iCAUR 03T vs Mazda All-New CX-5

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

iCAUR 03T in South Africa

iCAUR 03T

2WD Electric Single-Speed Reduction Gear Current
ZAR 639,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 135 kW 🔧 220 Nm ⛽ Not applicable — electric consumption measured in kWh/100 km km/l
VS
Mazda All-New CX-5 in South Africa

Mazda All-New CX-5

2.5 Active Edition Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Upcoming
ZAR 570,000 last listed
Upcoming in South Africa Confirmed launch information and specifications remain visible while final availability is pending.
⚡ 132 kW 🔧 240 Nm ⛽ 13.2 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

iCAUR 03T vs Mazda All-New CX-5: the short answer

03T and All-New CX-5 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Recorded price context 03T: current from ZAR 639,900 · All-New CX-5: announced from ZAR 570,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification 03T All-New CX-5
Maximum Power 03T135 kW All-New CX-5132 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque 03T220 Nm All-New CX-5240 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Engine Size 03TNot applicable — battery electric vehicle All-New CX-52488 cc
Combined Fuel Economy 03TNot applicable — electric consumption measured in kWh/100 km km/l All-New CX-513.2 km/l
Ground Clearance 03T190 mm All-New CX-5205 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

03T

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

All-New CX-5

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

03T

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

All-New CX-5

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec 03T All-New CX-5
Model Introduced Year 2026 2026
Generation South African May 2026 local specification sheet for the current 03T generation. Third-generation Mazda CX-5 for South Africa
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Published upcoming
Segment Electric SUV Medium SUV
Vehicle Type Passenger vehicle Passenger Vehicle
Facelift History - All-new third-generation model; no facelift applies
Facelift Launched Since - 2026
Facelift Version Ending - Current
Spec 03T All-New CX-5
Length 4433 mm 4690 mm
Width 1916 mm 1860 mm
Height 1741 mm 1695 mm
Wheelbase 2715 mm 2815 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 190 mm 205 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 165 mm 200 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity Not applicable — battery electric vehicle 56 l
Boot/Cargo Space 450 L rear seats up; 1,238 L with rear seats folded; 40 L rear storage box 466 l
Kerb Weight 1600–1950 kg 1629 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2173 kg 2190 kg
Payload Capacity 350–650 kg 561 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.9 m 6.0 m
Front Headroom 1020 mm 1007 mm
Rear Headroom 990 mm 1020 mm
Front Legroom 1060 mm 1058 mm
Rear Legroom 970 mm 1012 mm
Towing Capacity - 1500 kg

In depth: how these cars differ

This 03T and All-New CX-5 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: 03T 51 vs All-New CX-5 52.

Efficiency index: 03T 99 vs All-New CX-5 52.

Safety-equipment index: 03T 93 vs All-New CX-5 98.

Practicality index: 03T 64 vs All-New CX-5 66.

Ownership-cover index: 03T not separately scored vs All-New CX-5 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

03T leads by 7 points

03T and All-New CX-5 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 75 /100
Lead 7 points
Data 67% source coverage
75
#1 Evidence leader

03T

67% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 99 Check Performance 51
Performance 51
Efficiency 99
Safety 93
Practicality 64
Leads by 7 points
68
#2

All-New CX-5

82% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Performance 52
Performance 52
Efficiency 52
Safety 98
Practicality 66
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance All-New CX-5 +1 Efficiency 03T +47 Safety All-New CX-5 +5 Practicality All-New CX-5 +2

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

03T

Performance 51/100
Efficiency 99/100
Safety 93/100
Practicality 64/100

All-New CX-5

Performance 52/100
Efficiency 52/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 66/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index iCAUR 03T leads the specification evidence index with 75 pts vs 68 pts for All-New CX-5

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, 03T leads. However, All-New CX-5 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

03T vs All-New CX-5 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.