Mazda All-New CX-5 vs Mazda CX-60

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Mazda All-New CX-5 in South Africa

Mazda All-New CX-5

2.5 Active Edition Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Upcoming
Launch price pending
Upcoming in South Africa Confirmed launch information and specifications remain visible while final availability is pending.
⚡ 132 kW 🔧 240 Nm ⛽ 13.2 km/l
VS
Mazda CX-60 in South Africa

Mazda CX-60

2.5 Individual Edition Auto AWD Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 902,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 141 kW 🔧 261 Nm ⛽ 13.0 km/l
Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mazda All-New CX-5 vs Mazda CX-60: the short answer

All-New CX-5 and CX-60 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification All-New CX-5 CX-60
Maximum Power All-New CX-5132 kW @ 6000 rpm CX-60141 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque All-New CX-5240 Nm @ 4000 rpm CX-60261 Nm @ 3000 rpm
Engine Size All-New CX-52488 cc CX-602488 cc
Combined Fuel Economy All-New CX-513.2 km/l CX-6013.0 km/l
Ground Clearance All-New CX-5205 mm CX-60178.8 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

All-New CX-5

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

CX-60

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

All-New CX-5

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

CX-60

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec All-New CX-5 CX-60
Model Introduced Year 2026 2023
Generation Third-generation Mazda CX-5 for South Africa First-generation KH-series Mazda CX-60 on Mazda's Large Product architecture
Facelift History All-new third-generation model; no facelift applies Mazda introduced the CX-60 locally in 2023, added the six-cylinder Takumi in 2024 and revised suspension and drivetrain calibration for the 2025 update.
Facelift Launched Since 2026 2023
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status upcoming Active
Segment Medium SUV Premium mid-size SUV
Vehicle Type Passenger Vehicle SUV
Tare Mass Kg - 1470 kg
Spec All-New CX-5 CX-60
Length 4690 mm 4745 mm
Width 1860 mm 1890 mm
Height 1695 mm 1687.5 mm
Wheelbase 2815 mm 2870 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 205 mm 178.8 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 200 mm -
Fuel Tank Capacity 56 l 58 l
Boot/Cargo Space 466 l 477 l
Kerb Weight 1629 kg 1470 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2190 kg 2342 kg
Payload Capacity 561 kg 872 kg
Towing Capacity 1500 kg 1500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows -
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 6.0 m 5.85 m
Front Headroom 1007 mm -
Rear Headroom 1020 mm -
Front Legroom 1058 mm 1058 mm
Rear Legroom 1012 mm 990 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This All-New CX-5 and CX-60 comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: All-New CX-5 52 vs CX-60 59.

Efficiency index: All-New CX-5 52 vs CX-60 51.

Safety-equipment index: All-New CX-5 98 vs CX-60 98.

Practicality index: All-New CX-5 66 vs CX-60 68.

Ownership-cover index: All-New CX-5 not separately scored vs CX-60 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

CX-60 leads by 2 points

All-New CX-5 and CX-60 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 70 /100
Lead 2 points
Data 81% source coverage
70
#1 Evidence leader

CX-60

81% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Efficiency 51
Performance 59
Efficiency 51
Safety 98
Practicality 68
Leads by 2 points
68
#2

All-New CX-5

82% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Performance 52
Performance 52
Efficiency 52
Safety 98
Practicality 66
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance CX-60 +7 Efficiency All-New CX-5 +1 Safety Level Practicality CX-60 +2

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

CX-60

Performance 59/100
Efficiency 51/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 68/100

All-New CX-5

Performance 52/100
Efficiency 52/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 66/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mazda CX-60 leads the specification evidence index with 70 pts vs 68 pts for All-New CX-5

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, CX-60 leads. However, All-New CX-5 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

All-New CX-5 vs CX-60 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.