Production Status upcoming Not confirmed
Segment Medium SUV Not confirmed
Vehicle Type Passenger Vehicle Not confirmed
Tare Mass Kg - 1640 kg
Spec All-New CX-5 Tiguan Allspace
Length 4690 mm 4703 mm
Width 1860 mm 1839 mm
Height 1695 mm 1674 mm
Wheelbase 2815 mm 2790 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 205 mm 198 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 200 mm Not confirmed
Fuel Tank Capacity 56 l 57 l
Boot/Cargo Space 466 l 230 l
Kerb Weight 1629 kg 1640 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2190 kg 2220 kg
Payload Capacity 561 kg Not confirmed
Towing Capacity 1500 kg 2000 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows Not confirmed
Doors 5 doors Not confirmed
Minimum Turning Radius 6.0 m 5.5 m
Front Headroom 1007 mm Not confirmed
Rear Headroom 1020 mm Not confirmed
Front Legroom 1058 mm Not confirmed
Rear Legroom 1012 mm Not confirmed

In depth: how these cars differ

This All-New CX-5 and Tiguan Allspace comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: All-New CX-5 52 vs Tiguan Allspace 75.

Efficiency index: All-New CX-5 52 vs Tiguan Allspace 49.

Safety-equipment index: All-New CX-5 98 vs Tiguan Allspace 98.

Practicality index: All-New CX-5 66 vs Tiguan Allspace 66.

Ownership-cover index: All-New CX-5 not separately scored vs Tiguan Allspace not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Tiguan Allspace leads by 5 points

All-New CX-5 and Tiguan Allspace are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 73 /100
Lead 5 points
Data 78% source coverage
73
#1 Evidence leader

Tiguan Allspace

78% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Efficiency 49
Performance 75
Efficiency 49
Safety 98
Practicality 66
Leads by 5 points
68
#2

All-New CX-5

82% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Performance 52
Performance 52
Efficiency 52
Safety 98
Practicality 66
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Tiguan Allspace +23 Efficiency All-New CX-5 +3 Safety Level Practicality Level

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Tiguan Allspace

Performance 75/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 66/100

All-New CX-5

Performance 52/100
Efficiency 52/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 66/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace leads the specification evidence index with 73 pts vs 68 pts for All-New CX-5

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Tiguan Allspace leads. However, All-New CX-5 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

All-New CX-5 vs Tiguan Allspace questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.